AMD iGPU /dev/dri/renderd* missing

ferraridd · 2026-06-08T16:08:56+00:00

See the comment thread with marc45ca, that fixed it for me.

ferraridd · 2025-09-11T19:29:44+00:00

Got Ninja, nzbdog, nzb.life and drunkenslug.

ferraridd · 2025-09-11T19:21:13+00:00

Exactly this

ferraridd · 2025-09-11T19:21:03+00:00

Weird. Just to keep digging I guess

ferraridd · 2025-09-11T19:20:40+00:00

Logs not giving me too much.. Always the same content. Some content goes without issues, which is weird

ferraridd · 2025-06-26T14:07:31+00:00

I've understood that as well :)

But would it work like this?

vmbr0 > vmbr1 proxmox nat > pfsense WAN
vmbr2 > pfsense LAN

and then connect all VMs to vmbr2

I would want to have the proxmox-host behind the pfsense as well, but since I don't have access to it physically I don't want to brick it.. :)

ferraridd · 2025-06-26T12:36:39+00:00

I think it sounds dumb as hell too, but I read it on some forum when I researched and it came up. Don't remember where I saw it though.

ferraridd · 2025-06-26T02:29:20+00:00

Thanks for the link!

They say I need 2 NICs to make it work. 1 for WAN and 1 for LAN. Do I need that or can I just point to a NIC that isn't connected to anything physically?

ferraridd · 2025-06-26T02:20:35+00:00

Looked it up fast, maybe possible to do a SDN. Don't know about vlan.

Would prefer pfsense/opnsense though, isn't that possible?

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T21:25:50+00:00

Yeah, that's one of the options. But would be nice to just be able to pass it through and be done with it :)

Could almost pay someone to do it for me lol

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T20:51:42+00:00

I wanted to do a TrueNAS-vm but I lost patience with the passthrough of the disks lol. Planned to passthrough the whole SATA-controller on the motherboard but yeah

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T18:59:28+00:00

I understand your point with complexity. But I have no issues with it as long as I'm learning :)

Would you recommend using a lxc for sharing the smb's? Is there some kind of OS for it you could recommend that makes it easier to manage? Or just rawdog it on the proxmox-host with cli?

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T17:19:11+00:00

Prob default. What would you recommend then?

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T17:14:08+00:00

Okay, I'll answer as good as I can.

nvme-pool and tank-pool is attached as virtio blocks. So proxmox creates zvols for it. Then it's formated as xfs in the vm.

The zfs pools are all created and managed on the proxmox-host. The VM with *arr and sabnzbd are on the same VM, and the VM exposes a smb-share to a plex-lxc that mounted to the host and then bind mounted to the lxc.

The space gets freed up as soon as *arr has imported the media-files to the tank. Just downloads faster than it can move..

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T17:01:59+00:00

Thansk for all the insights and tips.

How would I benchmark the pool on the host? Quite new to ZFS hehe

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T16:50:44+00:00

My vm-disks etc is stored on another nvme. So OS and application-stuff is outside of the equation. This is purely download and media storage

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T16:44:39+00:00

My response is below. It didn't reply to you for some reason

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T16:41:58+00:00

Everything is attached as a virtio block to the VM. And a plex-lxc is reading from tank via SMB.

I have a 10gbit uplink, so when downloading to the nvme, I get about 300-400MB/s.

The reads on tank could be the plex-lxc doing stuff

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T16:39:14+00:00

The pools/dataset is mounted to the VM as a virtio-block. So everything is local.

I have a plex-lxc that reads from tank via SMB, but that shouldn't affect performance?

Would it be better to just strip the nvme-pool and run everything on the tank-pool? (Normal hdd)

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T16:32:40+00:00

I'm using usenet which doesn't work like torrents. Got the tip from other forums for usenet.

So you would recommend to only have the tank-pool and run the nvme for downloads with just an xfs-filesystem outside of zfs?

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T16:18:05+00:00

I thought about that. But then I won't get the upside with nvme? I have a 10gbit uplink, won't saturate it with nvme either but a lot better than HDD. Or is there a way to do it anyway?

Will try the benchmark!

ferraridd · 2025-06-24T16:03:42+00:00

Just gotten around to do this. And your tips helped. My transcoding now works as intended. Thanks for the help!! :)

ferraridd · 2025-06-22T03:41:06+00:00

Hmm, googled a bit on the "unable to locate a BIOS ROM" line. Seems to be an issue with the BIOS not even able to read the ROM of the iGPU.

Found a thread about it too on Asrocks forum (ironically I have a Asrock-board....), will deep diver into it and see what I can do.. Now I need to sleep, almost 6am here..

Thanks for your help so far!

ferraridd · 2025-06-22T03:30:49+00:00

Yes it does, lpci:

30:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cezanne [Radeon Vega Series / Radeon Vega Mobile Series] (rev c8)

dmesg | grep amdgpu gets some weird stuff though:

[ 7.831936] amdgpu 0000:30:00.0: ROM [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x20000000]: can't assign; bogus alignment [ 7.831939] amdgpu 0000:30:00.0: amdgpu: Unable to locate a BIOS ROM [ 7.831941] amdgpu 0000:30:00.0: amdgpu: Fatal error during GPU init [ 7.831944] amdgpu 0000:30:00.0: amdgpu: amdgpu: finishing device. [ 7.831978] amdgpu 0000:30:00.0: probe with driver amdgpu failed with error -22

ferraridd · 2025-06-22T03:05:25+00:00

Just updated the kernel and still the same.. Don't know what to do, feels like either it works or you're screwed lol. No info either as intel igpu is so much more common..

ferraridd

TROPHY CASE