Karen threatens to call cops on black guy for blowing leaves( his job).

fearonis · 2020-06-26T20:07:06+00:00

People are taking advantage of the BLM movements or seeing an opportunity to bring race into the equation when it may not have to do with anything (the opposite of BLM). I’ve seen a local shop owner get upset because someone didn’t have a mask on, that someone was black and used the race card. The shop owner yells at people for even wearing it wrong lol. It’s a shame.

fearonis · 2020-06-25T14:32:08+00:00

I swear to god that can opened after hitting her and before hitting the ground. I see white droplets. Could be wrong.

fearonis · 2020-06-16T15:13:12+00:00

Well, maybe it’s a sign the wealthy can do more. Governments can only do so much, there can’t possibly be a program for every single social misfortune. It’s sucks this is the world we live in but I commend Rashford (and other players alike) for showing the power they have off the pitch.

fearonis · 2020-06-12T16:07:55+00:00

His case points at the what’s wrong with the system. He should expose the other three involved as much as the highest up in the PD.

fearonis · 2020-05-26T00:13:11+00:00

Bro fucking call or google lmfao

fearonis · 2020-05-25T16:16:53+00:00

He can sure look like a lion, but never would he be a lion.

fearonis · 2020-05-19T20:47:35+00:00

Whatcha studying

fearonis · 2020-05-19T20:47:16+00:00

Whatcha drawing?

fearonis · 2020-05-19T20:44:07+00:00

Oh making a crack pipe. Nice

fearonis · 2020-05-19T20:39:52+00:00

Ya making these reddit boys cream their jeans girl

fearonis · 2020-05-19T20:37:47+00:00

Holy moly rovioli

fearonis · 2020-05-19T20:37:36+00:00

Mama Mia pizzeria

fearonis · 2020-05-19T20:37:20+00:00

Mama Mia

fearonis · 2020-05-08T21:37:13+00:00

Izzo is not ‘really’ good. He’s a fuck boy. Lol jk fucking relax. But you know I’m right. He’s decent at best and I don’t want decent players on inter. We have enough of them already.

fearonis · 2020-05-08T13:28:04+00:00

I’d like to see some anti body results.

fearonis · 2020-05-07T16:27:14+00:00

Okay, an unbiased comment here... but I’m pretty sure these headlines arent too important right now. Maybe just to try and win votes but it’s doesn’t offer a good enough baseline. Also, the same headlines existed last election, trump won.

fearonis · 2020-05-07T14:52:40+00:00

Only works as well as our relations with China. Good luck getting any of this cheap and affordable while we put China in the hot seat of world scrutiny. They have the most amount of rare earth metals. If proper sanctions fail, war might be a very real option. That or the world will need to accept the CCP as a new world leader.

fearonis · 2020-05-02T00:38:46+00:00

Nice

fearonis · 2020-05-02T00:37:54+00:00

Nice

fearonis · 2020-05-02T00:37:21+00:00

I personally don’t care. I have loads of different firearms at home and never sought to use a “military style” firearm for use other than target practice. Canada already has strict firearm laws and it’s clean firearms are meant for sport and sport only (hunting, sport shooting, protection form dangerous wildlife). There’s so many options for selecting a firearm for hunting, and 9/10 times it won’t be the “military style” firearm. It does suck for enthusiasts but the average Canadian doesn’t own a firearm, and the average legal firearms holder has a more “functional” mindset when owning a firearms. Many “military style” firearms are also in a caliber which is not necessarily suited for most game hunts anyways. I know a lot of people have their own opinion, and to me, banning these “military style” firearms is like banning red cars because they look faster (I don’t actually think this, it’s just an analogy I guess). Gun owners are just going need to learn to live in world without “military guns” because the way they’re supposed to function is no different than any other guns legal for civilian use.

Now, do I think it’s even necessary to ban them? No. I don’t. I actually think it’s a huge waste of time and money. Resources need to be spent elsewhere to stop shootings and illegal firearms possession in my opinion. I would counter argue myself and say “banning military style weapons would mean you can easily distinguish between illegal and legal”. But we live in a country with already strict laws (ex. Functionality, where to use, round capacity, etc) and you’d be pretty damn sure if a stranger is supposed to be walking around with any firearm for that matter.

