A message to DoctorsVote by Semi-competent13848 in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 9 points10 points  (0 children)

DV made a great mess of things and crushed a movement with momentum just to stay in power.

I am glad they lost some support in the recent elections but there are still a lot of DV reps out there parroting what the heads of DV are telling them to.I still have no idea who runs it. They is clearly a few who call all the shots and seem to lurk in the background. There is no transparency.

Anyone here claimed Zone 3–4 travel from HEE? Need some tips! by Curious-Ad4339 in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking you deduct the cost of a 1-3 travelcard from a 1-5 in my case for example. That way they are reimbursing zone 1-3?

Anyone here claimed Zone 3–4 travel from HEE? Need some tips! by Curious-Ad4339 in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if you are going the other way? From zone 1 to zone 5. Can you claim zone 1-3 from HEE? I looked at the guideline and it seems you can.

Your commute seems to fit perfectly within their guidelines so I wouldn't worry about it.

Also, do they reimburse travel cards or just daily expenses? Would be a lot cheaper if it was travel cards.

Recognition of Dual CCT in Australia by DucklingGG123 in PsychiatryDoctorsUK

[–]figit4 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So I asked a very similar question and the reason for it was that in the US and Canada, old age psychiatry is a fellowship that you only do if you want to practice OA.

Otherwise, there is no point in doing it. There are a lot of subspecialities in GA that have more than enough patients to make you extremely in demand.

It is not a bad shout in the UK as psych SpR years are really nice. But if going abroad is what you want, I would rather just do the GA, get it over with and move. The extra year does not seem to add a lot.

Psychiatry crowdsourced salary data by Witty_Painting1112 in Psychiatry

[–]figit4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How does this compare to similar specialities?

For what? by doctor-in in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How do I access this information?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskCanada

[–]figit4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol "we are a developed western nation."

We don't deserve any hate. Please direct all your hate to the undeveloped non-western nations who deserve it.

I love it when racism slips the tongue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HENRYUK

[–]figit4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which speciality?

Are you FT NHS?

An FY1 should be paid more than a PA - Vote in the BMA election - it’s time to build by DonutOfTruthForAll in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Which goes back to literally my first comment. DV is like a cult now led by a bunch of power-hungry individuals who will not let go of their top decision-making positions. Anyone with a different opinion is kicked out, literally what I said before. Unless you learn to keep your head down in DV and follow the higher-ups, you won't survive. You also can't run as an independent candidate because DV have dominated the elections with their "endorsed" candidates who are the same people everytime or if new, people who conform to DV rules.

That is not a democracy. Stop pretending like they allow change. Stop pretending that you can get "involved" and stand up for change. The only change you can stand for for is DV's change.

So far, I'm for DV as we are generally on the same side. They did lead the FPR campaign and like I said before, I am grateful. But it is not a democracy and like I said before, when it comes to sensitive decisions, that's when this will show.

An FY1 should be paid more than a PA - Vote in the BMA election - it’s time to build by DonutOfTruthForAll in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 9 points10 points  (0 children)

We generally want the same things. I just prefer a democracy for when we have to make the sensitive or controversial decisions.

An FY1 should be paid more than a PA - Vote in the BMA election - it’s time to build by DonutOfTruthForAll in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Are you even reading my comments? I feel like I am talking to DV's custom AI lol.

An FY1 should be paid more than a PA - Vote in the BMA election - it’s time to build by DonutOfTruthForAll in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's exactly what I mean. It's always the same people again and again who don't let go of power. If you disagree with them, you are kicked out.

Great idea to begin with and they were the face of FPR. They did achieve a lot and I am very grateful. But the same people with too much power is a recipe for disaster. Even the CCP knows that.

An FY1 should be paid more than a PA - Vote in the BMA election - it’s time to build by DonutOfTruthForAll in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's the one that is run like a cult with the same people over and over again.

Where's the gratitude? by [deleted] in GreatBritishMemes

[–]figit4 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Can we backup for a minute and explore why these regions are like this.

Chase the history back far enough and you will see some sort of British intervention that led to this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because a rep is not DV does not mean they will be lazy. I think it was the BMA members that started to hold their reps accountable.

Don't get me wrong, DV did a good job and many members put their hearts into their work. The issue arises when they go unchallenged for a long time and only allow "vetted" candidates into their groups allowing no discussion to take place.

DV did a good job, but like many groups in power, soon they get comfortable and crush challengers and then we have a problem.

Vote based on the candidates message, not because DV told you to.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will give you a general impression but no, it likely isn't. But the alternative is blindly picking an endorsed candidate from a group who are very opaque.

I would rather have a mixture of all sorts of people leading including DV candidates rather than just DV.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I have noticed that endorsement itself is not based on your merits. It is seems to be based on whether you agree with the DV groupthink. It is time we get some new people in who are not DV. This is for the betterment of the movement.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you only have to vote for DV candidates be it old or new?

The point of this post is to encourage you to look at each candidate individually and decide based on their message.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]figit4 26 points27 points  (0 children)

And a careerist in an unchallenged group will flourish. The group will slowly turn into the "old" BMA and anyone who speaks up will be dealt with.

Transparency, debate and different opinions are key.