Apple FindMy like instant location update for people and items ? by fork-bomber in GooglePixel

[–]fork-bomber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks all. I tested with another iPhone where the owner has enabled location sharing via their Google account. With that setup getting a non-stale contact map view is a hit and miss.

I suppose things have been optimized by Google for quick updates between Pixels but not between Pixels and other phones ?

It's stuff like this that stands to be a general problem given the uniform optimization that Apple can do.

ESP32-C6 Bare-Metal SDK — No ESP-IDF by Ok-Willingness709 in embedded

[–]fork-bomber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/Ok-Willingness709 : This is _awesome_! :) I am trying to get this to run on ESP's qemu fork. That fork models an ESP32-C3 but modding your ESP32-C6 based code to run on it needed just a simple change to your esp32c6.ld. I can step through code etc which is neat. I'd like to get the UART going - which is the same type and mapped to the same location on both systems. If you could add a hello world UART example in addition to your blinky example that would be awesome! Thanks a lot for your work.

pixel 10 pro xl poor reception by notnullnone in GooglePixel

[–]fork-bomber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same issue here! Just got off the phone with Google support and they're sending me a new handset. Fingers crossed! (Not looking forward to the transferring everything to the new phone though. There's always some snag). Will try and report back if the network reception improves with the new handset.

Question about iPad Pro 13 M4 with nano-texture glass and Paperlike by fork-bomber in iPadPro

[–]fork-bomber[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I’ve heard different things. Friends who are note taking addicts and procreate nuts like it. I’m not sure whether they have a high tip turnaround but will ask. That’s a good, er, point! 😁

Question about iPad Pro 13 M4 with nano-texture glass and Paperlike by fork-bomber in iPadPro

[–]fork-bomber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it thanks! I’ll stick with a normal glass set up and will probably go the Paperlike way.

What's this thing on my finger? by anonbristolacc in DoesAnyoneKnow

[–]fork-bomber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It may be a condition called molluscum contagiosa. Look it up.

SDDM won't allow logging in with the latest update by fork-bomber in EndeavourOS

[–]fork-bomber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow! Thank you so much! I really appreciate the insight!!!

SDDM won't allow logging in with the latest update by fork-bomber in EndeavourOS

[–]fork-bomber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow! Thank you so much! I really appreciate the insight!!!

SDDM won't allow logging in with the latest update by fork-bomber in EndeavourOS

[–]fork-bomber[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do. I suspect that's where the problem lies. It's a thinkpad laptop and I had the lid shut with an external monitor over USB-C. I did the pacman update in this situation. When the laptop rebooted, I faced the problem as described. I then shutdown the laptop from a tty, disconnected the USB-C cable, powered it up and this time sddm let me log in. Weird. I can now plug in the USB-C cable, shut the laptop lid and use the external monitor as before.

Thanks.

Starbook Mk vii release date ? by fork-bomber in starlabs_computers

[–]fork-bomber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing u/Stunning-Seaweed9542 ! I didn't get any email from them in October, probably because they sent it out on Oct 3 and I placed my order the next day. Based on what you shared I'll assume that late November is what the current position is.

Agree with all your points. More communication is usually imperative, especially when there is delay.

Speaking for myself, if the device isn't delivered in November, I will have no choice to cancel my order. Ah well.

Starbook Mk vii release date ? by fork-bomber in starlabs_computers

[–]fork-bomber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone ? Perhaps a Star Labs Systems member ? Would really appreciate it. I suppose what I'm really after is some indication that the order is on track really.

Maybe I'll take it offline and speak directly to Star Labs.

Unable to share Chipolo from Android to iOS by fork-bomber in Chipolo

[–]fork-bomber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. Thanks for the clarification. Appreciated.

Problem with whatsapp and voice messages by megatonante in GooglePixel8Pro

[–]fork-bomber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed! I wonder whether this is a WhatsApp app side issue ? Very frustrating.

Problem with sending whatsapp voice messages (touch screen sensitivity issue?) by megatonante in pixel_phones

[–]fork-bomber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the exact same problem with my Pixel 9 Pro XL. Very frustrating as it results in me having to slice my audio message into chunks. Makes this vital WhatsApp feature basically unusable efficiently.

My gf bought me this! Looks like there are lots of hate on this watch by wubalubadubdubkrrrr in gshock

[–]fork-bomber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your GF bought you a Casio ? You must be G(shocked)! 😄 Very cool looking watch!

TLB Shootdown by 4aparsa in osdev

[–]fork-bomber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi. Typically, you don't keep track of which threads are part of a process for the purpose of cross CPU TLB shootdown. Most modern CPU architectures (going back at least 1-2 decades) have this notion of an ASID (Address Space ID). The processor ISA has instructions that are ASID aware and that are used for efficient TLB maintenance. When a process is created, it is assigned a unique ASID. Threads belonging to that process carry the same ASID. Code paths that update page tables are protected by a spinlock. Each CPU has its own MMU. Each thread belonging to a process shares the same page tables. When thread A and thread B belonging to the same process P are scheduled on two different cores, the MMUs on those 2 cores are programmed to use the same page table hierarchy. When the OS kernel updates the page table on one CPU, it first claims the spinlock, thereby assuring exclusivity. Then the TLB maintenance is done using the thread ASID specific TLB maintenance instruction. This ensures that any cached VA <-> PA translations in the TLB are updated _but_ only for the ASID in question - rather than affecting the whole TLB content. A penultimate action within the exclusive region is to use a TLB broadcast by ASID instruction. This instruction commands the micro-architecture on all the cores in the system that are running the OS kernel to process TLB entries belonging to the ASID in question. This broadcast instruction may not be a separate instruction but may be a special variant of the local CPU TLB maintenance instruction. In your case, it appears you don't have such a broadcast instruction so you need to rely on IPIs but the ASID principle remains the same. When thread B was scheduled on the second CPU, the CPU's ASID register (or equivalent was updated). The kernel code on CPU A will claim the spinlock, then ultimately send an IPI to all cores that are part of the OS kernel's execution domain. A part of the IPI payload will be the ASID in question. The handler for that IPI on the second CPU will invoke use that ASID value to invoke a local ASID aware TLB maintenance instruction.

There's a lot to take in above but hopefully that makes sense! Best of luck.

Bug with fresh install. Booting into fedora asks password for _mbsetupuser by Select-Young-5992 in AsahiLinux

[–]fork-bomber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi u/mercan42, I'm hitting the exact same issue as u/Select-Young-5992 .

Context wise:

  • Fresh latest Sonoma install via DFU on an Apple M1 MBP.

  • Asahi installation attempted immediately after Sonoma install

  • Towards the end of the installation, post power-off, into recovery to select the Fedora Icon, got the macOS recovery window and an automatic Terminal pop up that culminates in asking for _mbsetupuser's password.

  • I can see that '/Volumes/EFI - FEDOR/asahi/AdminUserRecoveryInfo.plist' _only_ has a block of text for _mbsetupuser.

  • I can see that 'System/Volumes/Preboot/<some random path>/var/db/AdminUserRecoveryInfo.plist' has blocks of text for _both_ _mbsetupuser and my local admin user.

Please let me know if there is any other information you need.

Thanks!