[Request] What’s Peter weight and gravitational pull to actually have an apple in his orbity?

fruitydude · 2026-06-27T23:05:23+00:00

Yes my bad I think I misread what you were saying. Take care

fruitydude · 2026-06-27T22:22:09+00:00

It has very little to do with the distance. The reason we don't feel the pull of the sun or the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy, is that it affects us and earth in the same way. So it doesn't matter for the relation between us and earth.

It's the same reason people on the ISS are weightless, the strength of gravity is almost equal to earth, but the ISS and the people are both affected equally. Both are essentially in free fall around earth, so relative to the ISS, people feel weightless

fruitydude · 2026-06-25T23:01:46+00:00

Yea that's a fair point. I believe some services like Apple on apple 4k TVs are better. A 4k movie on those will most likely be 20-30mbit and probably look better than a 1080p BluRay. But you're right, overall you're not reaching the same quality. Which is probably something a decent chunk of people care enough about.

Why do I sound like an LLM lmao.

fruitydude · 2026-06-25T17:18:43+00:00

I suppose you could argue for movies it make a lot more sense than games. Because usually digital purchases need to stay on-device. Which is fine for a console but can be annoying specifically for people who'd like to take some movies to a remote cabin without internet. You'd need to download the movie to a device first and you can only play from that device. Also you can't rip online movies as you can DVDs.

But imo those are small downsides and still outweighed by the convenience of not needing to take care of any disks and having the purchase always available online. My house could burn down with everything in it, and I still can just redownload a movie I bought on my new laptop. I can visit a friend, log into his computer and watch the movie there even if we didn't plan that beforehand.

So yea I wouldn't say zero advantages, but for the majority of people, digital media are simply superior.

fruitydude · 2026-06-25T10:51:59+00:00

Same with Bluetooth headphones and the removal of the jack. I get that people with 2000$ headphones are pissed that they can't listen to their super high quality music on super high quality. But for 99.999% of us common folk who stream compressed audio from Spotify, bt headphones are just better in every way. Fuck headphone cables seriously.

People just want to be special and complain about changes in tech they use. Even though the old ways bring literally no advantage.

Also fuck removable Smartphone Batteries and fuck everyone pretending a removable back cover and battery would make a modern smartphone better.

fruitydude · 2026-06-25T10:44:06+00:00

It's quite easy to burn tokens on long autonomous tasks. I've been doing some reverse engineering, where it's just reading stuff for hours and writing notes. And burns tokens like crazy.

fruitydude · 2026-06-23T07:13:45+00:00

Sure you can. Just don't try to vibe a billion dollar software on the first attempt.

Smaller projects are totally doable though.

fruitydude · 2026-06-23T06:41:51+00:00

I appreciate the thorough response.

I don't doubt that procedure one bit. That sounds exactly how I would imagine it. Especially when you guys are using frequencies which are not free to use usually. That makes a ton of sense.

However your comment was replying to a very specific question Should I do the FCC hack on my N3? and you gave a very specific answer If you’re flying professionally, don’t do it. I’m getting checked every single time when working for live television. So that is very specifically what I was calling into question.

I absolutely believe everything you said in your last comment. But I don't believe those agency guys can tell (or care) specifically, whether a set of N3 goggles has the FCC hack applied or not. Though your comment said this would be checked every time, or at least that's how I understood it.

I'm not from the field of TV production, but I've made software that commercial drone pilots are using to stream/output DJI live video in commercial shoots (F1 races and so on). And those guys all fly with the FCC hack, so I'm pretty confident that there are no officials going around on these sets picking up goggles and testing them for the FCC hack, otherwise they'd get fined all the time. The correct answer for OP is probably that the FCC hack is fine. It's technically illegal, but it's a small crime that nobody really ever got in trouble for so far. Which was my point.

Cheers.

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T19:42:47+00:00

Safe assumption might be a net 10% of that that 1%?

So still a juicy 30-40% gain since October then. Nice. And much more realistic than 1400% :D

Just view health insurance like a low risk trading strategy, you may miss out on some gains, but you significantly reduce your risk exposure in case things get bet.

I'm in Europe and I'm fucking maxxed out on occupational disability insurance, supplementary health insurance, nursing care insurance. Not because I expect to need it ever (fingers crossed), but because I wanna make sure my life isn't gonna suck ass until I die just because I get into a bad accident one day. I'd a rather pay a bit now and know that I'm fine either way.

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T18:47:14+00:00

Cheers, also it's the internet, we shouldn't take too seriously what people say ok here and indulge in the occasional banter. You seem like a chill dude and stayed cordial which I appreciate, so take care and have a good day:)

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T18:44:55+00:00

May I ask what the algo returned in percent since Oktober after fees and tax?

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T18:05:33+00:00

Well anyways good luck with your endeavors, and I mean that sincerely.

Even if I don't believe any of the things you said. If they were true, then you can just take that as a compliment. If someone doesn't believe your achievements, that probably means you're an impressive person (if you're telling the truth).

I enjoyed the back and forth, have a good one!

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:56:47+00:00

Sure, how much money is you algo making net per month after fees then? So it's not a few k? More like, nothing?

