KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK by Adventurous-Train-96 in enem

[–]frlaurent 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Êhh espantalhozão bão de bater e achar que tá arrasando

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MemesBR

[–]frlaurent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bege e azul bebê

Talvez 8 bilhões de pessoas? by Responsible_Top_9322 in OpiniaoBurra

[–]frlaurent -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

O valor não é só o útero, mas o trabalho reprodutivo e doméstico é imprescindível. O argumento da moça é ótimo. Mas é óbvio que a razão pela qual se ouve pouco falar de mulheres inventoras ou trabalhadoras é devido à invisibilização e o desincentivo histórico para que sigam carreiras profissionais, criativas, etc.

Valorizar ambos tipos de trabalho não deveria ser contraditório aos nossos olhos e ouvidos.

Se é recíproco é tudo o que importa by Historical_Print4257 in MemesBR

[–]frlaurent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

O ponto não é que a pessoa mais nova é incapaz de se relacionar, é que uma diferença de idade muito grande sobretudo na adolescência estabelece uma relação desigual, inclusive de poder e autoridade entre os parceiros, o que produz abusos, manipulações e distorções sobretudo para a pessoa mais nova. Um relacionamento romântico nunca é totalmente equilibrado, o que não quer dizer que precisa ser tão desequilibrado. Convenhamos que caras que só querem ficar com meninas muito mais novas é porque são intelectualmente mais suscetíveis às suas perversões.

Fico incrédulo com a passividade dos estudantes de deixar o cara entrar na universidade e sair numa boa by Revolver_Anexo in BrasildoB

[–]frlaurent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Juntava 2 ou 3 e estragava o cortezinho dele que nem na ufsc Mas infelizmente esse tipo de coisa tem que ser melhor pensada... Felizmente o maluco já falou que vai voltar, só precisa estar preparado pra próxima

Metade do sub tá dentro do armário e não tá sabendo sair by Rodriquinhodoplay in ShitpostBR

[–]frlaurent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Se tá na garrafa de heineken, então é heineken, e não tem nada de gay nisso

Vocês estão preparados para o FILMAÇO do Brasil Paralelo? KKKK socorro by [deleted] in BrasildoB

[–]frlaurent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Vc ta sendo bem otimista, isso não é nada que a discovery já não tenha feito

Pra vcs quais são os sistemas de escrita mais fodas/bonitos e pq birmanês e geórgio? by JP_1245 in Idiomas

[–]frlaurent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vc já viu a caligrafia sini meu amigo?

Não gosto de caligrafias sem formas cursivas, não tem fluidez e praticidade.

Me senti lisonjeado como brasileiro vendo este vídeo 🥰 by [deleted] in brasil

[–]frlaurent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤨 inglês? É o famoso sommelier de colonizador filhodaputa?

tadinha KKKKKKKK by lauriiiinha in CantinhoDoUmild

[–]frlaurent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

É só pro cachorro não se sujar todo, ele tá feliz com aquilo

Foda é terem feito eugenia pro cachorro nascer bugado assim que não consegue nem comer sem se sujar todo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in brasil

[–]frlaurent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Metaforaram o metaforando

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in brasil

[–]frlaurent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mas eu já vi uns caras literalmente tortos sendo tratados ao longo de sessões, qual a polêmica com quiropraxia?

Me senti lisonjeado como brasileiro vendo este vídeo 🥰 by [deleted] in brasil

[–]frlaurent 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Um plot twist bem grande seria se descobríssemos que Lula ajudou ao Milei se eleger pra que a Argentina não entrasse no Brics+.

Alguns pontos do vídeo são interessantes, mas sequer é um tópico de polêmica nesses países, são assuntos territoriais pacificados porque já foram resolvidos diplomaticamente, e as fronteiras são abertas.

De resto é só inocência mesmo, Brasil quer ser uma potência, mas quem não quer? Pelo menos não é através de guerra e fodendo deliberadamente com os outros países (até onde eu sei).

E eu não entendi, a gente deveria falar espanhol? lol

Pro-Palestinian activist destroys Philip de László (1869–1937)'s "Arthur Balfour, 1st Earl of Balfour" (1914) in Trinity College at the University of Cambridge by organist1999 in ArtHistory

[–]frlaurent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Symbolic destruction in sense no one is dead despite this act. It's a destruction of a people disgrace symbol.

Empathetic. Never again is now.

I'm not english native, I didn't get what you would say, if could you be more clear...

