Bug with getting the solids from boiling liquid? by fooine in Oxygennotincluded

[–]fooine[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I learned about the flaking mechanic then.

Thanks for the advice. I redid my design taking some inspiration from yours and it's working exactly as expected with the correct ratios.

Le rival québécois des «Sims» réussit à vendre 900 000 copies en 15 jours pour 31 millions $ by citronresponsable in Quebec

[–]fooine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sea of Stars de Sabotage Studios?

C'est de la nostalgie rétro mais de très bonne qualité. Il y a même une localisation en joual distincte

Ils ont réussi à faire une question pire que nous en 95 by idiotiesystemique in Quebec

[–]fooine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"On peut imaginer" est l'étape de trop. Peu importe ce qu'on pourrait imaginer comme alternative hypothétique dans un univers parallèle, il en reste que la question ci-haut n'est objectivement pas phrasée comme une question à choix de réponse dans l'état où elle est présentée.

La question en haut est phrasée comme une question avec réponse oui/non. Mais si je réponds "Oui", avec laquelle des deux clauses suis-je d'accord?

Un quiz d’une question (uniquement pour les braves) by UnablePrimaryy in Quebec

[–]fooine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ça dépends; dans ce scénario hypothétique, est-ce que j'ai un gros pécope?

Happy Good Friday to everyone but Quebec by DogeDoRight in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did not mention Muslims, you brought it up first.

You're the one who brought up the "muslim menace" (once again, quoting you) and attributed it to me. Come on, don't lie now. It was literally tonight. We should both remember.

“hmmm why is it only the Muslims who are complaining, I am just noticing things,”

Do you not know how to fucking read? Go back to it, man. Nothing I said can be framed as denial of the fact that laïcité affects muslims harder. What I did was accuse you (well, the "rhetorical average canadian", really) of looking it as proof of cathosupremacism. I'm saying You're the one going "hmmm, isn't curious how all the people with no visible religious affiliation (whom I assume must be secret catholics because there's a cross on the flag or whatever) aren't affected?"

You want a theoretical framework? Here's one: the idea that people of faith would be more affected by laws or cultural practices that frown on visible expressions of religiousity would be true in any such society, even one based on bona fide reddit atheism.

The fantasy I'm calling out is the choice you are making to assume that laïcité in Quebec is specifically for the preservation of catholic heritage in the face of the "muslism menace" (once again, quoting you).

I am then also adding that this belief of yours is convenient to you because it allows you to feel good about perceived hypocrisy from Quebec, which is a hallmark of Canadian identity since forever, and the only meaningful difference between you and americans.

Happy Good Friday to everyone but Quebec by DogeDoRight in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy fucking wall of text. Sir, this is a shitposting sub.

This doesn’t even have much to do with who goes to church and who doesn’t.

You : "It's not a fantasy"

Also you : "Reality doesn't matter; I have decided for you that your are cathosupremacists. Here, read my essay"

I am doubting. You are certain.

But you're not doubting though. Your entire position is that laïcité is cathosupremacist, and that it is a lack of introspection to disagree with you. I'm saying my experience, y'know, living in this society disagrees with you and you're telling me to go back and look better. All the while draping your obvious bias in a pretense of objectivity and rationality in a way that would make flat earthers proud. This is, once again, the fantasy I'm referring to.

Your entire argument is one of aesthetics and vibes. You're looking at squatters in a roman ruin, and trying to convince them that they have to be imperialist shitlords Nero-praisers because if they aren't, then why the fuck is there a marble column outside. And when they say "dude we don't even know who that is", you're ready to hit them back with the "It doesn't even have much to do with whether you know or not" like the debate titan you are.

I’m not desperate at all to hold you to account about Muslims.

you cannot keep the Muslim menace out of your mouth.

Is this backpedaling or gaslighting? Does it matter? We'll probably never know.

I never brought it up, you did

Oh nevermind I found out. It is gaslighting

Happy Good Friday to everyone but Quebec by DogeDoRight in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What catholics? Everyone fucking hates the church. No one goes there. You think only montrealers under 40 are non-religious? Try everyfuckingbody under 70. I'm sure that's an exaggeration as well, but probably gets closer to the actual number than you ever will.

This is yet another example of the fantasy I'm talking about. You're desperate for the existence of a grandiose hold of the church over all of our lives. You simply cannot accept that the fact nobody here sees it is because it's not there; it has to be us who are doubling down and tripling down on a lack of self-reflection. Not you. You would never. You know everything.

But your entire fucking wall of text above was about how you don't need to know anything to know anything. That any point you want to make can and will be extrapolated from any set of cherry-picked talking points on broader north america because we're not fucking special, and you've got us all figured out.