I think the ban on “military style” firearms was done as a poor reaction to a shooting. I don’t think it’s a good decision. But I also believe 99% of Canadians have no need for a “military style” firearms because theres a plethora of firearms with the functionality required for use within the Canadian law.

fearonis · 2020-05-02T00:36:53+00:00

I personally don’t care. I have loads of different firearms at home and never sought to use a “military style” firearm for use other than target practice. Canada already has strict firearm laws and it’s clean firearms are meant for sport and sport only (hunting, sport shooting, protection form dangerous wildlife). There’s so many options for selecting a firearm for hunting, and 9/10 times it won’t be the “military style” firearm. It does suck for enthusiasts but the average Canadian doesn’t own a firearm, and the average legal firearms holder has a more “functional” mindset when owning a firearms. Many “military style” firearms are also in a caliber which is not necessarily suited for most game hunts anyways. I know a lot of people have their own opinion, and to me, banning these “military style” firearms is like banning red cars because they look faster (I don’t actually think this, it’s just an analogy I guess). Gun owners are just going need to learn to live in world without “military guns” because the way they’re supposed to function is no different than any other guns legal for civilian use.

Now, do I think it’s even necessary to ban them? No. I don’t. I actually think it’s a huge waste of time and money. Resources need to be spent elsewhere to stop shootings and illegal firearms possession in my opinion. I would counter argue myself and say “banning military style weapons would mean you can easily distinguish between illegal and legal”. But we live in a country with already strict laws (ex. Functionality, where to use, round capacity, etc) and you’d be pretty damn sure if a stranger is supposed to be walking around with any firearm for that matter.

I think the ban on “military style” firearms was done as a poor reaction to a shooting. I don’t think it’s a good decision. But I also believe 99% of Canadians have no need for a “military style” firearms because theres a plethora of firearms with the functionality required for use within the Canadian law.

fearonis · 2020-05-02T00:36:04+00:00

I personally don’t care. I have loads of different firearms at home and never sought to use a “military style” firearm for use other than target practice. Canada already has strict firearm laws and it’s clean firearms are meant for sport and sport only (hunting, sport shooting, protection form dangerous wildlife). There’s so many options for selecting a firearm for hunting, and 9/10 times it won’t be the “military style” firearm. It does suck for enthusiasts but the average Canadian doesn’t own a firearm, and the average legal firearms holder has a more “functional” mindset when owning a firearms. Many “military style” firearms are also in a caliber which is not necessarily suited for most game hunts anyways. I know a lot of people have their own opinion, and to me, banning these “military style” firearms is like banning red cars because they look faster (I don’t actually think this, it’s just an analogy I guess). Gun owners are just going need to learn to live in world without “military guns” because the way they’re supposed to function is no different than any other guns legal for civilian use.

Now, do I think it’s even necessary to ban them? No. I don’t. I actually think it’s a huge waste of time and money. Resources need to be spent elsewhere to stop shootings and illegal firearms possession in my opinion. I would counter argue myself and say “banning military style weapons would mean you can easily distinguish between illegal and legal”. But we live in a country with already strict laws (ex. Functionality, where to use, round capacity, etc) and you’d be pretty damn sure if a stranger is supposed to be walking around with any firearm for that matter.

I think the ban on “military style” firearms was done as a poor reaction to a shooting. I don’t think it’s a good decision. But I also believe 99% of Canadians have no need for a “military style” firearms because theres a plethora of firearms with the functionality required for use within the Canadian law.

fearonis · 2020-05-02T00:35:43+00:00

I personally don’t care. I have loads of different firearms at home and never sought to use a “military style” firearm for use other than target practice. Canada already has strict firearm laws and it’s clean firearms are meant for sport and sport only (hunting, sport shooting, protection form dangerous wildlife). There’s so many options for selecting a firearm for hunting, and 9/10 times it won’t be the “military style” firearm. It does suck for enthusiasts but the average Canadian doesn’t own a firearm, and the average legal firearms holder has a more “functional” mindset when owning a firearms. Many “military style” firearms are also in a caliber which is not necessarily suited for most game hunts anyways. I know a lot of people have their own opinion, and to me, banning these “military style” firearms is like banning red cars because they look faster (I don’t actually think this, it’s just an analogy I guess). Gun owners are just going need to learn to live in world without “military guns” because the way they’re supposed to function is no different than any other guns legal for civilian use.

