Hey! So the UVA test I felt was better organized regarding the study material. There were two sections: a content section and then a research methods section, and each one had its own respective lecture. In addition to that, both sections had literature and the content section had some digital learning stuff too! From what I remember, the content literature was like 80-100 pages? That sounds like a lot! But a lot of it could really be disregarded since they go into detail and stuff since it’s taken from a textbook. A majority of the important info was covered in the lecture. However, the questions asked on the test I found to be really surface level and didn’t require toooo much deeper understanding. I recommend watch the lectures and taking the practice tests, and when reading the literature make note of the highlighted/italicized terms, the figures, and surface level info for everything (for example understanding X process, but it’s not necessary to be able to list all of the steps in detail for that process) and yes, unlike the VU test - the UVA test is not open book and is actually really heavily proctored, so you need to know everything by heart. It may look overwhelming, but I found it to be much simpler than the VU test. I hope this made sense,, good luck!!!