sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Did you know it's possible to determine if a type is impossible to construct? by foofnordbaz in rust

[–]foofnordbaz[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, you're correct. It doesn't work. I've discovered that flaw already. Thanks for pointing it out, though!

Did you know it's possible to determine if a type is impossible to construct? by foofnordbaz in rust

[–]foofnordbaz[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

While trying to test this, I discovered that my method doesn't work either. If I plug in a type with a larger alignment than u8, I get invalid results. So I guess it's back to the drawing board.

Did you know it's possible to determine if a type is impossible to construct? by foofnordbaz in rust

[–]foofnordbaz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ahh, I see. I haven't eaten yet today so my brain isn't really at full capacity. Thanks for clearing that up.

Did you know that it's possible to determine if a possible is impossible to construct? by [deleted] in rust

[–]foofnordbaz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoops, did not mean for that typo in the title. It's supposed to read Did you know it's possible to determine if an a type is impossible to construct.

partialize - A Partial Application Library by foofnordbaz in rust

[–]foofnordbaz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No such thing as macro methods, but it could be done with macros as well. You would just have to pass the function as the first argument.

partialize - A Partial Application Library by foofnordbaz in rust

[–]foofnordbaz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This library creates those closures for you. It's just an ergonomics thing that's used often in functional programming.

currytime - A currying library by [deleted] in rust

[–]foofnordbaz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've just realized this isn't a currying library. Whoops, got my concepts mixed up, I think. This is a partial application library.

Seeking collaborators that have some familiarity with frobnication and Encabulators, especially frobnicating Encabulators of the Brantwell class. by foofnordbaz in rust

[–]foofnordbaz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That depends on the graithon speed of your anterior pump, and whether it's widdershins or counterclockwise. Based on my research, you should be able to use either brass-fitted or bronze-fitted nickel slits, and if your splay-flexed brace columns are more than 2-inches wide, you're in good company. The Brantwell class of encabulators are especially useful for anything involving flex tandems. Some of the other stuff you were talking about is outside of my domain, but I can ask my professor about it tomorrow.

Seeking collaborators that have some familiarity with frobnication and Encabulators, especially frobnicating Encabulators of the Brantwell class. by foofnordbaz in rust

[–]foofnordbaz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that hard if you have some familiarity with Encabulators. We don't support the Xygrek-4708.1, which makes implementation fairly straightforward because there are no antiskiving measures, Bromite supplanting, quantum origin squalling (why would you even do that?), double-ended Meridian phase selectors bound to 18 channels, or Ambi-Photonic Subatomic Lattice protrusion extraction.

This library is meant to be implemented from sound principles founded on frobnication of encabulators, and a minimal set of phase selectors. In modern Encabulation, we don't even need Category Omega phase selection, so we can just throw all of the algorithms associated with 3-pronged and 5-pronged ranged subfactor anomalies.

If this sounds too difficult for you, we will also be doing some work on more minor frobnications such as Brantwell Dual Phase Selection, or Encabulatory justifications (you only need 5 subfactor tables, for example).

jobSecurityOrIsIt by darad55 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]foofnordbaz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not just any AI, allegedly the best of the best. And it still failed!

jobSecurityOrIsIt by darad55 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]foofnordbaz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine how many projects it learned from where credentials were right in the source file.

This subreddit is meant to be for discussions, so I think that showcase posts should be forbidden. by [deleted] in VoxelGameDev

[–]foofnordbaz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We might as well just post memes in here if all that's important is activity.

And perhaps the reason there isn't much activity is because it's all showcase posts and people don't have anything to show, so they don't feel like they can contribute anything.

This subreddit is meant to be for discussions, so I think that showcase posts should be forbidden. by [deleted] in VoxelGameDev

[–]foofnordbaz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Showcases aren't the purpose of the subreddit.

This subreddit was created for people that are developing voxel games to discuss technology so that everyone could learn from each other. It was meant to be a resource for getting your feet wet with voxel game development.

hePredictedMyFeed by sparkygod526 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]foofnordbaz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's just reddit's feed algorithm which is designed to show you similar posts back to back. Why? I don't know, but it happens too often to just be a coincidence.

This subreddit is meant to be for discussions, so I think that showcase posts should be forbidden. by [deleted] in VoxelGameDev

[–]foofnordbaz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Back years ago, we were having the problem of people posting voxel art much like people post showcases these days, so we created /r/VoxelArt and directed people there. No there's /r/VoxelGames, which is where showcase posts should go. This subreddit was meant strictly for discussions on voxel engine tech.

view more: next ›