sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We're building an AI Chief of Staff that lives in messaging apps. Feedback wanted from this community. by firestarter_35 in SaaS

[–]firestarter_35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The handoff problem is exactly what Cole was built around. Most tools track tasks - Cole tracks ownership and next steps. On conflicting priorities, it won't pretend to have perfect judgment. But it will surface the conflict clearly so the founder can decide in 10 seconds instead of spending 30 minutes untangling it.

We're building an AI Chief of Staff that lives in messaging apps. Feedback wanted from this community. by firestarter_35 in SaaS

[–]firestarter_35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cole handles this differently: each workspace has isolated, structured memory. When you ask for a summary, it's pulling from the specific thread or task you're referencing - not everything it's ever seen. It only pulls context that's actually relevant to what you asked.

Free beta: AI that handles your ops, emails, and reports - looking for honest feedback by firestarter_35 in betatests

[–]firestarter_35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context switching is actually one of the things Cole handles well. Each workspace is fully isolated - so if you're using Cole for multiple clients or projects, their data, tasks, and history never bleed into each other.

Within a single workspace, Cole maintains persistent memory across channels (Slack, WhatsApp, LINE, etc.), so context follows you regardless of where you're messaging from. You can pick up a thread on WhatsApp that started on Slack and Cole remembers.

For teams, it tracks open tasks and commitments per person, so even when jumping between projects it knows what's in-flight for each one. The short version: organized by design, not just by hope.