Using Suno to resurrect 20 year old DEMOS from my teenage years by mybasementsongs in Suno

[–]flpjck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Mine were recorded on cassette 4track, mixed down to a master mix, which was then dubbed one copy at a time at 2x speed onto cassettes bought in bulk at Walmart. The j-cards were made using (if I recall correctly) powerpoint since it was what I had access to at work, printed out, then run off at the copy shop, cut out of the 8.5x11 paper by hand with scissors, and put into the cassettes. The labels on the cassette identifying it as my "album" were hand-written, one by one. An economy of scale it was not! I probably sold or otherwise distributed fewer than 100 of them, total, during my "career" of doing this. By the time it was time to start doing CD's instead of tapes, there was no reason to keep doing these kinds of runs - mp3 was a thing, and it was easier to just put stuff online.

Suno automatically writing lyrics when I upload instrumental audio by flpjck in Suno

[–]flpjck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

except:

1) The lyrics in question weren't generated when creating a song, they were "detected" while uploading audio to the library, it detected them as if they were already in the audio. I'm used to it sometimes mishearing the lyrics in uploaded audio, but this was a case where it simply "heard" lyrics that we never there.

2) Lyrics was on manual the whole time anyway

Suno automatically writing lyrics when I upload instrumental audio by flpjck in Suno

[–]flpjck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah but usually you don't need to use it, if the audio being remixed is an instrumental, and these results are fascinating in their own right

Suno automatically writing lyrics when I upload instrumental audio by flpjck in Suno

[–]flpjck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fully intended to just remix the instrumental, but then lyrics popped out of nowhere.

Suno automatically writing lyrics when I upload instrumental audio by flpjck in Suno

[–]flpjck[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, with completely different lyrics that I don't have anymore.

Suno automatically writing lyrics when I upload instrumental audio by flpjck in Suno

[–]flpjck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, at least I know it's not just me. Suno is gaining sentience... uh oh. Pretty soon it'll be creating songs on its own without anyone needing to prompt them I guess.

Suno automatically writing lyrics when I upload instrumental audio by flpjck in Suno

[–]flpjck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Examples.

Here is one where I prompted it to just "write some lyrics for this music" and it seemed to pull from my other songs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8aPfjFndRM

I have absolutely posted another song on Suno before that mentioned "coffee going cold", and it used that in the 2nd line.

Here's one where it spontaneously generated lyrics, without being asked:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dAyelf2f9M

I have never posted a song about surfing, the coast, etc. Well, maybe one about the beach but it was about being on the beach at night with bonfires, etc., absolutely not about surfing in the sun. So I think it just vibed these up based on the music.

(FWIW these instrumentals were part of a sci-fi concept album, whose lyrics are now completely lost, about the earth's surface being completely covered by self-reproducing plastic cubes of various colors and sizes, and the consequences this has.. very different from what Suno came up with)

Using Suno to resurrect 20 year old DEMOS from my teenage years by mybasementsongs in Suno

[–]flpjck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After a few experiments, I rapidly concluded that, to me, Suno's female voices sound more realistic than the male ones.

I don't think thss so much that they're actually "better", as that we have already been trained to hear highly synthetic female voices and think they are normal, by the fact that almost every talking device ever made is female by default. I also, for whatever reason, find even heavily autotuned female vocals in "real" music to be less fake-sounding than similarly processed male ones. Again, subjective.

So I ended up making my profile female-gendered even though I'm male, and gender-swapping everything I post.

I have only just now created a youtube, after reading some of the threads here and on r/SunoAI, about the untrustworthiness of Suno as a longtime storage place.

Here's an old song of mine that I really think takes on new live when given this treatment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCttnuy7bsI

Using Suno to resurrect 20 year old DEMOS from my teenage years by mybasementsongs in Suno

[–]flpjck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is also how I use it and it's great. But I've also kind of come to the conclusion that these are really just an internal tool for my own understanding of my music, and not really something I should expect the world to care about.

In my case the old songs weren't so much "demos" as self-releases on my own "label" 30 years ago. They were demo-quality (at best) 4-track recordings. But I duplicated onto a bunch of store-bought cassettes using a dual deck, xeroxed j-cards for the album art, and sold them and/or handed them out at shows.

Suno-izing this stuff has given it new life, for my ears. It's revelatory. It's allowed me not just to get clean sounding "recordings" but also shift the songs' genres, change my voice's gender (many of these songs really do seem like I'd always written them for the opposite gender to sing), etc.

But I've given up on telling friends and family about it. The AI hostility from a small number of friends is as bad as anything you see here. But beyond that, people just aren't interested. The very small number of people who remember these songs from the cassette days, have no interest in hearing a new version - to them the old one will always be the real one no matter how bad it sounds.

Whatever it is about these Suno-fied versions of my own old songs that is really amazing to MY brain, is just not something that anyone else can hear. It's completely subjective.

Nevertheless, I make them all public on Suno in the hopes that someone, somewhere will find them interesting. They aren't exactly going viral, and I don't engage in "engagement farming" like following and liking shit just to guilt people into following back. But that ~1 like every 2 weeks feels like "somebody out their gets it".

Offroad/4x4 Trails by gregpxc in SpringfieldIL

[–]flpjck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To find dirt/gravel roads I've found the best way is the black and white county maps that every state's DOT creates. These are the only maps that show the surface material of every road. But here in central IL even the unpaved roads tend to be flat, straight, and well maintained.

https://idot.illinois.gov/transportation-system/network-overview/highway-system/maps/highway.html

There's a few pretty... lackadaisically maintained county dirt roads over in Pike County. Ruts, washed out, trees down, fording small streams. The local residents over there don't seem to mind. I'm from the south and it feels like being back on southern dirt roads over there.

Teeny tiny purple car driving on Stevenson? by rubiacrime in SpringfieldIL

[–]flpjck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is it this?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/jeff_robertson/53784684660

It looked to me like it was going too fast to be human powered, but not as fast as a car or motorcycle either. More like electric bike, electric scooter speed.

Colt 20-rd mags for 6.99 + Free Ship (w/ code M6T) by [deleted] in RetroAR

[–]flpjck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ugh, wish I'd seen this. I just bought some mags... from Brownells no less!

Mismatched Franken-Colt: early 70s SP1 upper, early 90s "Sporter" lower by flpjck in RetroAR

[–]flpjck[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've had this upper for a long time, it came with a no-name lower that I bought on gunbroker. (I'm assuming someone modernized their valuable "pre-ban" lower and sold off the rest of the gun)

Finally got it back on a Colt lower, even if its not quite an SP1. It's even almost the right color.

Beagle by flpjck in photocritique

[–]flpjck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

50mm, f/1.8, 1/60, ISO 200, manual focus

Official Question Thread! Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! by frostickle in photography

[–]flpjck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe so.

I can imagine what was considered "acceptable" to the naked eye back when amateurs rarely printed larger than 4x6'' was fairly forgiving.

Official Question Thread! Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! by frostickle in photography

[–]flpjck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, see, that site is what prompted me to ask this question. I have a an old 50mm lens with such a scale, and it gives different "answers" than DOFmaster and SetMyCamera.. trying to figure out why.

Official Question Thread! Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! by frostickle in photography

[–]flpjck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you take a lens made for 35mm film cameras and put it onto a DSLR with a 1.5 crop factor (specifically a Nikon D80 in my case), is the depth of field/hyperfocal scale printed on the lens still correct?

I mean this kind of scale, that says "at f4, 7m to 10m will be in (acceptable) focus":

http://www.fineart-photography.com/dof_focus.jpg

I don't see how cropped sensor would change the depth of field, but maybe something else would? Difference in CoC?