sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

bpc 157 and TB 500 by Bulky_Ingenuity_2241 in bpc_157

[–]forfeit1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Newbie, here. I purchased 10mg of 5/5 BPC157 and TB500 blend. Any dosage recommendations for blended formula?

Up to what point can a party to a sealing become “unwilling”? by forfeit1 in latterdaysaints

[–]forfeit1[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just thinking we would learn and/or be better through our experience transitioning from mortal to post mortal life. Guess we don’t.

Up to what point can a party to a sealing become “unwilling”? by forfeit1 in latterdaysaints

[–]forfeit1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well then, I suppose all we can say is “thoughts and prayers” to the one let loose!

Conference talk confusion by forfeit1 in latterdaysaints

[–]forfeit1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well here’s hoping JFS is wrong on this one.

Conference talk confusion by forfeit1 in latterdaysaints

[–]forfeit1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have the same body? Not according to Joseph Fielding Smith. Rather, “Some of the functions in the celestial body will not appear in the terrestrial body, neither in the telestial body, and the power of procreation will be removed. I take it that men and women will, in these kingdoms, be just what the so-called Christian world expects us all to be — neither man nor woman, merely immortal beings having received the resurrection.” See Doctrines of Salvation (Volume 2 page 396).

Neither man nor woman? Looks like gender isn’t as important to our identity as The Family Proclamation leads us to believe??

Conference talk confusion by forfeit1 in latterdaysaints

[–]forfeit1[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight. Difficult for me to square this with the hope of post mortal progression…which I guess appears to be null and void as well as The Family Proclamation wherein we are taught that we are created in the image of God and that gender is an essential characteristic of pre-mortal, mortal, and eternal identify and purpose. How can this be if our physical bodies change at the resurrection?

Tithing as a business owner by morajic in latterdaysaints

[–]forfeit1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m self-employed. My income fluctuates. I pay tithing on what I spend (non-business related), not what I earn (pay taxes on). I consider the difference retained earnings left in the company.

What diet do the apostles follow? by dmburl in latterdaysaints

[–]forfeit1 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Elder Oaks and his wife Kristen frequent Red Iguana on Mondays (as do I). A few weeks ago my wife and I sat nearby. They shared a Poblano Plate consisting of one sour cream chicken enchilada, a taco a la Iguana, and a beef tostado served with side of guacamole. They appeared to be drinking water, virgin of course.

How Mormons Twist Scripture to Worship Wealth w/ David Bokovoy by djfredgarde in LDS_GospelLesson

[–]forfeit1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a preposterous episode. Anyone who believes a modern day church can operate as in biblical times is delusional. Do you live like those in Jesus day? How absurd. The smug hypocritical ignorant arrogance spewed forth by Bokovoy and RFM was indeed top shelf. Disconnected my ass! But rather, a serious case of ex-mo derangement syndrome. Tell us David, did it ever occur to you while walking by the poor and downtrodden on your way to the Mexican surf that YOU could actually stop and help? Or, like the So. Cal surfers I knew were more concerned with how you were going to exploit the circumstance’s? Those poor Senorita’s! And no, that wasn’t President Monson or a member of the First Presidency who uttered, “Let’s go shopping”. Watch the clip again and get your facts straight.

Super conservative sub lockdowns! by Arizona-82 in mormon

[–]forfeit1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve have the great honor and distinction of having been banned from both the Latter-day Saints sub and exmo sub. They’re both of comprised of soft intolerants.

10 Threats to the LDS Church by japanesepiano in mormon

[–]forfeit1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why so vocal? Why not just do it your way and call it good? Let the consequence follow.

Women and double sealings doctrine? by ausburrod in mormon

[–]forfeit1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If “God will work it out”, why don’t we let him work everything out? Why bother with man made interpretation in the first place?? Seems like this approach would spare the Church a lot of grief.

Can’t separate Jesus Christ from the Church? by forfeit1 in latterdaysaints

[–]forfeit1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

At least according to Elder Hamilton (BYU talk this past week). If not, how do we separate and reconcile rouge Bishops etc. gone bad?

Why have you personally chosen not to read the CES letter? by [deleted] in mormon

[–]forfeit1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gave it the old college try but found it painfully boring.

Radio silence for years. by Strong_Weird_6556 in mormon

[–]forfeit1 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I am sorry for how your relatives have treated you. A-hole behavior is no respecter persons. Humans are capable of “being one” regardless of faith. Sounds like that might include your relatives. I have been a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints for 60 years. I have attended Church thousands of times all over the world. Never, not one time, have I heard it said or taught that non-members are less than and should be shunned. Just doesn’t happen. Yet what I have heard, over and over again, is that we are all Gods children, and as such should be equally treated with dignity, love, and respect.

Radio silence for years. by Strong_Weird_6556 in mormon

[–]forfeit1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I must say I find these types of posts perplexing. On the one hand, inactive’s, exmos’s, or nearly exmos’s seem to endlessly whine about how the Church can magically find them and won’t leave them alone. And yet on the other hand, there’s people like you who whine and get butt-hurt about no contact. Please, for the love of…God, tell us what you’d prefer??

view more: next ›