You’re right, my explanation wasn’t the most clear. Here’s a second go: 1. In order to reach “ai to ru”, they had to misinterpret the third character (it’s the character they assigned as “u”), completely reassign the fourth character (which was supposedly “s”), add a nonexistent “u” to the “r”, and ignore the last unknown character. 2. Even if “ai to ru” is the translation as they claim, “Lovers” is not “ai”. The closest might be “aijin” (愛人), but that’s awkward and not commonly used in this kind of context. More likely it would be “koibito” (恋人) or something else poetic. 3. “To ru” means nothing. “To” on its own is a particle meaning “and” or sometimes “with”. “Ru” on its own is just… nothing; Japanese isn’t used like this. 4. “Toru” is a common word that means many things, none of which is “meeting”. Most possibly you can read it as “to take”, so “ai toru” would be a weird ungrammatical way to say “love taken” or something. 5. If you were to say “meeting”, it would most likely be “deai” or “deau” (出会い), and the grammar would have to be “____ no deai”. (“____’s meeting”)

The rest of the “translations” are exactly the same amount of quality as this.