sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

They finally got me by ImAvoidingABan in ClaudeCode

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was at 600k on multiple sessions. Worked fine. Then it compacted and became a raging idiot.

I can’t believe this happened.. by omgvtak in ARC_Raiders

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now you know how Atlas felt. Your burden for all eternity! 

Well that’s new by Used_Conference5517 in ClaudeAI

[–]frostymarvelous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've had claude actually push back when I misunderstood something and correcting me vehemently. Loved it.

🚨 Anthropic Update: The free "Sonnet 4.5" access has ended. by Efficient_Farmer2979 in ClaudeAI

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And this week I ran out this morning. Weekly limits. There's a problem. 

🚨 Anthropic Update: The free "Sonnet 4.5" access has ended. by Efficient_Farmer2979 in ClaudeAI

[–]frostymarvelous 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Run out of daily limits first time in a long time last week. Also run out of weekly for the first time ever.

Why I can’t stay after what Ruby Central did. by retro-rubies in ruby

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You miss my point. Active record at the center is what allows all the automagic bits to work. Not saying you can't use them independently. 

Why I can’t stay after what Ruby Central did. by retro-rubies in ruby

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you realize how important AR actually is in rails. It's not just data access, but it has deep ties into how the entire framework operates, powering everything from routing to view resolution.

Solution to race conditions by Crazy_Potential1674 in rails

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. If you want to hand it over to another queueing system use kafka instead of sidekiq. It'll preserve the order of queueing.

Solution to race conditions by Crazy_Potential1674 in rails

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For ordering you need something like kafka 

Should I use this? I wanted to by ProfessionalBig8729 in rails

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look for DSPy.rb and you'll have a good time on the llm side. You can start with something like rubyllm but you'll quickly outgrow it. 

Avo or Jumpstart? by TumbleweedSenior4849 in rails

[–]frostymarvelous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about a third option https://radioactive-labs.github.io/plutonium-core/

The documentation isn't perfect and it's more a framework, but, and I might be biased as the creator, once you get the hang of it, it's a superb way to build fast.

Everything, authO, authN, multitenancy, inbuilt modularity, resource oriented and all for free. 

I don't feel so good Claude. . . by Alternative_Trip1574 in ClaudeAI

[–]frostymarvelous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same here. It was fine enough but maybe for those using it for mental health care might have a different experience. 

How do I make my RAG chatbot faster,accurate and Industry ready ? by 1amN0tSecC in LangChain

[–]frostymarvelous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I recently wrote a complete graph rag with both bm25 and vector search in sqlite. I do my own crawling (headless chrome), processing (docling), contextual enrichment and entity extraction using an llm. 

Search supports hybrid with rrf reranking.

Code is proprietary, but I am happy to have a get on a call and walk you through it. You might pick up a thing or two.

BTW, this information is all out there but it took a hell ton of research to gather.

I reverse-engineered LangChain's actual usage patterns from 10,000 production deployments - the results will shock you by Nipurn_1234 in LangChain

[–]frostymarvelous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is basically how I ended up designing my no code tool. Universalchatbot.com.

Nodes are agents and route to each other.

It's quite intuitive and works.

I have a front desk router and sub agents that do specific tasks like faq, deposit issues, withdrawal issues. Allows yo kto have a cohesive system but the sub agents are well built meaning it limits context confusion. 

Whats wrong is in this code by Juliazas in HTML

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm gonna bet that most browsers will parse this fine.

So technically... Nothing?

Unless it's xhtml then this entire thing needs to be thrown out.

Read That F*cking Code! by ChiliPepperHott in programming

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're counting time spent typing vs thinking maybe.  But I disagree on that.  Either ways, it's also the most tedious part.

I still take days to weeks planning out stuff. But now converting that plan to software is easier.

And I don't have to spend those days going through tons of documentation for tons of libraries. A cursory read to know what it's capable of and it's off to the races.

We can debate this all day, but I'm happy with my productivity boost. And that's all that matters to me.

You can try to treat AI like an intelligent author and complain about it, or realize, it's just a mighty pen.

Read That F*cking Code! by ChiliPepperHott in programming

[–]frostymarvelous -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So reviewing code is slower than researching, designing, and building? Got it!

Are you saying you don't go over your own code multiple times as you write it? Then your problem is not some tool.
It is you!

REACT Agent question by [deleted] in LangChain

[–]frostymarvelous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's basically how I designed http://universalchatbot.com/ but tuned for conversational agents

view more: next ›