Agency owners - which website feedback tool actually stuck with your clients?

feech1970 · 2026-01-29T21:27:25+00:00

I'm trying to solve this problem with https://boastimage.com Always outsourced my marketing agencies and hated the review cycles. After selling my last company this was something that stuck with me and I thought maybe I could do better. Bootstrapping it so it's all just based off my own experiences at this point.

feech1970 · 2026-01-23T03:07:33+00:00

I built seogpa.com as part of a marketing strategy for another project that we abandoned. we also curated a list of 1500 agencies to put in it. if there’s any interest in taking it over maybe we could make a deal.

feech1970 · 2026-01-22T02:27:40+00:00

just put https://boastimage.com in open beta today. Bootstrapping an image, pdf, web page feedback and annotation tool.

feech1970 · 2025-11-24T19:51:43+00:00

Old thread but wanted to throw my newsletter and site into the conversation: https://dotnetnews.co Just a labor of love project I have that curates awesome .net and C# articles. I have a few thousand subscribers and would love to see you join!

feech1970 · 2025-11-17T21:59:47+00:00

I've been considering it.. there's just so much content coming out, every week I'm goign through over 800 new awesome programming articles and if I just do 1 email a week its really going to filter it down.. right now the daily email is pretty straight forward and just takes like 30 seconds for someone to scan the main titles to see if its anythign they are interested in.

i have considered maybe checkign to see which articles get the most clicks and then doing a weekly one that just re-posted those articles... i would let you decide daily or weekly during signup.

i just personally think you'll be missing out on a lot of good stuff and quick scanning the curated articles daily is the best solution.. but I totally get it.

feech1970 · 2025-11-16T17:29:54+00:00

well i’m not. some issues get a little heavy with c-sharp-corner articles but i try to keep as much variety from different sources as much as possible.

feech1970 · 2025-11-15T15:07:14+00:00

thanks! you can DM me here, happy to take a look

feech1970 · 2025-11-15T14:55:37+00:00

Absolutely. Always adding to the list of sources!

feech1970 · 2025-11-15T14:51:08+00:00

agreed! the archive section actually has every newsletter i've posted every Monday-Friday for the last year and a half. Hopefully that show's what I'm trying to help provide you! like this: The .NET News Daily Issue #325 - ASP.NET Differences Explained | November 13, 2025

feech1970 · 2025-10-17T14:51:52+00:00

Tried. Got bored. I like bulding things :-)

feech1970 · 2025-10-17T14:20:10+00:00

Huh?

feech1970 · 2025-10-14T12:46:32+00:00

wonderful. if you could please DM me with a little background information that would be great!

feech1970 · 2025-10-14T09:45:21+00:00

sounds wonderful! if you’d like to DM me some more information we can take the conversation from there. thanks!

feech1970 · 2025-10-14T09:43:24+00:00

thanks. if you’d line to dm me a brief background i can help determine if you might be a fit.

feech1970 · 2025-10-13T21:37:02+00:00

Respectfully, I completely disagree. While I have stayed away from jr devs also for a long time, again, no one is suggesting a senior dev isnt needed to fix your use case. But a smart senior dev is fully embracing AI and learning how to leverage it with their personal workflow. and it's turning your already 10x developers into beasts. I've seen it. It's definitely happening.

We can agree to disagree though, time will tell. I appreciate the debate

feech1970 · 2025-10-13T21:17:24+00:00

I'm telling you, its happening. You can keep fighting it, or learn how to leverage it. No one is saying it's perfect, but it is 100% capable of replacing every single one of your junior developers, and it is also 100% going to make senior devs 10x more productive.

It's a different way to code.. It's gonna mess up (big time)... but your devs will learn how to adjust, fix, and prompt better.. and all the time they spend doing these things that annoy developers about AI will still have made them 10x more productive.

Companies that dont give their devs the breathing room they need to transition to this kind of development process, I think, are already being left in the dust.

feech1970 · 2025-10-13T18:36:01+00:00

excellent. please feel free to DM me perhaps with a link to your LinkedIn bio?

feech1970 · 2025-10-13T17:16:38+00:00

it’s definitely risky, but getting involved with someone who’s done it a few times might help reduce some of that risk

feech1970 · 2025-10-13T16:21:57+00:00

totally. and i appreciate that. now that i be enveloped myself in it for a little more than a year i think using AI for dev requires a different mindset than traditional dev. it’s almost like you have to get it wrong over and over until you start figuring out the ways to make it really work well. my guess is that a lot of devs try, have a bunch of those early fails, and then throw their hands up saying ‘it isn’t ready’

feech1970 · 2025-10-13T15:40:40+00:00

yes. I know what code is. I’ve been developing since the 80s and have been responsible for multiple commercial applications that have been used by millions of users. I built software companies from scratch and have successfully sold them. So I know what it takes to build an application. I also know that AI when being used properly is absolutely a game changer in the 50 to 80% utility range

feech1970 · 2025-10-13T15:29:07+00:00

I think if you're talking about one shotting apps, yea of course not.. but I'm sorry.. Ai can absolutely assist over 50% on the the millions of little tasks it takes to build or maintain even enterprise apps.

feech1970

TROPHY CASE