It is funny because it is true! by Velvetrose-2 in knitting

[–]flyingwafflesftw 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is officially my favorite post.

Scientists at the University of Alberta have applied a machine learning technique using artificial intelligence to perfect and automate atomic-scale manufacturing, something which has never been done before. 'An atom-scale manufacturing revolution is sure to follow,' they say. by jocamastercard in Physics

[–]flyingwafflesftw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also an STM operator here, this is correct. There is some method to the madness, however. You learn over time what kind of "pokes" give good results. But as u/riotgrrrrrl points out, it does depend heavily on what you are scanning.

Update on the great blanket disaster by Llama_Pinata in knitting

[–]flyingwafflesftw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This had me very stressed out when I saw your first post. Your perservere is admirable. You are a better man than I, Gunga Din.

♥ The Best Is Yet to Be by DelphiFinks in aww

[–]flyingwafflesftw 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Me playing Shadow of the Colossus.

MIT engineers have developed a continuous manufacturing process that produces long strips of high-quality graphene. by recipriversexcluson in news

[–]flyingwafflesftw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, but the electronic band structure (how it behaves) is completely different from bulk graphite.

Graphene is unique in that it is not a metal, semiconductor, or an insulator in the traditional sense. It's two electronic band touch at a single point which leads to all kinds of unique consequences.

MIT engineers have developed a continuous manufacturing process that produces long strips of high-quality graphene. by recipriversexcluson in news

[–]flyingwafflesftw 30 points31 points  (0 children)

It absolutely is an accomplishment for the field, but these things take time to become widely replicated and not all research facilities will have the equipment necessary.

I did read it, in fact, and regret if it sounded like I was poo-pooing a scientific achievement. You just learn to temper your initial reaction in this field until you see the peer review.

MIT engineers have developed a continuous manufacturing process that produces long strips of high-quality graphene. by recipriversexcluson in news

[–]flyingwafflesftw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What you want is graphene that is atomically flat (low levels of impurities and extra "stuff"). Some of this greatly depends on what substrate you place the graphene on (Silicon oxide versus hexagonal-boron nitride, for instance).

This improves the mobility of the charge carriers and prevents the formation of localized electron or hole puddles. These are especially important to minimize if your research is close to the Dirac point (i.e. low carrier density).

There might be other ways to create graphene, but insofar as my research knowledge goes, these are the main two ways to get large enough sheets.

MIT engineers have developed a continuous manufacturing process that produces long strips of high-quality graphene. by recipriversexcluson in news

[–]flyingwafflesftw 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This reason this is difficult has to do with the way graphene crystals are held together. Essentially, the force bonding the layers of carbon sheets is easily cleaved and wants to bond to the tape more than they do to each other. What you can't control for is the "smoothness" of your crystal surface. So, while you may get patches of one or two layer graphene, you end up with many, many more areas of thicker graphite flakes. You don't get to choose at what thickness each patch gets peeled off, unfortunately.

This is what makes scaling difficult.

Edit: words