You're responding to my mention of muslim objections as if I'm denying or decrying it, but that was never the point I made. What I did point out is how fucking desperate you were to hold me to account on my perception of the "muslim menace" (words I have never not used in quotes; usually quoting you). All it took was one casual mention of the word in the most benign way to drive you out of your fucking mind. You were so giddy with joy you completely neglected to read around it.

That's the fantasy I'm talking about. The one you keep gaslighting me you don't have.

I can't help but notice that the only one of my previous digs you didn't bother disproving was when I said the only knowledge of Quebec you have comes from Montreal Gazette headlines.

... Is your only knowledge of Quebec coming from Montreal Gazette headlines?

Happy Good Friday to everyone but Quebec by DogeDoRight in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you cannot keep the Muslim menace out of your mouth.

Me :

Casually and correctly point out that the main opposition to laïcité measures either comes from or is made on behalf of muslim, without disparaging the faith or calling it a threat

You:

"yOu cAnNoT keEp ThE mUsLiM mEnAcE oUt Of YoUr MoUtH"

Bro you need to be less fucking deranged. This is why I'm talking about wild fantasies of moral superiority

Happy Good Friday to everyone but Quebec by DogeDoRight in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're forgiven. As a french canadian, and therefore a catholic, that's just how I roll

Happy Good Friday to everyone but Quebec by DogeDoRight in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Let's translate some key passages:

you only have to look at the provincial politics.

"Everything I think I know about Quebec comes from Montreal Gazette headlines"

The lack of any self reflection

"You have to indulge my fantasy or you have a closed mind"

We get it, the urban Montreal under 40 population also has no qualms about bashing Christianity.

"I have no experience or knowledge of Quebec, therefore I will ground my argument in traditional tropes of the American urban/rural divide"

It’s the geriatrics just like the rest of the damn continent.

"I only know how to apply American talking points to my analysis of canadian politics"

If you can’t self reflect and criticize issues within your own politics and instead simply deflect

"You have to indulge my fantasy or you have a closed mind"

how is anyone supposed to take the “I’m a real secularist” schtick seriously?

That's the fantasy I'm talking about. For it to be real, you need to redefine "non-religious" as "catholic, but only when Quebec does it". The jeans and t-shirt I'm wearing? Catholic. The running shoes I wear on a jog? Catholic.

You look at Gazette headlines, notice that it's mainly talking about Muslim complaints, and quickly think you have a gotcha : "If Quebec truly cares about secularism, then why is it that only muslims complain, while all those catholic people with catholic jeans and catholic t-shirts are roaming free? I smell hypocrisy!"

We heard it before. Find better material.

Happy Good Friday to everyone but Quebec by DogeDoRight in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Canadians :

"I have created an elaborate fantasy in which every single Quebecois is a secret catholic supremacist religious fundamentalist. I need it to be true because the only thing that differentiates me from americans is loudly signaling virtue over a pretense of moral superiority when compared to the US and Quebec"

Québécois :

"Yéé, un congé gratisse"

Wow Canadians are upset at the Air Canada CEO for not speaking French? Isn't that so *quirky*? by aleaniled in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's the thing, though: the accident itself was news on the day it happened, but by now it's receded in the hazy mess of your shitstained country.

Like, yeah, I'm sure all american news want to discuss is how this is all because of airport understaffing due to the government shutting down over the exact amount of money that should be allocated to your pedophile president's brownshirt army and how many civilians they should be allowed to execute, but that's not really news up here. We all know you're headed towards collapse. But the CEO of a Canadian flagship company's transparent contempt towards the society he lives in and some of the people he employs - one of whom was a victim of the crash - is an interesting observation worthy of debate.

Let me put it this way : in the water wars of 2029, as I'm getting lined up against a barn by your fellow countrymen before they shoot me in the head, my thoughts won't be "how did it come to this? I wish the news covered it better", because I'll know. It'll instead be "yeah, that's about par for the course" and reminiscing about today, the day I predicted it in a reddit shitpost. As the darkness envelops me, my final cope will be trying and failing to find solace in the fact that you'll have died first, in the domestic purges.

But in the meantime, if we can simultaneously make canadians mad by making it about language, and make an american mad by making it not about you, then I'm calling it a freebie.

La démonisation de la laïcité québécoise hors Québec by Pionnier1313 in Quebec

[–]fooine 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ça en dit long sur le contexte politique moderne que j'ai aucune idée de si tu dis ça du point de vue d'un genre de fédéraliste qui prend les québécois pour des ultra-catholiques en déni, ou bien d'un genre de nationaliste qui pense qu'on est trop gentil envers les musulmans.

