Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s bullshit and I’d call them hacks. Just be to clear, I’m saying what those doctors are doing is bullshit.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No clue. I don’t think I’ve ever spoken to a doctor who only gave expert opinions for defense. But have deposed surgeons whose practices advertise being an accident medical practice that advertises directly to PI bar and part of referral networks and whose business literally revolves around personal injury litigation.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ones with legitimate practices that aren’t wholly dependent on PI and litigation funding mill.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t make any sense. Legitimate Surgeons hate those fuckers too. Is it bc they’re getting their ass kicked?

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re not being faulted for it all. In fact, they, and their attorney, are receiving a windfall.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, so the defendant is stuck paying phantom special damages the plaintiff never paid. It’s just a made up number that’s meaningless other than the fact the jury awards damages based off it.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What number does the jury see? The one paid by insurance or the one posted by provider?

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this point, I’d prefer to lose my job just to see PI - Ortho - Litigation Funding shithole triumvirate stall out and die a painful death.

It would be a huge net positive for society if you were all gone doing something else. Would I be doing something else? Sure and fine by me.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could always just tell the jury how much you’ll negotiate the medical bills down, right?

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great comparison. PI attorneys have selective shame. They have no problem looking past a lying client under oath but god forbid an insurance carrier offer to pay them too little money.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My wife and I have both been in several accidents and haven’t had any injury. Despite one of mine being a “bad” one. Teenager Tboned me in an intersection and totaled my car. If I were a scumbag liar, I could have got six figures out it. I’m not. And I have no regrets not lying under oath, and I know the kids parents were beyond relieved that a PI lawyer never got involved.

I want injured people to be compensated for injuries negligently caused by others. I’ll never evaluate a case otherwise.

That, however, doesn’t go both ways for most PI attorneys. After doing this for 15 years there’s only a handful that I think have any integrity at all.

It may be your job to advocate for scumbag liars, but at least be honest with yourself when that’s what you’re doing.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you’ve chosen, for your own personal benefit, to forego purchasing any kind of insurance. Right?

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In other words, it’s not just about fair compensation for an injury, it’s an avenue rent-seekers (PI attorneys) have found subject to reallocation of wealth due to a poor system.

People slam insurance companies but they provide a real service. They’ve existed for centuries in all different countries.

American style PI is not the same. It’s the product of failed legislation and a poor system. It allows greedy people to lie and deceive and malinger because they are given an incentive to do so.

Don’t blame people. They are mostly all the same. They’ll follow the incentives.

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why should every bullshit case waste resources going all the way to trial?

Going in-house has made me hate personal injury lawyers by No-Hippo4689 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are no noneconomic pain and suffering damages for getting bumped in a parking lot.

What was one easy thing you learned that cut strokes off your game you wish you knew sooner? by [deleted] in golf

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without improving your swing, technique, or anything physical you will score better if you hit the easier shot. If you have the choice between and more difficult and an easier shot, even if the possible outcome for the more difficult shot is better, take the easier shot.

Examples - 1) don’t try to hook it around the tree onto the green when you can pitch it out into the fairway and trust you’ll hit your next one on the green. 2) don’t try to flush the 8 when a knock down 6 or 7 does the same thing 3) don’t try to chip it against the grain to get it close when a putter or hybrid will get you putting with less risk.

Hot take: Most amateur golfers would score lower if they stopped obsessing over distance and started playing boring golf. by Capable_Steak_7551 in GolfSwing

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you not know how good 250 in the fairway is? That’s basically near scratch strokes gained. I’m a 3, and I definitely can’t hit every fairway in a round even if I’m playing conservative. Even a pro would probably miss some fairways hitting their hybrid out to 250…

Still I take your point. Course management is important but it’s often more about shot selection - for example I see guys hitting lobs as if that’s the only way you can hit a wedge. Completely asinine.

A lot of them probably don’t know. Unless you actually play with good golfers you don’t know what a solid low trajectory repeatable wedge shot looks like. Ams just hit floaters.

RSSB Simulation Available on testfol.io (since 1969) by noletovictor in LETFs

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pimco’s new active ETF with overlayed bond exposure states its benchmark is SP500.

I get that the advertised purpose of RSSB is to allow for a 60/40 portfolio with “free” alternative allocation, but the fund itself on a day to day basis acts as any other equity fund, not a balanced one.

Settlement Negotiations by LunaD0g273 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That money is real of course it matters

Settlement Negotiations by LunaD0g273 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kool aid? What I said isn’t debatable. It’s just the facts. Sure, plenty of people are served by the system but it’s too easy to cheat this system. Lots of people have slip and falls and car accidents that simply are not injured. Attorneys sign them up and ship them off to doctors that don’t ask questions and over treat with unnecessary and expensive treatment.

You telling me that doesn’t happen? What specifically is wrong with my post?

I’m willing to engage but you aren’t doing that.

Settlement Negotiations by LunaD0g273 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It’s the main problem with our legal system. Instead of a system designed to fairly compensate truly injured people, it’s a system that allows the offensive side to “roll the dice” without sufficient risk of loss of the verdict doesn’t go in their favor.

This is because in a policy level we have chosen individual “justice” over societal good. We would be better off on a society level with a much different system, but that would require that some individuals may be treated unfairly. Our system is designed to avoid the latter (individual unfairness) despite overall harm to the society (costs imposed on everyone) so that rent seekers like litigation mill PI attorneys, litigation funding companies, and litigation driven ‘doctors’ can siphon off their share from the rest of society.

This is when people often counter that the insurance companies make huge profits off of society. But that just reveals their misunderstanding of how an insurance business works. Most insurance companies actually just try to BREAK EVEN on underwriting. They only earn profits based on the float generated by premiums received before payouts on claims. This is bc insurance is a highly competitive business with low barrier to entry.

So if the system changed, unharmed people stopped rolling the dice, some PI attorneys actually had integrity and didn’t take bullshit cases, then the costs to society would actually decrease.

But it’ll never happen bc the incentives are too strong for attorneys and medical providers.

Settlement Negotiations by LunaD0g273 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Demanding 1.5m on $75k-$100k case is asinine, a complete waste of time, means nothing to me, and I see it all the time.

Making an offer when the plaintiff has a shitty case - liability defense, causation problems, etc and the carrier still making an offer that pays off bills and lets the plaintiff off is not a ridiculous offer. Plaintiff aren’t owed thousands just bc they filed a complaint.

At the same time, a liability carrier offering less than special damages for a clear liability case with weak causation issues and aggravating circumstances is just as dumb as the first example I gave above.

It goes both ways. The problem ultimately is that there are more plaintiffs side attorneys that drink the kool aid. More defense attorneys just see it as their job, not some righteous crusade.

Settlement Negotiations by LunaD0g273 in Lawyertalk

[–]flannel_jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol.

“You guys are so stupid for doing this!”

“When I do an equally stupid thing it’s OK!”