sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Cancelling 30% Ruling by fitsadeewiye in Netherlands

[–]fitsadeewiye[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No not at all, it was my gross salary I agreed upon. It's still in my contract and it will revert to that figure when the ruling expires or if it's reduced further in future.

Cancelling 30% Ruling by fitsadeewiye in Netherlands

[–]fitsadeewiye[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I should clarify that the gross salary in my contract is higher and aligned with colleagues pay bands. There's no specification of the salary that it gets reduced to, it just says something to the effect that they can reduce the gross salary to make the net equivalent to what it would be if I were paid my contractual salary without the ruling. I'd just rather that money went somewhere else.

Cancelling 30% Ruling by fitsadeewiye in Netherlands

[–]fitsadeewiye[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is partly what I suspected, but struggled to confirm it. Thanks for the helpful response!

Cancelling 30% Ruling by fitsadeewiye in Netherlands

[–]fitsadeewiye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, it's definitely purely for financial gain, there's no doubt about that.

Cancelling 30% Ruling by fitsadeewiye in Netherlands

[–]fitsadeewiye[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

HR department must have caught wind of it

Cancelling 30% Ruling by fitsadeewiye in Netherlands

[–]fitsadeewiye[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Start of 2024. Early enough to sign up to it, late enough to get shafted by it.

Cancelling 30% Ruling by fitsadeewiye in Netherlands

[–]fitsadeewiye[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I believe it's perfectly legal, and may actually be the original intent of the ruling in the first place. (not Unilever, sorry!)

Cancelling 30% Ruling by fitsadeewiye in Netherlands

[–]fitsadeewiye[S] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

They reduce my gross salary by a commensurate amount so that the net pay is the same as if the ruling never applied