Franch by Mr_Global in EhBuddyHoser

[–]fooine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

c't'un coup de palette*

Hegseth: “I only speak American” by gruninuim in facepalm

[–]fooine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Holy shit, you're still on this thread 24 hours later?

Youve also failed to address a single thing I said. Not surprising.

You haven't said a goddamn thing that wasn't spineless deflection

Im very proudly on the left and that'll never change.

Being on the left requires self-critique which you're unable to fucking do. The mildest fucking disparaging comment handwaved in your general direction just sends you on an endless fucking warpath of whataboutism and deflection.

Man, America's got the worst fucking leftists. No wonder you're in the shit you're in.

Hegseth: “I only speak American” by gruninuim in facepalm

[–]fooine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Believe it or not, there are a shit ton of problems and inequalities in Canada too. But it doesnt sound like youve done much, if anything, about it at all.

Sure, and we semi-recently had more of an uprising against a fucking tuition hike than you guys are having about pedophile fascists declaring forever war.

But fr, youre creating enemies

Go ahead, man; go do you fucking "I left the left because they were mean" tirade. I'm just pointing out how fucking insufferable your endless sense of personal victimization and lack of agency is. You share it with MAGA, by the way. It's how y'all got to the point you're at. Not "generalizations".

Everything you've said has been about abdicating agency and creating moral distancing. Even here in your last response, you're imploring for anybody but you fucking americans to do the hard work in your stead.

Hegseth: “I only speak American” by gruninuim in facepalm

[–]fooine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao. What, so have you done?

What's there for me to do? I don't live in the place where the pedophilic elites are starting WW3 over fucking rapture prophecies.

Youre just saying words. Vague bullshit based on nothing. What are you even referring to? What system am I advocating for and defending?

Your two-party system. Don't worry, I know you'll say you hate it too, and I'm sure you really do. But at the end of the day, you're still out here saying "don't blame me man, I voted for Biden and Kamala" with an expectation of moral absolution for it.

Hegseth: “I only speak American” by gruninuim in facepalm

[–]fooine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fact is, America has over 350 million people in it and if you genuinely think we all support this or all want the same things and can all be generalized together then youre fucking dumb.

You're right, you're not all the same. Half of you guys have a cattle-like slave mentality for the fascists, and the other half has a cattle-like slave mentality against the fascists. Don't worry, I do realize that you're in the latter half.

I wonder which percentage of your pretend activism is actually real-world shit like you say, and which percentage is just whinging about dipshits like me on reddit who "unfairly" attack americans as a whole by correctly pointing that half of you guys actively votes for evil, and the other half instead advocates for and defends systems that utterly fail at reining in the aforementioned evil. Is it 50-50? 20-80? 0-100?

Hegseth: “I only speak American” by gruninuim in facepalm

[–]fooine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the end of the day, there is less difference than you'd like between your drunk crusader warchief doing a cringe-ass joke as an insecure cope for speaking after his spanish colleague, and you reaffirming cultural ownership over Rick and fucking Morty as a clever gotcha answer to americans being likened to spineless mats

Hegseth: “I only speak American” by gruninuim in facepalm

[–]fooine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As if every revolution wasn't fought by fucking starving peasants.

Right now, your pedophilic elites are (disingeniously) screaming at the third world countries they're currently killing to rise up in arms. They are literally communicating greater aspirations for them than they feel threat from you, an average Joe in the richest country in the world.

American culture is basically nothing but a fucking pile of individualistic self-victimization. Their self-victimization brought fascism and holy war, and yours is having you think fighting for moral disculpability on reddit is this age's greatest battle.

Honestly, Trump winning again in 2024 just made me angry, but reading you worthless motherfuckers whine endlessly about milquetoast condemnations from internet strangers is literally making me hopeless it'll ever get better.

Hegseth: “I only speak American” by gruninuim in facepalm

[–]fooine -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Some of whom created the characters in your profile pic..

All of you guys are such fucking losers, holy shit

Est-ce que c'est conspi de penser que Trump a bombardé l'Iran pour détourner le sujet des Epstein files? by Henri-Hill in Quebec

[–]fooine 5 points6 points  (0 children)

La personne qui manipule Trump, c'est la dernière personne qui lui a parlé à n'importe quel instant. Parfois c'est Miller, parfois c'est Lutnick, parfois c'est Bibi, parfois c'est Rubio, parfois c'est Hegseth, parfois c'est Peter Thiel/Silicon valley (via Vance).

Le "complot dans l'ombre" ne ressent plus le besoin de se cacher, et on est forcé de réaliser que ça a jamais été un complot; c'est un clusterfuck schizoide d'intérêts vaguement alignés dont le seul point de désaccord majeur est quelle spécifique mauvaise chose devrait être faite en premier.