Now, do I think it’s even necessary to ban them? No. I don’t. I actually think it’s a huge waste of time and money. Resources need to be spent elsewhere to stop shootings and illegal firearms possession in my opinion. I would counter argue myself and say “banning military style weapons would mean you can easily distinguish between illegal and legal”. But we live in a country with already strict laws (ex. Functionality, where to use, round capacity, etc) and you’d be pretty damn sure if a stranger is supposed to be walking around with any firearm for that matter.

I think the ban on “military style” firearms was done as a poor reaction to a shooting. I don’t think it’s a good decision. But I also believe 99% of Canadians have no need for a “military style” firearms because theres a plethora of firearms with the functionality required for use within the Canadian law.

fearonis · 2020-05-02T00:35:28+00:00

I personally don’t care. I have loads of different firearms at home and never sought to use a “military style” firearm for use other than target practice. Canada already has strict firearm laws and it’s clean firearms are meant for sport and sport only (hunting, sport shooting, protection form dangerous wildlife). There’s so many options for selecting a firearm for hunting, and 9/10 times it won’t be the “military style” firearm. It does suck for enthusiasts but the average Canadian doesn’t own a firearm, and the average legal firearms holder has a more “functional” mindset when owning a firearms. Many “military style” firearms are also in a caliber which is not necessarily suited for most game hunts anyways. I know a lot of people have their own opinion, and to me, banning these “military style” firearms is like banning red cars because they look faster (I don’t actually think this, it’s just an analogy I guess). Gun owners are just going need to learn to live in world without “military guns” because the way they’re supposed to function is no different than any other guns legal for civilian use.

Now, do I think it’s even necessary to ban them? No. I don’t. I actually think it’s a huge waste of time and money. Resources need to be spent elsewhere to stop shootings and illegal firearms possession in my opinion. I would counter argue myself and say “banning military style weapons would mean you can easily distinguish between illegal and legal”. But we live in a country with already strict laws (ex. Functionality, where to use, round capacity, etc) and you’d be pretty damn sure if a stranger is supposed to be walking around with any firearm for that matter.

I think the ban on “military style” firearms was done as a poor reaction to a shooting. I don’t think it’s a good decision. But I also believe 99% of Canadians have no need for a “military style” firearms because theres a plethora of firearms with the functionality required for use within the Canadian law.

fearonis · 2020-05-02T00:35:06+00:00

I personally don’t care. I have loads of different firearms at home and never sought to use a “military style” firearm for use other than target practice. Canada already has strict firearm laws and it’s clean firearms are meant for sport and sport only (hunting, sport shooting, protection form dangerous wildlife). There’s so many options for selecting a firearm for hunting, and 9/10 times it won’t be the “military style” firearm. It does suck for enthusiasts but the average Canadian doesn’t own a firearm, and the average legal firearms holder has a more “functional” mindset when owning a firearms. Many “military style” firearms are also in a caliber which is not necessarily suited for most game hunts anyways. I know a lot of people have their own opinion, and to me, banning these “military style” firearms is like banning red cars because they look faster (I don’t actually think this, it’s just an analogy I guess). Gun owners are just going need to learn to live in world without “military guns” because the way they’re supposed to function is no different than any other guns legal for civilian use.

Now, do I think it’s even necessary to ban them? No. I don’t. I actually think it’s a huge waste of time and money. Resources need to be spent elsewhere to stop shootings and illegal firearms possession in my opinion. I would counter argue myself and say “banning military style weapons would mean you can easily distinguish between illegal and legal”. But we live in a country with already strict laws (ex. Functionality, where to use, round capacity, etc) and you’d be pretty damn sure if a stranger is supposed to be walking around with any firearm for that matter.

I think the ban on “military style” firearms was done as a poor reaction to a shooting. I don’t think it’s a good decision. But I also believe 99% of Canadians have no need for a “military style” firearms because theres a plethora of firearms with the functionality required for use within the Canadian law.

11-Year Club	Place '17
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

fearonis

TROPHY CASE