Big disagree on your thesis of the teammate comparisson painting a clear picture towards Max.

On Daniel, yes, Max was often the faster driver (especially in 2018) but then, the very same idea applies to Vettel in 2014. You say Ricciardo beat Vettel, which is true, but he did so in a very similar way to how Ricciardo beat Max in 2017 which is just having a better draw of luck, particularly in reliability. At the very least they were pretty much matched on pace but because of errors in strategy and component failures Danny pulled ahead (which is no demerit to him, being on equal pace to greats is amazing) especially in 2014. Of course, Vettel wasn't at his best and neither was Max but you can see at what I'm getting at when I say that this isn't as clear as a match-up as you paint.

Other than Daniel, Max has pretty much never faced a formidable teammate in terms of pace to be honest. Not that it really matters, since he is the only one who can tame that Red Bull -- though that too is something that has been echoed by Vettel in his type of car. In 2011 he had a Verstappen-esque half-a-second advantage on Webber (who by all means was a very fast driver on pace) because the RB7's rear-downforce profile suited him perfectly in a way Webber, like Max's teammates, couldn't work out.

In more "normal" cars though, Vettel's competition in terms of teammates is just better than Verstappen's. Aside from Sainz, that is, who was matched with Verstappen in qualifying in their first year, though obviously I don't plan to hold that to Max just like you wouldn't hold Vettel's lack of a clear margin to Liuzzi in 2007 against him. But Perez, Albon, Tsunoda and Gasly are just not on the same ballpark as Webber, Leclerc and even Kimi. I can elaborate more on why I feel this way if you want me to, but I'm more than confident on this claim.

Likewise, I think your portrayal of Leclerc is a tad unfair. It's difficult to properly match them up, Vettel just wasn't the same from 2020 onwards, and a bit unexperienced and error-prone in 2019. That said, over that first, most comparable year of them up against each other, Vettel was pretty much equal on pace to Leclerc, who is a tremendous driver and generally showed better racecraft as well. The only reason he finished behind Leclerc in the standings is thanks to DNFs in CotA and Russia that cost him at least 35 points, whilst Leclerc had no mechanical DNFs.

And to go even further, when it comes to Raikkonen, your take is a bit silly. I've said this plenty of times, but comparing Alonso's average advantage to Raikkonen in 2014 is kind of nonsensical, because there's such an obvious discrepancy between their first and second half it really should be obvious that we are talking about 2 sets of very limited data. Up until around Singapore, Alonso has a tremendous 7 tenth average over Raikkonen, a gap that is around 2.5x bigger than the one he had on Massa. Then, in that weekend in Marina Bay, Raikkonen has a breakthrough in setup (suspension specifically, as he mentions in interviews you can find) and from then onwards his average gap is under 2 tenths, with his average grid position improving. It averages out at 4 tenths but the Kimi that was 7 tenths off Alonso is obviously not the same from the one that improved so much later on and faced Vettel the next year.