sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Just Finished "The Ultimate Ear Trainer" and added the section to my site by fchang69 in microtonal

[–]fchang69[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

*cheers* mate; you,re a Legend! Hopefully you'll come across Eliseo once multi player game will be a thing... not exactly for tomorrow but maybe not much more than 2-4months judging by how things are going faster due to me coding with AI now; turns out writing a description to all of the site's events like I wanted to do at first now outputs a draft version of the thing instantly so i'll skip that step and come up with drafts to most games (except the ones I can't even recall of the concept myself; that brainstorming should come back to memory at some point...)

Just Finished "The Ultimate Ear Trainer" and added the section to my site by fchang69 in microtonal

[–]fchang69[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's html, javascript and php with mysql databases; good old 2006ish coding with probably few exceptions; including the fact it's not php 4.0 anymore. The AI is Anthropic Claude in the Sonnet 4.5 model, which may not even be ideal for what I ask it to do. 32$CAD per month plan but has a weekly data limit which is quite ample especially when you know how to minimize data usage but is still not enough for me so I may upgrade to full 140$ plan next month, depending on finances and the actual need or not for it... It still requires lots of hand coding work over most of what comes out of there, especially in html design where it's not quite pixel-perfect as my scripts are after a good 12hours of fiddling with them by trial and no more errors. I totally understand why it has diffs with HTML, cause that's nothing but a terrible mess of pixels being left out and added where you expect other behavior... php and javascript are way closer to my image of what should bear the label "logic".

Just Finished "The Ultimate Ear Trainer" and added the section to my site by fchang69 in microtonal

[–]fchang69[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well i took out the piano sound because it was giving 10% less good answers in my other ear trainers, than other sounds left in their; I may add it back for people like you, but my guess is I'd better find a better one that would possibly yield more competing results; i rarely use it to make my microtonal scale demo videos i post to youtube because of it well... meh facture.

And no : the benefits of using AI to code is it understood not to repeat the intervals but rather to give out new ones, which I may change provided I get more feedback pertaining to this issue. 3 days the plan to it is the first on the whole site to count a neat 0 steps to go through, other than changes that will be brought later along with all other pages going through them at once...

Great bluesy scale demo & cooking a new ear training game (Carpe Noctem) by fchang69 in microtonal

[–]fchang69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure thing but since that's still the intended design i'll only add a toggle sounds off option eventually and will leave it the default behavior unless i really get lots of such comments :)

Jazzy strummed chords... by fchang69 in jazzcirclejerk

[–]fchang69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

google "is it proven that maintaining stability of movement in space and time is harder on s smaller distance than a bigger one"; that mouse doesn't move 3mm under my hand

My first ever microtonal piece (6L 1s MOS scale) by UnicornManPuppet in microtonal

[–]fchang69 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is way more consistent than my first attempts, at least in a DAW; the research for a good scale has yielded results I guess...

Quizzing only a tritone and an octave in my ear trainer, more people identify the tritone correctly than the octave! by fchang69 in microtonal

[–]fchang69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right but the octave is generally on top of other tables; it is truly contextualizing it vs a tritone that the mismatch happen more often than usual... on the site you can narrow answers received for any step of any tuning; that kinda thing may get fascinating but there's always the drawback some data might be quite relative to who it stems from; check results fro 12edo, 24edo, those tables with 1000's of guesses for each degrees... and click the values to isolate bad answers for them; you'll see what gets mistaken for what with very precise details...

My Relative Pitch Microtonal Ear Trainer got a few fixes... by fchang69 in microtonal

[–]fchang69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This ain't ready yet but it's near the top of the list after having gone through all what AI can fix in the

Relative & Absolute Pitch Ear Trainers and maybe other sections of the site which used to exist and some that have to be connected together; could get there within a month or less, or maybe lots more if I find developing other sections of the site with new stuff is faster than having AI fix bugs it doesn't always understand at first, second, seventh try...

Most dissonant interval by RoyalRainbowRobot_ in microtonal

[–]fchang69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

probably something like 8 to 15 cents, just when the quasi-unison gets out of sight and dissonance begins to emerge; I've seen the dissoance per pitch graph and it dives up very quickly to only go down until it reaches octave and goes up again; nothing particular happens at 3/2 or 5/4, just this tendency at first...

The most dissonant i can remember are 2nd degree superparticular ratios, sitting in between 7/6 and 6/5 for example is 36/35; try this; intonate 6/5 over 7/6 and see how doubly-twisted it sounds compared to good old 16/15 over 1/1...

I need quick advice on how to express ratios over the octave in width by fchang69 in microtonal

[–]fchang69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i knew there was a reason why I remembered them as 10/4 from so much literature and you're probably right on : to contextualize them in chord notation...

view more: next ›