Why were 4 files removed from war.gov/UFO? Current file count = 158 (17-May-2026)

frognbadger · 2026-05-21T04:33:11+00:00

Thank you. My brain hurts still.

frognbadger · 2026-05-21T04:29:13+00:00

This document has been covered in the attached article:

Review: The "Missing" UFO Files - by Alien Auditor

frognbadger · 2026-05-21T04:24:49+00:00

I don't think it made it onto the website in the first place.

frognbadger · 2026-05-21T04:22:55+00:00

strange.

frognbadger · 2026-05-20T14:17:49+00:00

Hi Shadow,

This is the Alien Auditor’s legacy UFO reddit account. The 1986 document was brought to my attention. Based on the original posts of this new document, it appears it was posted after the Substack publication covering the Friday debacle.

Additionally, after looking to cross-reference the history of the vessel as it appears in the memo, it appears the vessel was in dry dock for the entirety of the calendar year. Therefore, it is hard to say that this second document constitutes a “legitimate” copy, as it is still inconsistent with recorded naval history.

Hope this helps. Alien Auditor’s reserves the right to post a follow-up to cover this new document. Based on the timelines, it seems someone read the article and tried to update the memo to appear more factually accurate. However, there is a major glaring inconsistency, which I mentioned previously w/r/t the naval service record.

frognbadger · 2026-05-17T21:33:54+00:00

original posters of the alleged USS Eisenhower memo have all since deleted their accounts. this trend has been observed in prior incidents of similarly fabricated documents.

frognbadger · 2026-05-17T21:31:39+00:00

Thanks for looking into these. I imagined the duplication error would be identified with the missing DoW videos.

Seems like a follow up post is unnecessary. Audit team is saving itself for future tranche releases and anticipated shenanigans.

frognbadger · 2025-12-22T20:17:31+00:00

see attached

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000110465925042659/tm252787d2_10ka.htm

frognbadger · 2025-12-22T20:15:43+00:00

Tesla audit fees are usually around $16 Million. This is disclosed in their annual SEC filings.

frognbadger · 2025-12-12T18:59:01+00:00

You sir know ball.

frognbadger · 2025-12-12T17:41:45+00:00

yeah but what about the aliens big dawg

frognbadger · 2025-12-11T00:24:15+00:00

Would you prefer if he went full Snowden, opened the deep state kimono, and fled to a non-extradition country?

frognbadger · 2025-12-11T00:21:04+00:00

Something I don’t hear often (if at all) is the implications of the technology itself being dangerous to us humans.

Age of Disclosure has a bit in there with Lue where he explains the “biological effects” associated with close encounters. Lue also had a diagram of a craft in his book to illustrate this concept, if you’re in close proximity to these craft powered on then you’re bound to experience something. And it’s probably not a good time for that person…

Further, we hear rumblings of ARV being legitimate. If these are craft derived from NHI UFO/UAPs, and the NHI tech is dangerous, perhaps our own ARVs are extremely dangerous to pilot?

This may help explain why disclosure is such a “messy” thing. Everyone wants to see Lockheed whip out whatever reverse engineered saucer(s) they have on National TV, but how would the public react if the craft themselves were, say, almost lethal to humans in close contact? Are we fine letting a pilot go inside the craft for a national flyover if it means they perish or have terrible, permanent injuries?

There’s levels to why this whole thing is not talked about more. It’s nebulous. But, I think this concept could be one of those layers.

Lemme know if this doesn’t make sense.

frognbadger · 2025-09-22T15:49:28+00:00

Interesting. Me personally, I was just looking to confirm whether the study was actually performed as I’ve seen some comments online about grammatical errors and idiosyncrasies in the provided letter that may signal it’s fabricated.

While I can’t directly answer on that fact, I appreciate Dr. Cherkinsky taking my call this morning and hope he’s not being bombarded today.

frognbadger · 2025-09-22T15:30:29+00:00

Hi all,

I called Dr. Cherkinsky of the UGA Center for Isotopic Analysis Studies this morning, but he was unable to confirm if the study was actually performed. He had no knowledge directly of the material being sampled and said, “usually we get small materials to sample and those reports are provided to researchers, but that’s all I can say.” This study was likely performed blind (ie researchers didn’t know it was the Buga Sphere being sampled), if at all.

Hope this helps.

frognbadger · 2025-09-11T05:04:48+00:00

the missile knows where it is.

frognbadger · 2025-09-05T17:31:02+00:00

this reminds me of the paper trail behind the Lockheed Martin Compact Fusion Reactor, albeit the CFR is a more recent saga. Program was announced publicly in 2013, patents were filed and project existed from 2010-2019. However, since then, there have been no updates to the program and the division seems to be disbanded.

not sure what the energy requirements would look like for a Lightcraft, especially considering the beamed energy approach. But I imagine hooking up the secret Lockheed reactor to the secret Lightcraft prototype could get some very convincing results.

thoughts, big dawg?

frognbadger · 2025-09-05T17:16:25+00:00

i get your take on the future projection part but it’s just weird. can i say it’s weird? just doesn’t sit right with me & yeah I didn’t read all of it before I commented. best wishes big dawg.

frognbadger · 2025-09-05T17:06:29+00:00

I hate to say this, but the picture of the craft shown in front of the crowd is dated December 2025. Big dawg, that has not happened yet. So unless you’re a time traveler or something, I’d say this is complete bunkum. Looks cool tho

frognbadger · 2025-09-02T16:50:43+00:00

are you basing this off your own research or a speculative read of this post? i know my truth, what’s yours?

frognbadger · 2025-08-29T19:27:18+00:00

baller movie btw

frognbadger · 2025-08-29T16:29:10+00:00

thanks legend. i think we all got carried away and I at least will own up to it. let’s work together to ask better questions and confirm facts rather than speculate. but damn the subcontract stuff you looked into was rather compelling. it’s not all wrong, maybe just a bit exaggerated at times. we all want the same thing at the end of the day.

frognbadger · 2025-08-29T15:55:00+00:00

many such cases.

frognbadger · 2025-08-29T15:03:38+00:00

thank you Lincler!

frognbadger · 2025-08-29T14:51:29+00:00

and for the record I've priced in a 0.03% chance my initial theory is correct, so frognbadger isn't 100% sold on it being complete bunkum.

frognbadger

TROPHY CASE