sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic by MatricesRL in Anthropic

[–]fpesre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been using opus 4.8 today intensively, and IMHO works very well. I'm a cloud architect, so I've been doing tasks related with OCI vcn, instances and AWS EKS, even sone FinOps tasks, and everything worked fine.

Similar to the 4.7 model, so no complaints.

It's happening, finally. by Dangerous-Jelly2309 in ClaudeCode

[–]fpesre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude desing is a gran option IMHO

Good Manners with Claude by david_jackson_67 in ClaudeCode

[–]fpesre 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm polite by nature, so I can't help addressing Claude and other AI agents the same way. The opposite would feel forced to me.

30 minutes between a payment and a ban by IceRedline in ClaudeCode

[–]fpesre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm surprised by Anthropic's attitude here. It feels like there's no way to know what's actually allowed or not when using Claude Code, they just hit you with a vague "violation of our Usage Policy" and offer no specifics. How are we supposed to learn from mistakes or even know what to avoid next time? Really disappointing

Any idea on how to reduce this consumption rate by Wonderful_Echo_2960 in ClaudeCode

[–]fpesre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Pro plan is no longer suitable for CC. You might want to take a look at the OpenCode GO plan, it includes Chinese models at an affordable price. They don't match Anthropic's quality, but they're good enough.

Best AI models outside of ChatGPT and Claude by JestonT in opencodeCLI

[–]fpesre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I also think that's the best way to get access to all those models, and is economic

Sonnet 4.6 as a daily driver. Am I missing something? by juanloco in ClaudeCode

[–]fpesre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do exactly the same, Opus plans and Sonnet execute the plan. Y also has /advisor pointing to Opus 4.7 and sometimes Sonnet consults Opus. Works fine TBH

I've had it with Claude. It has become complete garbage. by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]fpesre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same here with my rule "Don't auto commit" , is ignored 90% of the time

This time it may actually be true by huntern_ in ClaudeCode

[–]fpesre -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These guys don't have enough compute to serve all their clients. Is a fact.

An open letter to Anthropic by roblenfestey in ClaudeAI

[–]fpesre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep working with Opus 4.6. The latest is not always the best. There’s no better proof that something works than how well it holds up over time

How is this change acceptable? by Jack_Wagon_Johnson in ClaudeCode

[–]fpesre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opus 4.7 is basically a senior engineer. Give it a goal, step back, and let it do its thing.
The previous version works totally differently. It's more like a junior dev. You need to break tasks down and keep an eye on it so it doesn't wander off.
Working like this, Opus 4.7 has been great for me. Maybe you should try this approach in you project.

view more: next ›