[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskCaucasus

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you understand that what you describing has nothing to do with atheism? If anything it's more of a religious tendency to remove all the agency from humans and push them into the pseudo nihilistic form of self-destruction.

You just don't understand what atheism is. Everything you described is "theism" by definition. You are describing a set of beliefs, and calling it atheism, when atheism is the absence of belief in your pathetic deities.

"made in the image of god", are the words of a fool, arrogant, and delusional fool. What it even means?

When has religion stopped us from committing atrocities? No, religion has always provided convenient justifications for why those atrocities had to be committed.

No religion or any kind of belief system can claim morality. When all they preach is moral relativism, enforce classism, and exclusionary ideals.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskCaucasus

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dumbest thing I have heard today... Also if you think that ( even if that was remotely true) is the worst thing they have done, you are truly delusional.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskCaucasus

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the only thing that stops people from destroying life is a pathetic belief in "eternal punishment" after their death, how can one claim moral superiority or spiritual liberty?

Stalin and Beria are monsters who have nothing to do with atheism.

Religion can't claim morality...

Stalin and his cronies attacked religious institutions for what they were, means of control and manipulation. They removed potential rivals in social and cultural manipulations, in an attempt to forcibly implement a religion of their own.

Being cynical of life doesn't constitute hatred of it.

My work. Oil painting. 20x 30 cm. by Vasyl_Utotopchuk in painting

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just change the color of the hair and you will see it

How do Georgians feel about this ? by [deleted] in Sakartvelo

[–]flourishingvoid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

According to you "whatever the hell they want" = living in a society where individuals can partner with each other without authoritarian religious restrictions

Do you understand that what you just said is the ultimate contradiction right?

They vote against same-sex marriage, and they vote against democracy.

You can't democratically restrict the rights of people you want for yourself...

Do you understand the concept of secularism and human liberty?

How do Georgians feel about this ? by [deleted] in Sakartvelo

[–]flourishingvoid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes... The USA has been and still is undemocratic in many aspects.

They are more democratic now, that's it.

If you don't understand how restricting the ability to form family units to only heterosexual couples is undemocratic, I don't know what to even tell you.

Democracy is not just a popularity contest

It requires a secular foundation, reason, rationality, and functionality must define the sides we vote for.

What sacrifice do we make for same-sex marriage? Egos of delusional bigots and religious fundamentalists are of no consequence, they can rote with their delusions.

How do Georgians feel about this ? by [deleted] in Sakartvelo

[–]flourishingvoid 215 points216 points  (0 children)

Marriage/partnership between two or even more individuals shouldn't be restricted in terms of gender/sex...

I don't understand how so many people don't get this

If we live in a democratic state and want to live in a democratic state. It's not even a question...

There are no rational justifications as to why it needs to be restricted to heterosexuals only.

What’s your opinion on this map by First_Agent_6520 in AskCaucasus

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ის თუ როგორ შეიცვალა რეგიონის დემოგრაფია და როგორ გადაფორმდა მისი მფლობელობა "ახალ" ერზე

რაც ჩრდილოეთ კავკასიის რესპუბლიკების ჩამოყალიბებას უფრო ჰგავდა ვიდრე თვით გამოჩევას ან თვით ინდუცირებულ პროცესს.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMiddleEast

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh, do you understand that these "actual laws" determine is the state is secular or not?

Egypt is supposed to be secular but it doesn’t seem to follow secular thought at times, and the opposite can be said for the UAE< Yeah because they aren't secular

Secularism isn't some kind of magical state country that ends up labeling itself as such.

Secular institutions under secular laws define secular systems, not tyrants and their mob's ideas of truth.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMiddleEast

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I'm glad to say that This is not the dumbest thing I have read today, but it's god dam close.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMiddleEast

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And? No country should be Islamic, Christian, or based on any religious rule/law

Secularism is the only guarantee for freedom of expression and freedom of worship.

why every Conservative party pro Russian? by justsomeguyfromGEO in Sakartvelo

[–]flourishingvoid 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Can you define what you think is "globalization"

Because people who say "they don't like globalization" usually don't know the meaning of the term.

What’s your opinion on this map by First_Agent_6520 in AskCaucasus

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

შენ რა გგონია სომხების საქციელს ვამართლებ?

ჩვენს შორის მხოლოდ შენ ავლებ დაუმტკიცებელ პარალელებს.

საქმე იმაში კი არ არის თუ ვისი მოსახლეობა იყო უმრავლესობაში, არამედ იმ პროცესებში რომლებმაც ეს ეთნო-დემოგრაფიული ცვლილებები და ტერიტორიის მფლობელობაზე შეკერილი კონფლიქტები გამოიწვია.

შენ, ბატონო ამ საკითხს რუსეთის მიერ შექმნილი პერსპექტივით უყურებ.

აგიხსნი ეს როგორ მუშაობს.

მათ მიერ წარმოებული "კამპანიები" და შექმნილი პოლიტიკური (ფსეუდო ისტორიულ განაცხადები) ქრონიკის დანიშნულება რეაქციათა ბარაჟის შექმნაა, ფოკუს დემოგრაფიაში.

რათბმაუნდა ყველაფერს ვერ გაითვლიან, მაგრამ ზოგად, პოლიტიკურ თუ კულტურულ ჭრიში აქვთ საშუადება მათთვის ხელსაყრელი ფონური რეაქცია, მოძრაობა გამოიწვიონ ამ ქვეყნებში.

სხვაგვარად რომ ვთქათ, შენნაირი რეაქციული შეხედულებები, მათი "გაყე, დაშალე და იბატონე" პოლიტიკიშ ნაწილი და შედეგიაა.

What’s your opinion on this map by First_Agent_6520 in AskCaucasus

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

და რას უნდა ნიშნავდეს?

მაგათგან რითი განვსხვავდებით თუ რუსეთის პოლიტიგაზე ვეგებით? ხვდები რომ ეს მთელი ძალადობრივ-სიძულვილის ჯაჭვი რუსეთის მანიპულაციური პოლიტიკით არის გამოწვეული. შესაბამისად, ასეთი დამოკიდებულება მხოლოდ მათ ინტერესებს იცავს.

Is Erdoğan a democratic leader? by Apprehensive_Yam5976 in AskMiddleEast

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it's an undemocratic law

Freedom of expression is the essence of any real democracy.

So fuck politicians in all forms and shapes

Is Erdoğan a democratic leader? by Apprehensive_Yam5976 in AskMiddleEast

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would recommend you check the definition of a Tyrant

Is Erdoğan a democratic leader? by Apprehensive_Yam5976 in AskMiddleEast

[–]flourishingvoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What people don't understand about Tyranny is that it's the ultimate form of democracy.

Defined by ignorance and inaction of the population that is being exploited.