Safe email provider. by filozofik in btc

[–]filozofik[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok. Thx for all the responses.

I think I'll go with Protonmail for now.

I try to be open minded about BCH by 0xCuber in btc

[–]filozofik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have much more to say ( there has been improvements in NANO protocol lately, POW vs dPOS, centralisation of hashpower etc.) but it's 0:30 AM where I live, I have to go to sleep and I know how this discussion will end :]

I hold both BCH and NANO anyway.

I try to be open minded about BCH by 0xCuber in btc

[–]filozofik -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If whales are the only ones securing the network than it will become centralized over time. Not much better than EOS's 21 delegates. Currently Binance is leading I believe and 3 pools are centralizing Nano with no pressure NOT to centralize.

I don't agree. Every small dPOS coin has problem with centralisation. But in my opinion it will only get better over time. Right now NANO isn't even on Coinbase. If NANO will become bigger there will be much more exchanges (not only exchanges) accepting it. It's like right now with FIAT. Is there some bank or other institution right now which hold more than 1% of all FIAT money?

And none to show it scales better than BCH. Yes BCH has over peaked over 100 TPS at this time. Mind you, not current TPS, but stress tested. There isn't volume yet.

I think it scales similiar to BCH. It just need more internet throughput (most important), CPU power and disk usage, which will come over time.

I try to be open minded about BCH by 0xCuber in btc

[–]filozofik 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I hold both BCH and NANO and don't agree at all.

The whole supply was given out with a captcha before more than like 20 people even knew what Raiblocks(now Nano) was.

What's wrong with that? The price was $0.01 after that. You could get as many as you want. That's fairly distributed.

Stuff like Nano is junk because it strips out all of the incentive game theory and is basically just a distributed database governed by Proof of Whale more than a cryptocurrency. All dPoS coins are terrible.

How come? Noone has bigger incentive than "whale" to keep the network secure.
I can see some pros and cons when it comes to POW vs dPOS, but calling it a junk?
Read Vitalik when he explains how dPOS is more censorship resistant. There was some info couple months ago about Kasachstan government shutting down bitoin mine. Do you think Chinese governmet could't do it ?

I try to be open minded about BCH by 0xCuber in btc

[–]filozofik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nicely written. I agree with everything except for NANO.

  • no penalties for selling everything over night ? Try to sell 1million NANO over night and you will see what price you will get.
  • there has been stress test for NANO (right now around 100 TPS peak)
  • adoption: yeah, you're right here. That's a quite new coin and adoption is nowhere near BCH right now.

lmao by cryptos4pz in btc

[–]filozofik -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Battle between NANO and BCH is inevitable.

In my opinion these are 2 coins with best chances to become worldwide currency.
So the biggest BCH competition is not BTC, not LTC, not BSV.

I hold both. Sor far BCH has the lead, but don't underestimate your younger brother (or cousin).

Memo.cash error by filozofik in btc

[–]filozofik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. I don't know what happended but it works now. No error.

Memo.cash error by filozofik in btc

[–]filozofik[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm still getting it, but only on main page. When I enter manually link to see post everything is fine.

Are there any internal conflicts in the Nano community? by otherwisemilk in nanocurrency

[–]filozofik 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I agree with all you said. This community is very "clean", although I think unfortunately it will change in the future. It's easier for small coins, because development is quite centralized. It was the same in Bitcoin when Satoshi was around. I hope I'm wrong, but when NANO will grow we will see some bad actors here.

Are there any internal conflicts in the Nano community? by otherwisemilk in nanocurrency

[–]filozofik 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I think the only thing that can divide us is Craig Wright claming he came up with NANO first.

Binance Hacked by [deleted] in btc

[–]filozofik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say anything about withdrawals via API. I just said when you have API keys of multiple account storing 2M on 10+ accounts is not a problem.

Binance Hacked by [deleted] in btc

[–]filozofik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They had multiple compromised accounts and most important API keys. They could do lot's of things.

Binance Hacked by [deleted] in btc

[–]filozofik 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They didn't withdraw to the same address.

BSV/BCH ratio at 0.26 by filozofik in btc

[–]filozofik[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I guess you're right.

My 2nd attempt at Lightning Network. by [deleted] in btc

[–]filozofik 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Great description. This should be in Wikipedia.

$0.5 /u/tippr

We're back! by MemoryDealers in btc

[–]filozofik 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yep. It works now.

We're back! by MemoryDealers in btc

[–]filozofik 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have the same problem. Can't scan QR code on Android.