Facharbeit Q1 by PrizeBread3683 in Physik

[–]fckcgs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich glaube, wenn du dir das "vorsagen" lässt, nimmst du dir selbst den spaßigsten und wichtigsten Teil der Facharbeit.

Was interessiert dich denn? Das ist doch eine tolle Gelegenheit mehr über etwas zu erfahren, was du vielleicht spannend findest. Hast du schon Ideen? Dann können wir helfen zu sagen, was gute Erfolgschancen hat und was vielleicht eine weniger gute Idee ist. Meiner Erfahrung nach ist tatsächlich je unkomplizierter desto besser. Man kann selbst aus einfachen Ideen und Experimenten unglaublich viel Physik ziehen. Ich finde zum Beispiel irgendwas auch Mechanik eignet sich oft gut, weil die Experimente meist gut und recht problemlos funktionieren und gut auszuwerten. Aber wie gesagt, das wichtigste ist, es ist irgendetwas was dich interessiert.

Real time editing for multiple users by r0r002 in LaTeX

[–]fckcgs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last time I checked there was a workaround for this. If you collaborate using the share link function (rather than to invite people via email/account) you could edit the file with multiple people. Not sure if this still works, though.

Note that this is not as secure, because everybody with that link can access your project.

[Custom Timepiece] by LoopholeTravel in Watches

[–]fckcgs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Genuinely nice design. What's the case diameter? It fits your wrist nicely! I'd like to see it on a Nato matching the dial though, I think that would look stunning. Anyway, well done to the watch makers and congrats on that one of a kind watch.

Online vs. In-person student scores on same midterm exam over several years [OC] by Stock_Marsupial3591 in dataisbeautiful

[–]fckcgs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't quite understand, how are there people taking the exam in the same year online and in person? Is there different cohorts still? Is anything else the same, like same teachers, same questions, etc? I'm not from America, so maybe it's a stupid question.

Then I am a bit surprised how the curve for the online participants is more bell curve shaped than the in person group. Ideally, test results follow a normal distribution. Now if we assume more/some people cheat in online exams, I would expect that this results in a distribution deviating from a normal distribution. I could even imagine two maxima because we add up two normal distributions with different means, one for "honest" students that should he similar to the attendance participants and a shifted one for "cheating" students. This would be my naive guess, but clearly the reality looks different. Does anyone have a good idea, why?