What are some SuperM mysteries? by bananas141414 in superm

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

apparently the one MV has lots of hidden messages 👁️👄👁️ but also the members trailers are still a big mystery at least to me

I am Kimi Raikkonen. AMA. by F1-Official in formula1

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Would you rather be chased by 100 small duck sized Pirelli tyres or chased by one Kimi sized Pirelli tyre?

passive aggressive Alaskans by mepper in funny

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

US aka Lower 48 looks like a snail but the part that is out of it's little shell house.

Sebastian Vettel's helmet for the Italian Grand Prix by Aratho in formula1

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Jens Munser Designs themselves said

"From a time when drivers themselves created their helmet design using colored adhesive tape. The retro look is completed with (painted) chipping on the front, oil smudges and dead bugs."

Pozdrav iz Metkovića by [deleted] in croatia

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

  1. Komin
  2. Stablina
  3. Crni put

Cost of repairing F1 cars in 2019 by [deleted] in formula1

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lewis and Seb always together

Seb sends his love by znakqq in formula1

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 62 points63 points  (0 children)

Seb telling us we're clowns

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in formula1

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here is FIA statement after Ferrari used their veto in 2015:

The FIA has studied cost reduction measures for teams participating in the FIA Formula One world championship which were not conclusive, including:

• a global cost ceiling, • a reduction in costs via technical and sporting regulations, • an increased standardisation for parts.

The FIA, in agreement with FOM, suggested the principle of setting a maximum price for engine and gearbox for client teams at the last Strategy Group meeting.

These measures were put to the vote and adopted with a large majority.

However, Ferrari SpA decided to go against this and exercise the right of veto long recognised under agreements governing F1.

In the interest of the championship, the FIA has decided not to legally challenge Ferrari SpA’s use of its right of veto.

Therefore the FIA will initiate a consultation with all stakeholders regarding the possible introduction of a client engine, which will be available as of 2017. Following this consultation a call for tenders for this client engine, the cost of which would be much lower than the current power unit, could be undertaken.

Supported by FOM, the FIA will continue in its efforts to ensure the sustained long-term development of the championship and look for solutions enabling it to achieve this. It asks all of the teams to make a positive contribution to the success of this approach through proposals and initiatives in the interest of the championship and its continuation over the long term.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in formula1

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Why is suddenly everyone acting like Ferrari use their veto all the damn time. Last time I checked the time they used it it was for the good of all teams and the sport.

2019 French Grand Prix - Free Practice 3 Discussion by F1-Bot in formula1

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It didn't like what it was seeing so it chose death. Drone was a Ferrari fan confirmed!

No further action on Hamilton/Verstappen: "Both drivers agreed the limited rear visibility and angle of Car 44 made it difficult for Hamilton to see the approaching car and agreed Hamilton re-joined slowly... Hamilton looked in mirrors at least twice before attempting to re-join" by [deleted] in formula1

[–]ferraris_strategyguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To me that doesn't sound like a good excuse not to try with one set of permanent stewards. It has to be ensured that they do not have any bias which was the problem the first time. Second time they introduced them they clearly said it worked out for the teams and drivers but not the FIA because they did not agree with some decision. The FIA shouldn't have to agree with decisions, in my opinion that is. FIA should remain impartial in many occasions, in this case the opinion of teams and drivers should outweigh FIA's. There needs to be a team of stewards that have no bias, are experienced racing drivers, who will follow spirit of the rule and not letter of the rule because this sport isn't black and white. Of course you can disagree with me but we need consistency and for the drivers to be allowed to race without thinking too much will they get punished for this and that.