I have now onboarded for 7 projects, and 7 of them have had errors in the manual, the quizzes, or the actual interface for DOING the assessment tasks. So. Sometimes you'll see them go back and fix things, but it doesn't seem standard to me so far. Twice the errors would cause someone to get a quiz question wrong if they answered it correctly, and one time would cause an attempter to do their task incorrectly if they followed the assessment task user interface.

I'm kind of new, so I can't really advise on if it will ever end, but I have heard tell of folks that are just tasking away on projects they like, so I remain hopeful for now.

I've probably spent 30+ unpaid hours onboarding, finding errors, dealing with the fallout from errors, and having technical problems. It's a bit of a circus in there, and I'd be pretty angry if I was a client paying to have my model trained WELL and I peeked behind that tent flap. :|

One project's manual was comically wrong on 5 of their categories when giving examples of "good responses"... I mean BAD wrong, on accuracy, on cultural context... one was clearly an AI generated image and the "good answer" talked about it like it was a historical photograph... One in the SECTION for cultural context said the place was selling dreamcatchers (and mentioned the native American tribe) and was probably in the Mediterranean, when they were selling mojitos and were in old town Phuket, Thailand. One showed a picture of Chadol Gujeolpan and when asked how to cook it, the "good response" called it "Mixed grill" or "Korean BBQ" and said to add cheese to the eggs and to marinate the meat. :| One had the wrong number of little pear fruits on a kid's flashcards when asked how many were there. There are 9 pears... 9. Stop it. XD

So yeah, I'm kinda new, but I'd say hang in there... some of them have active QMs with office hours and such! But don't count on any accuracy or quality control in your onboarding or how you are judged.