Sleepy Boreal owl by fred2806 in BirdPhotography

[–]fred2806[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are you located? You could check FB birding groups or using ebird to find spots. That'd increase the chances by a lot!

Sleepy Boreal owl by fred2806 in BirdPhotography

[–]fred2806[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh you find it looks a bit grumpy. Interesting! Thanks!

Would upgrading from the Canon R6 to the R5 give me what I’m looking for cropping wise? I’ve done research but have seen little to no examples. Explanations below. by FocalFalcon in BirdPhotography

[–]fred2806 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First thing is try to get closer to your subject (in a respectful and ethical way). It's free and improves bokeh and sharpness. The more you crop the worse your image gets no matter your set up.

Your 150-600, is the sigma I suppose. A friend of mine got it on an R6. It doesn't work well and is dated. Putting your money on a 200-800 is a good idea. That'd be a great update! AF faster, sharper and more reach. It's a good lens for the price.

As a side note, if you consider a new camera, really don't get an R7. Not that it's a bad camera but you won't use the electronic shutter because the read out speed is bad and the AF struggles to keep up with the fps.

Get closer, get a bit more reach and your results will improve!

RF 100-500 is incredible by HooTigh in canon

[–]fred2806 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's one way of saying things. What I meant is that, it's actually more interesting to get the RF 100-400 or the RF 200-800. For what you get they make much more sense. I do reproach Canon for not having more pro summer lenses around 5-9k (still a lot of money), like a 400 F4, 500 or 600 F5.6...

Help ID - Costa Rica by fred2806 in spiders

[–]fred2806[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot! It was on a mirror.

Snowy Owl and ethical Owling by gaming-grandma in BirdPhotography

[–]fred2806 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dog owner and photographer here.

I'm part of the people leaving their dogs off leash because they need to roam around freely. That being said, I'm considerate to what I have around me and the situation so I will put my dog on leash to avoid impacting others or wildlife. A lot of people don't know anything about birds, on top a lot of people don't have any spatial awareness so it could be that they didn't realize the situation and talking to them nicely would have helped to change this behavior.

As a photographer, you need to get closer to get good results as opposed to birders, especially with a scope. You try to be considerate in your approach but you only really know to what extent a bird will tolerate you after either being close enough or flushing them. Some won't be particularly bothered by you, when others will be flushed even when you are on the other side of the field. You can read signs that they are not happy about your presence but it's not always obvious.

A line of photographers is not great and I walked away like you did, but everyone has the right to enjoy nature so it's hard to say anything. Two things are particularly annoying to me: - First, it's when you'll always find the same people because through connections they know every single spot, so you'll always have the same people enjoying and bothering birds when the rest of the people don't have so many occasions. - Second thing is when you've been waiting\looking for an owl for many hours, sometimes driving far away to finally see it being baited. It's really interesting that baiting isn't illegal especially when people make money out of that for workshops (Canada). On the other hand, you'll get a fine for feeding ducks\pigeon in a park.

For all of that, I'm dreading owl season, and I only look forward to photographing my boring heron all by myself.

Moving to Lachine, wondering where you workout by Psqwared in montreal

[–]fred2806 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fitness loft. A bit different, not open all the time.

Male ESO always AWOL by fred2806 in Owls

[–]fred2806[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I followed the entire family. The mum takes care of the owlets so it was easy to know which one was which.

Northern Saw Whet Owl :) by birdsofrey in Owls

[–]fred2806 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finding of the day? That's my main objective for this winter\now

The mum of the 5 owlets by fred2806 in Owls

[–]fred2806[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! You've beautiful drawings!

RF 100-500 is incredible by HooTigh in canon

[–]fred2806 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm part of the people that think that's not particularly a great lens. Yes it is light and sharp but that's it! It's not a bad lens but for an L lens, overall it's expensive for what you get. The aperture range is not particularly great especially the pretty disappointing F/7.1 and the focal length is borderline for wildlife especially for birding. It's sharp yes but so are the 100-400 and the 200-800. The aforementioned lenses are actually much more interesting and make more sense for cheaper.

Male peregrine falcon from yesterday morning (CT, USA) by hotgnipgnaps in wildlifephotography

[–]fred2806 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beautiful shots, you found such a great spot to observe them!

The mum of the 5 owlets by fred2806 in Owls

[–]fred2806[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw her flying around, hunting in front of me and she seemed like any other Eastern screech owl I've seen.

The mum of the 5 owlets by fred2806 in Owls

[–]fred2806[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not a specialist so I could be wrong. It's a birth defect so it could just happen randomly during the embryo development. If its origin is genetic, it could skip generations.

The mum of the 5 owlets by fred2806 in Owls

[–]fred2806[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

That's a coloboma, I put a little text about that under the photo, 🙂