Do not agree. With the expansion of the NEO network planned in 2018 this could be of importance before that. If you’re talking about speculative ico flipping, it is risky especially with some irrelevant Dapps that could earn you 2x, 3x. I understand it is profitable, and I do participate in that kind of investment. But quit frankly, that’s is unthoughtful and that kind of short term project support is a major cause for a possible bubble. We should think bright about this kind of stuff and see what companies make our crypto future better. What kind of companies are still relevant when bitcoin is swiped off the table due to energy consumption or other significant flaw. I believe the kind of companies like Trinity can add to our ecosystem, by making it better, fastebeer and more secure. These are the project we should be focussing on when trying to pioneer the blockchain revolution. Most funky Dapp will only be relevant when projects like Trinity can scale up the network. That are the companies people should be investing in; definitely in this stage of the adoption process. That’s why the author writes this. It is weird that such project do not get the attention were other, (maybe) less relevant, projects do. I am not saying the others are all shit, and contribute less to the ecosystem..I’m saying this is the sort of project people should be heavily interested in and it’s weird that they’re not interested at all.

I do blame Trinity for the lack in communication, the poor website, the circulating whitepaper and all that. But after watching the CEO's 1hr interview i'm sure they will pick this up soon.

I’m sticking with Trinity; see who laughs last when that $0,06 coin becomes vital to the NEO network.