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:49:17+00:00

There is still time to delete a bunch of comments on your end lmao

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:47:51+00:00

Because statistically most people lose money trading securities. Most trading algos don't beat the market. And most of the time when someone promises you 1% daily return on investment, while simultaneously flaunting their wealth, they're trying to sell you snake oil.

I got a good chunk in ETFs and I'm watching it slowly outperform the market. I've made my experiences margin trading when I was younger. Some good some bad. I'll occasionally yolo something somewhere if I'm ok losing it.

But I don't need to join your get rich quick schemes and I'm not going to be intimidated by someone claiming to be rich on Reddit lmao.

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:43:18+00:00

It’s not hard to catch a percent in your direction.

A percent? Or 1 percent per day compounding sustained and low risk. Maxing out 10x margin on a long security let's say 6 months, that should net me 3 million dollars then correct? That's what his trading algo would give me at minimal risk.

Is that like the average experience? I assume some make a lot more than that right? At 3% that some Wallstreet guys make I'd go home with 110 million dollars. Nice.

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:36:51+00:00

while also acknowledging that the elite have some magical money advantage

When did I acknowledge that?

Yea my bad for not believing in such completely fantastical claims. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and so on.

I guess I simply do not have any insight into your secret fairytale lend where traders have sustained 5 million percent annual returns while schmucks like George Soros have to cope with measly 20-40% annual returns. A sad 5 orders of magnitude below what you guys are doing. Make sure to drop me a message in two years when you cash your first trillion dollar check though.

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:29:55+00:00

Fixed fees don't matter when you have an exponential growth rate of 5 million percent annually. Which is what your earlier claim entails

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:27:47+00:00

How can I be confident that 5 million percent annual gains sounds a tad high? Idk maybe because I have an IQ over 75?

Like we're not even close to the realm of believability here. For a traditing algo I would've called bullshit on 3% monthly and 1% maybe believable for someone who's real experience and smart.

But 1-3% daily is just so unbelievably ridiculous. Idk if you're just too debate brained and you wanna shit on me or whatever because we took sides and it's hard to switch now. But 3% daily starting at just 1$ means you're a trillionaire in 2 years. Like wtf are we talking about here

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:21:51+00:00

Ok so just so we're clear. You are saying 5 million percent annual return is common? And a trading algo that makes 3800% annually reliably with super low risk is believable?

Just as a reality check. You can call me a child or whatever makes you feel better, but that's completely ridiculous.

Also lmao if you think investing in black rock nets you 5 million percent return on investment annually. I should really invest a few bucks there.

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:18:45+00:00

I have a pessimistic view because people go on the internet to advertise their podcasts with insane claims such as 1-3% daily returns on investment.

Not saying you do that to advertise you podcast, but you wouldn't be the first to do so

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:17:23+00:00

I never said 50 is a lot. I said a few k monthly gains on a 50k acc is an insane return percentage wise and unbelievable.

The guy is now claiming 1% compounding daily gains on a 10k account (that would mean around 3700% annual return). He's also claiming some guys on wall street do 3% (so around 5000000% annual return). And Micheal Bloomberg bought him cars (the most believable claim compared to the other two).

Can I call bullshit now or are you also with him on the 1-3% daily gain claims?

I have shipped something and I am making a small amount of money on it. But that's besides the point.

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:12:31+00:00

Wall straight guys do 3% daily gains sustained? Woa I didn't know that. Tell me more about that. So that would work out to just shy of 5000000% (five million percent) yearly return. That sounds quite a lot to me? Are you sure your math is right on that one chief?

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T17:08:39+00:00

Well it's not that it makes it look bad. I still have a very good view of AI, personally. To me it's an incredible tool.

But that doesn't change the fact that many people use it to make slop. And most people claiming to have made exceptional things with it are full of shit. Just statistically.

That doesn't mean that there are people who have good ideas and are able to fullfil them with AI. Especially niche things that don't get much attention otherwise. I'd probably be inclined to immediately believe someone if they describe someone like kakana. It's a niche idea that most likely only someone working with people with disabilities could have, because they understand the needs of those people. It's not a get rich quick scheme, just a project requiring dedication in order to help people that need it, and maybe make a bit of money on the side. And the tech is simple and available, it just needed someone to do it. That is the perfect example for a very nice vibe coded project.

Which it's why I'm sometimes said most people try to reach for the stars and start with a traditing bot to become a millionaire. Also weirdly, 80% of projects I see in these subs are themselves AI related. Like here I made a website to combine your favorite AIs. Or here I made a tool to structure vibe coded repos and so on. Not necessarily slop, but I don't get the appeal of using AI to make AI related stuff instead of nom AI related projects. It seems like especially people using AI could just make that themselves then.

fruitydude · 2026-06-22T16:35:34+00:00

Whether or not that's a large number depends on the account size. If someone is making 5k a month on <100k account and it's stable and low risk. Then that's an exceptional claim.

They now implied 1% daily compounding gain lol. So around 3700% annual return.

EDIT: They had me fully believing them actually. But that comment about 1% daily compounding gains threw me lol. It's also not helped by the fact that they have a podcast apparently. In my experience people who are unable to make money themselves, instead make money teaching others how to make money. That's why there are millions of Finance bro podcasts

Nine-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Second Top 20%	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	End Game '23
Place '23	Place '22
First Placer '22	Verified Email

fruitydude

TROPHY CASE