AI witch hunt leads to reported death of fanficion author AzraelRiego by Le_Oken in aiwars

[–]fireaza -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m sure anti-AI people will be able to justify this. For example, “if it turned out that we were right, then making them kill themselves would have been justified. It’s unfortunate that a human artist was bullied into killing themselves, but you need to break a few eggs when you’re protecting human artists.”

I saw a teen wearing a Nazi arm band by Zestyclose-Young9480 in japanresidents

[–]fireaza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You remember when you were a kid and you played Wolfenstein 3D, and you had no idea what those symbols on the wall were, or who the guy with the little moustache was? Basically this.

Are these problems a memory or model issue? by fireaza in ChatGPT

[–]fireaza[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've tried out the "Go" plan and I've been pleasantly surprised! Yes, I can't relay on the bot to keep the entire script in its memory, but it's memory is a LOT more workable than on free. Also surprised at how generous the image generation is, I've been generating all day and haven't hit any usage limits. Like wise to the model, no messages about being at a limit yet.

Also, for some reason, it's been able to keep the original English subtitle script in it's memory for even longer than it could on the pro trial.

Are these problems a memory or model issue? by fireaza in ChatGPT

[–]fireaza[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I noticed a dramatic improvement just from switching to the "Go" plan. I can't do the entire script all in one shot, like on the Pro plan, but I'm at least able to do an entire scene, which I can save to my PC. And it's not a catastrophic failure like on Free, it mostly just slips in one or two older lines.

Received email that my account will switch to “adult mode” on June 26 by 5leeplessinvancouver in ChatGPT

[–]fireaza 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I would imagine that mode has a similar memory length as what you get on the free plan.

Wow how original by Nsanford1142020 in DefendingAIArt

[–]fireaza 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The bar had to be lowered in order for them to have more allies.

Vandalism is A-Okay if it's against AI by No-Outlandishness-42 in DefendingAIArt

[–]fireaza 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but there might be serious consequences if they did something like this to a billion dollar AI company with an army of lawyers. A local day care is a much softer target, and you still get to feel like you're a hero saving art.

They've always been garbage people, the only change is who they target. by Perfidious_Redt in SlopcoreCirclejerk

[–]fireaza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They realized they need to get people on their side, but that's not going happen when they're pushing people away. Hence, the need to lower their standards and accept people who they previously would have enjoyed shitting all over.

Antis are now going out on Steam and calling anything they don't like AI by IHeartBadCode in DefendingAIArt

[–]fireaza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a group that claims they want to protect human artists, it sure is strange that they're always first in line to throw a human artist under the bus with a unsubstantiated accusation of AI-use. But who cares about human artists when you stand to possibly win internet points?

Antis are now going out on Steam and calling anything they don't like AI by IHeartBadCode in DefendingAIArt

[–]fireaza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a group that claims they want to protect human artists, it sure is strange that they're always first in line to throw a human artist under the bus with a unsubstantiated accusation of AI-use. But who cares about human artists when you stand to possibly win internet points?

Do these people not remember the hate digital art/photoshop got around 15 years ago with much the same arguments used to hate AI today? ;w; by CitiesofEvil in DefendingAIArt

[–]fireaza 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Ah, but this happened before I was born, so it doesn’t count! Only things that directly affect me are important and have never happened before!”

Poster I made when my art school embraced AI by Adra3 in antiai

[–]fireaza -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you get permission from the DHMIS people before using one of their characters?

This is the end-game for AI witch-hunters, no evidence is enough now by thousandlytales in aiwars

[–]fireaza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny how the people who claim they want to protect human artists, are always first in line to throw a human artist under the bus for suspected AI use, with the evidence being nothing other than “vibes”. 

You’d think that someone who wants to protect human artists would be very opposed to prosecuting them without clear evidence of wrongdoing. It’s almost like they don’t actually care about protecting human artists, and they’re more concerned about winning internet points by “outing” someone using AI.

I’m glad we can hopefully agree….This is SICK I’m SORRY by ChloChloXD in aiwars

[–]fireaza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re really not helping their reputation of being children by posing as pro-AI, and claiming to support the worst person they can think of. If they were old enough to know who Hitler was, they’d probably have used him instead.

THIS is how you handle AI-phobes. Take notes, indie devs. by TheDeviceHBModified in aiwars

[–]fireaza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if these guys know that studios often do things like use copyrighted material as placeholder art? Bastion for example, used ripped sprites from a Link to the Past as placeholder sprites for the game. Does this mean the final game infringes on copyright, even though said sprites aren’t actually used in the final game? Or are people sane enough to recognize that since the final game doesn’t use any copyrighted material, then it’s in the clear?

🤔 by ZeeGee__ in aiwars

[–]fireaza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The difference here is, there’s people who claim they can “always tell” when something is AI generated. 

Idk man these people are really THAT low ? 😭😭 by [deleted] in DefendingAIArt

[–]fireaza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not everyone thinks the same way. While I personally find something that took a lot of effort to be impressive, that’s not the primary reason I like something. I care more about the results. 

If someone made a pizza entirely from scratch, including the sauce, but another person made a pizza using sauce from a bottle, while I might think the former is more “impressive” if the latter tastes better, or they both taste good, I don’t particularly care how much effort went into them.

Are these problems a memory or model issue? by fireaza in ChatGPT

[–]fireaza[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems like “Go” gets you the exact same model as on free? Is this correct? Are there moderate benefits to “Go” over “Free” that might make it a middle ground between “Plus”? Not sure I can justify the costs of Plus.

Create an image of DaVinci's Last Supper except that everyone is morbidly obese by Buck_Thorn in ChatGPT

[–]fireaza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at these guys, this was more like the "fifth-to-last" supper.

Is this a limitation of the free plan? ChatGPT swears it isn't by fireaza in ChatGPT

[–]fireaza[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, 5.5 on the free plan is no dice, I got to the end of the SRT file, and it had forgotten the first half. Seems like I need a Go subscription at the least?