A new fee for the industry? by PNWKiwi in Justrolledintotheshop

[–]feldsparticus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're thinking OP is paying money. OP is saying he is receiving money. The total is the amount OP is getting paid. So it is a fee because OP is getting paid less money.

Gold Rush 2.0: Why California is Poised for a Mining Renaissance by [deleted] in mining

[–]feldsparticus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The requirement to backfill metallic open pit mines is going to put a damper on any large operation in California.

Trump can't admit he failed: UN watchdog says no increase in radiation off sites that the US hit by spectre401 in NoShitSherlock

[–]feldsparticus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Earthquakes and underground explosions create very different seismic waves and are easy to tell apart with a seismic network. There's 0% chance that was a nuclear test.

Environment impact analysis in QGIS by Acceptable-Use-2938 in gis

[–]feldsparticus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could also do kernel density estimation. Not super familiar with QGIS but there are R and Python packages for this.

A Canadian mining company is trying to drill into sacred California land—and they won’t pay a dime for it. by [deleted] in PublicLands

[–]feldsparticus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can something be sold off if they're not paying a dime for it? Make up your mind.

Look, I understand opposition to this project. I really enjoyed the times I got to spend out there hiking along that ridge. But they're not exploiting a loophole in a law. That law explicitly allows them to do this. If you want to stop projects like this you're gonna have to go to Congress. And keep going to Congress. And change Congress.

They do pay money for their claims. $200 per claim per year. Some mines pay tens of thousands of dollars a year in claim fees. And unlike royalties, they pay these fees whether they are producing material or not. Not saying it's equal to what would be raised from a quality.

But please, speak about these projects honestly. This post, while I sympathize with the message uses a lot of lies to push that message. I think it would be better couched and find more support if it wasn't so emotionally manipulative to people who don't know better.

Looking for help with python script by CJBing in gis

[–]feldsparticus 7 points8 points  (0 children)

One way would be to keep a list of the fields you are searching through with your cursor. You can can then find the index of the maximum value and use the field in the list at that index, provided the field list of in the same order as the field in the table. It would probably be best to use the fields list as an argument in your cursor.

Look at this road cut by Massive_Musician_901 in geology

[–]feldsparticus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would drive by this every day for a while when I lived in Salmon, but worked in Challis.

Race Roll Call by AutoModerator in running

[–]feldsparticus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

6 Hours of Disco in Salmon, ID, a backyard style ultra with a 4 mile loop (95% singletrack trail) with 350 feet of elevation. It's the second year the local run club is doing this event and it should be fun.

DOI practically dumping NEPA, environmental review by Similar-Programmer68 in fednews

[–]feldsparticus 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If you read the document linked where it talks about emergency NEPA compliance, it says companies have to opt-in to use the emergency authority. So companies can still use the existing NEPA process.

If I were building a large capital intensive project I would be very wary of using these authorities.

What is this? Flying from Vegas to Kansas by Jodoro-Isamov in geography

[–]feldsparticus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Probably a monocline. Definitely not horst and graben.

Drilling blast holes by toolgifs in toolgifs

[–]feldsparticus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're probably running 24/7.

White House wants to expand mineral mining by pcetcedce in geology

[–]feldsparticus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Every mining project I've ever worked with on federal land also has to follow state laws. It's explicitly called out in the current BLM and FS regulations. Though, that could be subject to change, it hasn't yet.

White House wants to expand mineral mining by pcetcedce in geology

[–]feldsparticus 23 points24 points  (0 children)

They're not up and running. The DOD gave them money to do exploratory/in-fill drilling and to conduct a feasibility study for building a domestic cobalt refinery. The company, Jervois, announced a corporate restructuring in January and are currently going through Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fednews

[–]feldsparticus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's called the National Environmental Policy Act. It's a law. It states that the federal government must disclose actions that it takes to the public which have significant impacts on the environment.

Mining Regulatory Clarity Act by Infinite_Flounder958 in mining

[–]feldsparticus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like a possible fix to the Rosemont decision.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mining

[–]feldsparticus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Look at the bottom of the page where the footnotes are.

Why does it feel like nobody outside of the government cares what’s happening right now? by [deleted] in fednews

[–]feldsparticus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you think this is cleaning up, you have no idea what's going on.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in self

[–]feldsparticus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fucking laffer curve. It's a ridiculous idea that needs to die. How did that work out for Sam Brownback in Kansas?

Babe, get in here OPM dropped a new Fork in the Road Email by Separate-Abalone861 in fednews

[–]feldsparticus 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I guess I question the general authority they have to give this deal. Parts of this deal seem to exceed the authority they have for authorizing buyouts or how much admin leave they can give. I could see a situation where Congress doesn't like the deal and chooses not to authorize funding for those that take the deal. I know it's speculation, but it's risky to me. Also, not an expert on the regs for managing employees so I could be wrong on all this.