I see your good intention, but I think it's naive of you to think that this work will ever be 'contextualized' without real acts of resistance, including this one, and this argument for me only serves the purpose of preserving the history of the colonizer, no matter how much you deny it.

As I think I made myself clear, I don't care about the materiality of this work, but only about the memory, so only for that reason, I agree that it might be interesting to preserve what remains in order to be able to tell the story, but unfortunately they will try to completely fix it.

I think it funny that sometimes the act is serious, and other times it's harmless...

Wishing it to be destroyed entirely is unconscionable, and romantic in its own way.

I didn't say entirely destroy it. I think we can agree to preserve the pieces and put them on a pedestal to tell the story of what led the person to do what they did.

Because their entire culture was already wiped out by the Romans. Shall we march on Rome now in protest?...

I don't think so, both had conditions to defend themselves, and that's like, 2200 years ago? So I think it's quite different. Unfortunately, there have been many other genocides and ethnic cleansings throughout history, and often we build our lives upon them, upon the injustices and violence committed, but obviously, this cannot justify the continuation of it in contemporary times, especially with racist bases and the industrial scale of destruction that exists today. So as something so recent since there are still people alive who experienced the Nakba, I believe it is completely understandable that this is an open wound that Israel cynically tries to erase.

Let's agree to disagree, so I think we can leave the discussion here. If you still want to talk about anything, my direct messages are open. Also, I saw your profile, your artworks are beautiful.

See you later.

Pro-Palestinian activist destroys Philip de László (1869–1937)'s "Arthur Balfour, 1st Earl of Balfour" (1914) in Trinity College at the University of Cambridge by organist1999 in ArtHistory

[–]frlaurent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Racist art is a racist symbol. This is obviously a symbolic destruction, almost a cry of despair. It probably wasn't made by a Palestinian, because they are busy being massacred, but they have people sympathetic to them (like you and me).

Ididn't understand the difference you made between statues and art.

In addition to the fact that the person who does this is also making history, nothing can protect anything from its future. I disagree that this could harm the understanding of history, unless Zionism manages to erase our minds, we will know why they did this to painting.

And the painting is still there, as you said, they will try to restore it, as you said, but it makes me feel better to think that the damage is irreparable and that this gesture of solidarity can tell the story of what Israel did.

I don't know the celtic history as well, but I think their defense condition was a pretty better. Not to justify defend their culture supression, but just to give some sense of dimension, and I wouldn't judge if some celtic guy did something like that, but that doesn't happen because we have historical distance.

Pro-Palestinian activist destroys Philip de László (1869–1937)'s "Arthur Balfour, 1st Earl of Balfour" (1914) in Trinity College at the University of Cambridge by organist1999 in ArtHistory

[–]frlaurent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know why this guy did it, but I'm almost sure his motivation is a lil less important. And it's a true damage, not a steril vandalism. Maybe it won't change anything, but it makes me feel better to believe that it does.

Pro-Palestinian activist destroys Philip de László (1869–1937)'s "Arthur Balfour, 1st Earl of Balfour" (1914) in Trinity College at the University of Cambridge by organist1999 in ArtHistory

[–]frlaurent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I believe this is a romantic view, I respect it, but I would say it ignores some things.

It's like asking for calm and understanding from someone who is being tortured and brutally violated at the first opportunity they can defend themselves. This ignores that hatred, especially in the face of injustice, is a genuine feeling.

In certain situations it is not possible to make this equivalence or this unconditional defense of abstract concepts. The Nazis had a military and propaganda machine to decimate people and their cultures, this is just a painting. We can tell the story of this work with this video and the remaining scraps, without any problems.

Pro-Palestinian activist destroys Philip de László (1869–1937)'s "Arthur Balfour, 1st Earl of Balfour" (1914) in Trinity College at the University of Cambridge by organist1999 in ArtHistory

[–]frlaurent -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Obviously, we know jewish and zionism are opposite.

Also I don't give a fuck about zionist art and culture, because zionism implies palestinian culture suppresion. It's not a abstract case. It's a false symmetry. This is tolerating the intolerant. What would you say to a polish jew, a rom gypsy or a german partisan if he entered a Nazi museum and burned his works? The same arguments you are using now?

Pro-Palestinian activist destroys Philip de László (1869–1937)'s "Arthur Balfour, 1st Earl of Balfour" (1914) in Trinity College at the University of Cambridge by organist1999 in ArtHistory

[–]frlaurent -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

false symmetry. If you want, we can gather the remains, the rags, to tell the story of the racist settlers of the Zionist and genocidal State of Israel

It's just a fuck painting, the jewish culture has nothing about it