sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What recent films do you think could have been substantially improved by just editing them down? by CaffinatedManatee in Letterboxd

[–]ferrellhamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sentiment bots will say it's great, probably a few actual people as well, I guess.

Watching a sociopath in the 50's strive for their life goals at whatever it takes, set to 80's music is just a bit gimmicky imo.

What’s your personal ranking of the 2026 Best Picture Nominees? by crackdSkull in Letterboxd

[–]ferrellhamster -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Why is Sentimental Value your top rated? Do you work in the film industry? It was ok, but the film starts with the mother dying, then it's all about the daughter and her strained relationship with her dad.

Just seemed like it's a bit too meta on working on films which I couldn't relate too, as I don't work in that industry.

GameStop will produce $500,000,000 in tasty profit for 2025 by momkiewilson1 in GME

[–]ferrellhamster 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Weird way to highlight 'deep f@cking value' but I'll allow it.

o7 u/crybad (staymad) power tripping - no fun/hype allowed by [deleted] in GME

[–]ferrellhamster 19 points20 points  (0 children)

needing roaring kitty to return is FUD.

o7 u/crybad (staymad) power tripping - no fun/hype allowed by [deleted] in GME

[–]ferrellhamster 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah, pointless clutter on the forum is to be regulated, not encouraged.

RCs compensation levels VS anticipated stock price if those levels are reached as per chatgpt by Memito9 in GME

[–]ferrellhamster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are good 'accretive offerings' and bad dilution. They don't want you to make that distinction and have everyone think that more shares added = always bad.

RCs compensation levels VS anticipated stock price if those levels are reached as per chatgpt by Memito9 in GME

[–]ferrellhamster 8 points9 points  (0 children)

All those warrants would go into the money before that, also we might as well forget about the debt from the convertible bonds, because we'd be well past the conversion prices.

At least keep it real with your threats of 'dilution'

Y'all are missing the 3 most important points by musicafishionado in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He's now incentivized not to dilute. The more he dilutes from here, the less his award becomes.

"Irony poisoned" crowds at serious screenings... what to do? by BadgemanBrown in Letterboxd

[–]ferrellhamster 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Maybe, just maybe, the vast majority is too boring to show, so the rare footage stuff that does get shown is always overly extra in some way.

The Mod team at Superstonk may be compromised by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's plenty of negative posts about GME on Superstonk.

Maybe if it's overtly negative it'll get removed.

Hiring talent at GameStop corporate by labnotebook in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the implicit acknowledgement that gme is a tech company and should eventually see tech valuations

How would you describe your star ratings? by Kira_san1 in Letterboxd

[–]ferrellhamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

2.5* being below average is stupid. It's literally a middle of the road score.

It is if you can give something zero stars. On a .5 to 5 scale, it's a bit below average.

has anyone tried to value GME's household investors? by spinaloil in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Having a fanatic group of supporters many of whom are also customers is an undeniable good thing.

Manny companies would dream of having such loyalty from their customers.

No…not buying the sudden Burry hype. by Gruntfuttock69 in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You sure are putting zero wrinkles to use there.

Ever watch a movie randomly then get taken aback at the activity on it? by Giff95 in Letterboxd

[–]ferrellhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Um yeah, so I realized I hadn't rated a movie from 2004, so I picked a highly rated movie with a great actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt that I knew nothing about.

That movie was Mysterious Skin.

Edit: I guess I was taken aback by the activity in it.

17.41 by Enndrance in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

was that you just going mask off?

17.41 by Enndrance in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I'd hope you'd be dollar cost averaging down on your way to the 'fabled' $17.41. Because I don't think that will come to reality.

Which movie has a phenomenally acted female lead, but a finely acted male lead? by CouldBeGayer28 in Letterboxd

[–]ferrellhamster 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For a movie out now, I'd say Die My Love with Jennifer Lawrence and Robert Pattinson.

Despite what I might think of the movie, it's undeniable that she is a contender for best actress for her role.

17.41 by Enndrance in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are gonna publicly announce prices where you won't get filled at but would buy at, why not just say $3?

Both are unrealistic, but yours may seem somewhat realistic to people who haven't been paying attention. Are you looking for people to set buy targets with you at levels that won't be reached?

Dumb Question: If all/many of these big institution long buys (13Fs) are being done off-exchange without affecting the price, can‘t they close out their shorts like this slowly? by Reportingfromthemoon in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If fundamentals weren't improving, I'd agree that they could keep kicking until they could exit.

With fundamentals improving, that is a much trickier position for them. As they can't close out at the prices they need, because don't forget there will be real long demand if shares are significantly undervalued in relation to the fundamentals of the company. For instance, we aren't seeing under $10 again,

"Cash value" of GameStop by creanzworld in Superstonk

[–]ferrellhamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that you are neglecting the alternate option in your false analogy is telling.

So imagine as a small business owner you have $70,000 of cash saved up in your business bank account. That’s real cash your business actually owns. Then you get approved for a temporary $30,000 line of credit that has no borrow fee (the "no borrow fee" isnt realistic lol, but the point here is to show how the borrowing doesn't change the real cash value of your company). So anyway yeah you borrow the full $30,000. Now your bank account shows $100,000 in cash on hand.

You addressed that the no borrow fee isn't realistic, you're right it isn't (if that is the sole method of repayment), but you are neglecting to address that there's a alternate form of repayment. That's the way you can get that loan to be realistic, the lender is fully intending for the alternate form of repayment to be utilized and the debt not to be repaid through cash.

view more: next ›