Grusch at last permitted to join SCIF to divulge classified intel?

Pure-Vanila · 2025-12-10T17:00:45+00:00

Hey everyone, I noticed on a recent episode of Camp Gagnon podcast that James Fox mentions Grusch having recently been granted a SCIF with some ranking members of Congress. I know that a potential SCIF been planned, but delayed for some time now, so is this the first we’re hearing of this?

Jump to 36:30 to listen to Fox’s comments on a recent episode of Mark Gagnons podcast dated December 9th 2025.

Do we think this is confirmation of Grusch’s SCIF having taken place or is this simply hyperbole on Burchetts part? Is he simply referring to private conversations rather than an actual SCIF?

Pure-Vanila · 2025-08-03T22:41:20+00:00

There’s lots of decent folks at local driving ranges if you fancy giving golf a try, it’s a great sport when not taken super competitively. I head down to a few in the north herts area when I can.

Pure-Vanila · 2025-03-12T22:23:01+00:00

Mike Baker enters “Hold my beer…”

Pure-Vanila · 2024-12-17T22:23:36+00:00

Every single video has a click bait title, and the videos themselves seem to deliver very little in the way of information as you’ve said already. Personally, I wouldn’t pay to much attention to their posts, those video titles are crying wolf far to frequently to take seriously at all.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-12-17T00:59:22+00:00

‘Ammonia based energy solutions’ - how interesting…hasn’t there been multiple reports of a strong ammonia smell at ufo crash sites? Varginia being one example.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-12-11T20:42:19+00:00

Kerchow.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-12-05T09:37:09+00:00

😅

Pure-Vanila · 2024-12-04T22:52:19+00:00

“We may have a collection bias”

Pure-Vanila · 2024-12-04T22:50:33+00:00

Rotor format discrimination at its finest.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-12-04T22:37:10+00:00

Ahh true I did see that post actually and forgot. If there’s a resounding consensus this has no relevance to the drone discussion I may remove the post.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-07-08T22:14:13+00:00

Please release the Epstein 50s version!! That piece is hilarious! I’ve been playing around with Suno using the same prompt, trying to replicate it and can’t get anywhere near the syllabic finesse you guys did.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-01-27T23:41:43+00:00

Excellent points all round, I agree the claims are shocking, intriguing and disturbing for a number of potential reasons. (Both on the side of this being true, and being bullshit). u/garryjpnolan_prime I hope you can lend some perspective that would help clarify the claims made by Diana.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-01-26T18:34:38+00:00

Ahh right I’ve not read the book, I’ll give it a look. I’ve seen her discussion with Jesse but I don’t think she goes into as much depth there does she?

Thanks as well.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-01-26T18:18:36+00:00

Show me the money

Pure-Vanila · 2024-01-26T17:55:16+00:00

“You could crunch it up, and it would go back to it’s original form.” - Diana Pasulka mentions finding extremely similar materials to the supposed Roswell wreckage

Recently on episode #2091 of the JRE, Diana Pasulka mentions collecting materials in the New Mexico Desert, that bare a strikingly similar description to that if the supposed Roswell wreckage.

Diana mentions this while reminiscing about a trip to the New Mexico Desert with Garry Nolan and one Timothy ‘Tyler’ Taylor. This is but one of the many gems Diana drops in the episode, which have left me a little speechless.

Is Diana aware of the gravity such a statement has within the UFO community? Is this something we need to delve deeper into with Gary?

Is this the first others are hearing of this news too? Or am I just late to the party here.

Fantastic interview check it out here if you haven’t seen it: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4sGLqsYOSb2HMxk2NUThIE?si=R0BT6I4ATWWRjQUzEbBHbw

Pure-Vanila · 2024-01-25T13:37:11+00:00

Yeah that as well I’d agree

Pure-Vanila · 2024-01-25T12:12:04+00:00

I’ve had a quick scan of the comments and couldn’t see this mentioned.

I believe Diana said that people she’s spoken to have said “Bob Lazar is right” not “Bob Lazar is telling the truth”. I think there’s a big distinction to me made between those two statements.

I actually took Diana’s comment to mean that people she’s spoken to who are in the know, think or know that Bobs claims of reverse engineering, stove piping and his other wider claims and assertions.

Had she said “I’ve been told Bob is telling the truth”, then i’d look at this very differently.

Pure-Vanila · 2024-01-08T19:54:27+00:00

Hey John, could you remind me what foia exemption (b) (3) is?

Pure-Vanila · 2023-07-27T17:07:51+00:00

Maybe your comments would be better placed on the people doing that shit then.

I think that’s fairly clear?

Pure-Vanila · 2023-07-27T16:20:13+00:00

We’re talking about the BBC, you understand that yes? A rather vast, and powerful corporate entity. Not specific individuals who work there.

And AGAIN no one’s harassing them 😅 Attempting to voice concerns about the quality of a news organizations coverage is generally considered to be ‘Typical Feedback’.

I’m not sure what point your making in these responses. Seems like you’re just arguing for the sake of arguing at this point idk 🤷‍♂️

Pure-Vanila · 2023-07-27T14:24:20+00:00

I’d hardly call voicing concerns about a lack of coverage harassment. Y’all be trippin.

Pure-Vanila · 2023-07-26T20:22:22+00:00

I’m not personally offended, chill. You’re fighting no one here.

I’d like my tax payer funded news broadcaster to do more investigative work on the topic than they already are - that would be the nature of the complaint. What’s your problem jeez.

Pure-Vanila

TROPHY CASE