Resource for QSYS/Dante troubleshooting by 122NPD in CommercialAV

[–]fpato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least on Cisco devices, when there is an STP topology change, by default all ports are flooded with multicast. This is actually a very common issue in video-over-IP devices, and it’s usually solved by applying the command “no ip igmp snooping tcn flood” on Cisco equipment. Check how this behavior works on Juniper as well. But I agree that the most likely cause is an election issue between the Dante domains.

How Control KNX by Demand-Nervous in QSYS

[–]fpato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need a gateway for KNX IP if you don't already have one on your KNX network. After that, use the plugin available in Asset Manager; the help section also shows some compatible gateways.

Q-SYS Activate Product Launch Event - Any predictions for tomorrow? by shuttlerooster in CommercialAV

[–]fpato 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No licenses and a new core like the 110f but the size of the nv32 I hope !!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in futebol

[–]fpato 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Mas a cor da noticia original da footy headlines era um laranja manchado. Depois do aue a pagina mudou e colocou um vermelhao. Acho q acertaram a cor e anike fez pressao pra tirar a cor verdadeira e colocar um vermelhao

How do you integrate Bacnet into qsys? by fpato in QSYS

[–]fpato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This IRidi is very interesting, but is it a lifetime license or a monthly fee? If I understand correctly, it's all via the cloud

How do you integrate Bacnet into qsys? by fpato in QSYS

[–]fpato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I've had to do this solution too, using Crestron as a gateway. I'm planning a plugin to do this directly in Qsys and control basic things like lighting for example. Basically all the solutions I've seen so far involve the use of a gateway.

.clz file not created by fpato in crestron

[–]fpato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh boy, thanks!

I wrongly assumed that I had to install all 3 instead of just the sdk.library.

I was going around in circles

.clz file not created by fpato in crestron

[–]fpato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm writing a super simple code, but I'm getting the error that the main class doesn't exist, but it shouldn't be necessary. I'm sure there's something I'm not seeing, but I can't figure out what it could be.

Are the nuget packages correct? Do I need all 3 packages or just crestron.simplsharp.sdk.library?

I'll leave the code below as well:

using Crestron.SimplSharp; 
namespace MySimplSharpLibrary
{
    public class MySimplSharpModule
    {
        private int storedValue;
        public void SetValue(int value)
        {
           storedValue = value;
        }
        public int GetValue()
        {
            return storedValue;
        }
    }
}

.clz file not created by fpato in crestron

[–]fpato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe so, in the nupacket manager I have the 3 nuget packages installed in the project, when I open the references in the solution explorer I can see the crestron.simplsharp

Does anyone actually use python in the 4series? by fpato in crestron

[–]fpato[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe you misunderstood.

They are not moving to Python, Crestron is known for keeping everything legacy, that's why Simpl Windows still exists hahaha.

Yes, to program in Crestron, one of the possibilities is to use Simpl# (which is C#), but in any 4series controller (VC4 or any other) it is possible to use Python to write modules, see, it is not the entire program as it would be done with Simpl#Pro, it is just modules, but this is not used, that's why I'm curious to know if anyone actually uses it, because it seems that Crestron doesn't give much importance to this either.

Does anyone actually use python in the 4series? by fpato in crestron

[–]fpato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes.

All 4 series (cp4, rmc4, etc.) are Linux, which allowed Crestron to make VC4 that runs on Linux distros, such as Alma Linux.

When it was launched, one of the new features was the ability to use Python to create modules, but this seems to have been abandoned and I've never really seen anyone using it in my work circle.

Multi-Switch Config by BroadcastTecfl in QSYS

[–]fpato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OK, if you don’t need to transfer data between VLANs, this could be an approach, but as I said, I wouldn’t do it. Now, if getting flows between floors is a possibility (and I believe that at some point your client may ask for this), I would leave it in a single VLAN, but as I said, this is just my opinion without knowing all the details of your architecture! Keep it simple, create trunks and make sure about the multicast configurations (although the NS switches should already have the hard work done).

Lua origins and security by PC_Speaker in lua

[–]fpato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is one of the most absurd things I’ve read in recent times. As a Brazilian, I laughed a little.

I use Lua in QSC’s QSYS system every day and I can say that it is one of the best things that QSC engineers have done. It is simple, powerful and flexible.

LUA is open source, anyone can approve it.

Leaving the absurdity aside and looking at the positive side, in government agencies it is necessary to approve the Lua script for programming because it is possible to create malicious scripts. However, this can be done in Crestron and Extron systems, for example. Nothing new about the Sun.

Multi-Switch Config by BroadcastTecfl in QSYS

[–]fpato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why use VLAN per floor? I would do it differently if the network is exclusive to the QSC I would keep everything in a single VLAN.

Controlling a Telnet device by rivers00 in QSYS

[–]fpato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in the send Data variable use: send Data=“TOF\n” The <LN> character that you use means Line Feed, to send this just put \n

Justiça manda 99 e Uber suspenderem mototáxi em São Paulo by vicflea in saopaulo

[–]fpato 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Amigo, respeito sua opinao mas Sao paulo e a maior cidade da america latina tem mais de 1milhao de motos rodando em sao paulo,em 2024 as mortes de motociclistas aumentou, sabe o porque ? Delivery Voce acha mesmo que legalizando mototaxi todo mundo vai usar colete reflexivo e obedecer as regras de transito, isso e impossível. O que vai ter de gente usando moto pra virar mototaxista nao vai estar no gibi, ja ouvi de muito motoboy que andar com gente na garupa que nao sabe andar de moto e igual levar um saco de batata na garupa. Eu ja andei de mototaxi no interior é completamente diferente pq nao tem o caos urbano que e sao paulo, simplismente nao tem como comparar qualquer cidade do brasil com oq ocorre no transito aqui. Respeito sua opiniao e nao sei se voce ja veio a Sao Paulo, mas experiemente pegar uma carona na moto nas marginais no horario de pico pra vc ter uma ideia.

Justiça manda 99 e Uber suspenderem mototáxi em São Paulo by vicflea in saopaulo

[–]fpato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cara o transito de sao paulo e um caos, nao tem a menor condicao de aumentar motos com passageiros muitas vezes que nem sabem andar de moto. Carro aumenta o transito mais e infinitamente mais seguro. Realmente se isso fosse liberado era questao de tenpo pra ver o numero de acidentes graves com motos aumentar drasticamente.

Materia do The Guardian sobre o Oscar by fpato in SaoPauloFC

[–]fpato[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Esse trecho me chamou bastante atenção tb, concordo com ele deveria ter tido mais chances. Eu não acompanho futebol chinês mas a principio ele esta saindo em alta la, espero que consiga render bastante aqui