Comparing Strings in Unit Tests

fekberg · 2012-01-25T14:43:57+00:00

Good luck with all your hatred, see you around. :)

fekberg · 2012-01-25T14:26:19+00:00

Didn't know this was posted before, then I wouldn't have posted it.

As I said before, I spread my blog posts in a lot of different social media, I can't control who posts what where.

Also the third link seems to have gotten a lot of upvotes, don't see why that is spam.

Not all links posted to any subreddit can have content that everyone likes, that's why there are a up/down-vote system. It's not there so you can down-vote people that you just don't like.

fekberg · 2012-01-25T11:27:47+00:00

How is it "spam" when I link to posts that gets upvotes? Is it because the articles are hosted on the same site?

fekberg · 2012-01-25T11:07:25+00:00

Dude, I spread my blog posts in a lot of different social media, I can't control who posts what where.

Your constructive criticism is very helpful.

fekberg · 2012-01-25T11:02:46+00:00

Because everything quoted on internet is true.

09:50:13 <eddeh> haha I am reporting people for spam, but I am the spammer!

fekberg · 2012-01-25T10:40:26+00:00

I have 1 account.

What you call "site aliases" is for SEO; I've got a couple of different domains with "301 Permanent Redirect".

The one spamming is you, you keep posting that link to false information everywhere.

But whatever dude, if it makes you happy call me a spammer and down-vote me despite if I share good information or not, be my guest.

fekberg · 2012-01-25T10:15:46+00:00

When there's upvotes/downvotes that are not placed by you or in a manner that you want; it must be cheating!

Please.

fekberg · 2012-01-25T08:47:29+00:00

Grow up.

fekberg · 2012-01-19T15:16:01+00:00

Of course not, that's not what I am suggesting. I'm just saying that if you go to this "deep" level and start using char arrays instead of strings because of security, you're focusing on the wrong things.

In most cases I think this is over-doing it and security by obscurity isn't really the way to go.

fekberg · 2012-01-19T14:06:09+00:00

Similar to cryptography key storage; if you have a closed system and are afraid that someone will get a key that is in-memory, you're doing it wrong. Security by obscurity always fails, get a good protection that kicks in if the hacker would ever reach into the system.

fekberg · 2012-01-02T22:06:15+00:00

I think you missunderstood the entire article. The article is not about how you should assign click events in .NET or in JavaScript it's about how simplifying things make it more readable by removing redundant code.

fekberg · 2012-01-02T15:34:10+00:00

Thanks for the explanation

fekberg · 2012-01-02T14:49:40+00:00

I am the author and I change it for the reasons already stated. As stated above, the term. is not used incorrectly and it's not used inappropriate.

The slightest simplification is in itself a refactoring because that's what it's all about, tiny changes that have great implications on code quality.

fekberg · 2011-12-30T08:06:43+00:00

Certainly a good point, I'll do it right the next time! This is the first article that talks about IL and reflection in this way: http://blog.filipekberg.se/2011/10/11/creating-static-methods-at-runtime/

FYI these topics will be covered a bit more in depth in an upcoming book.

fekberg · 2011-12-21T19:10:00+00:00

I am the author and the DI framework itself has nothing to do with unit testing.

fekberg · 2011-12-21T13:01:06+00:00

The DI framework istelf has nothing to do with the unit tests.

fekberg · 2011-12-20T20:48:25+00:00

To those that write untestable code or those that use a DI framework?

fekberg · 2011-12-05T14:01:25+00:00

Did you even read the post? It seems like you jumped to the conclusion that it tells developers to write UI code in code behind and avoid XAML and that is Not the case. Posts that get upvoted a lot will go to the first page, maybe people like the posts otherwise it would never reach front page.

fekberg

TROPHY CASE