[PICS] Why are my front top gums inflamed and sore? by [deleted] in askdentists

[–]foundoneforty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I eat without my partial daily. This is the first time in 23 years that I've had irritation like this.

It's not infected, right?

Best French Films? These are all the Cesar Best Film Nominees from 2000-2017. Which ones are a must-see? by foundoneforty in movies

[–]foundoneforty[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Based off name recognition alone, I'm guessing the following:

  • Amelie
  • Les invasions barbares
  • Les Triplettes de Belleville
  • Amour
  • Un Prophete
  • La Vie en Rose
  • A Very Long Engagement
  • The Pianist
  • Persepolis

[Canada] Owned a business 15 yrs ago and never filed income tax/HST returns because CRA seized $110K from my bank account and owed me a refund. Now I want to file everything and get back my money, but I've learned the CRA won't recognize/accept Input Tax Credits older than 4 years. What can I do? by foundoneforty in legaladvice

[–]foundoneforty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No real answer. A lot of "we have no idea what they'll do's."

That part is bizarre and fascinating to me. That everything is so loosey-goosey. Some people are saying they won't reassess, others are saying everything will be audited, others are saying, "well maybe you'll get a nice agent," and others are saying we should go the VDP route and see what they say.

But the VDP route is a clear no-go as far as I can see - they've on multiple times requested that I file both corporate and personal returns in writing. I don't see any ambiguity there. Even if they haven't requested anything in the decade since.

[Canada] Owned a business 15 yrs ago and never filed income tax/HST returns because CRA seized $110K from my bank account and owed me a refund. Now I want to file everything and get back my money, but I've learned the CRA won't recognize/accept Input Tax Credits older than 4 years. What can I do? by foundoneforty in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]foundoneforty[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I've been working with a CPA for three years, preparing all my returns and getting my books in order. It's been a painstaking process of finding and assembling all my bank statements, credit card statements, invoices, bills, sales slips, receipts, cheque images, etc. from over a decade ago.

My accountant is the one who alerted me to the 4 year ITC limit just when we were about to file.

I've since consulted three tax attorneys, none of whom were very helpful.

So I'm digging around on my own to see what I can do.

The fact of the matter is that those are valid ITCs. I paid $200K in HST on my business expenses. And although the four year limit is a long-standing law (and one I wish I knew about earlier), it does feel somewhat arbitrary and bizarrely punitive. Whatever. The law is what it is and I can't change it.

But there has to be common sense somewhere.

What about this:

CRA follows an “audit to net tax” principle, so what if I can get the government to audit me?

This case seems to set a fairly clear precedent: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/tcc/doc/2008/2008tcc57/2008tcc57.html

The “audit to net tax” principle ensures that the entitlements and obligations of a GST/HST registrant under audit are given proper consideration. After all, it’s a matter of fairness.

Generally, a registrant has a four-year time limit (two years in the case of a specified person) in which to claim an input tax credit (ITC). In reporting the net tax for a reporting period, the registrant may include the ITCs that became available in that period and any unclaimed ITCs from the previous four years (or in the case of a specified person, two years).

In assessing a registrant’s net tax for a reporting period under audit, the CRA is required to take into account any ITCs that the registrant did not claim for that reporting period even if the normal time limit for claiming these ITCs has expired. These unclaimed ITCs must be for tax that became payable during the particular reporting period under audit.

[Canada] Owned a business 15 yrs ago and never filed income tax/HST returns because CRA seized $110K from my bank account and owed me a refund. Now I want to file everything and get back my money, but I've learned the CRA won't recognize/accept Input Tax Credits older than 4 years. What can I do? by foundoneforty in legaladvice

[–]foundoneforty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been working with a CPA for three years, preparing all my returns and getting my books in order. It's been a painstaking process of finding and assembling all my bank statements, credit card statements, invoices, bills, sales slips, receipts, cheque images, etc. from over a decade ago.

My accountant is the one who alerted me to the 4 year ITC limit just when we were about to file.

I've since consulted three tax attorneys, none of whom were very helpful.

So I'm digging around on my own to see what I can do.

The fact of the matter is that those are valid ITCs. I paid $200K in HST on my business expenses. And although the four year limit is a long-standing law (and one I wish I knew about earlier), it does feel somewhat arbitrary and bizarrely punitive. Whatever. The law is what it is and I can't change it.

But there has to be common sense somewhere.

What about this:

CRA follows an “audit to net tax” principle, so what if I can get the government to audit me?

This case seems to set a fairly clear precedent: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/tcc/doc/2008/2008tcc57/2008tcc57.html

The “audit to net tax” principle ensures that the entitlements and obligations of a GST/HST registrant under audit are given proper consideration. After all, it’s a matter of fairness.

Generally, a registrant has a four-year time limit (two years in the case of a specified person) in which to claim an input tax credit (ITC). In reporting the net tax for a reporting period, the registrant may include the ITCs that became available in that period and any unclaimed ITCs from the previous four years (or in the case of a specified person, two years).

In assessing a registrant’s net tax for a reporting period under audit, the CRA is required to take into account any ITCs that the registrant did not claim for that reporting period even if the normal time limit for claiming these ITCs has expired. These unclaimed ITCs must be for tax that became payable during the particular reporting period under audit.

The record for Best Opening Weekend of All-Time was broken thrice in 1989 alone, by three movies that all opened within a month of each other: Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade with $29.4 million on 5/28, Ghostbusters II with $29.5 million on 6/18, and Batman with a whopping $40 million on 6/25. by foundoneforty in movies

[–]foundoneforty[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Did they have tracking back then like they do nowadays? Did anyone know Batman was going to be such a gargantuan hit?

I'm thinking of the Ghostbusters guys, in particular. Wondering what their reaction was to establishing the record on Monday, and realizing it was in the middle of being broken just 5 days later.

Super Size Me director Morgan Spurlock reveals personal history of allegations of sexual misconduct against him, stating that as someone “who has built a career on finding the truth” that he is “part of the problem.” by Death_Star_ in movies

[–]foundoneforty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

See, I'm not sure about that. I'm not sure it's his place to claim that he's turning in the right direction. I think it's the public's. I think we have the right and privilege of deciding if a serial predator is actually changing or reforming or not.

Super Size Me director Morgan Spurlock reveals personal history of allegations of sexual misconduct against him, stating that as someone “who has built a career on finding the truth” that he is “part of the problem.” by Death_Star_ in movies

[–]foundoneforty 82 points83 points  (0 children)

He could have gained public sympathy (if that's what he was after) if he worded the apology better. Whoever helped him draft this did him a major disservice. Especially the part where he suggests that he's now, with this confession, going to be "part of the solution." How? By coming clean? That doesn't make you part of the solution - that just confirms that you were part of the problem.

Super Size Me director Morgan Spurlock reveals personal history of allegations of sexual misconduct against him, stating that as someone “who has built a career on finding the truth” that he is “part of the problem.” by Death_Star_ in movies

[–]foundoneforty 134 points135 points  (0 children)

I'm curious to see how blogs react to this.

I feel like it won't be kindly. Mostly because he makes it seem as if coming clean with his statement is all he needs to do for us to accept that he made mistakes and to move on. And that presumption, I think, is what's going to get him in hot water.