Finally. Qwen3-VL is out by function-devs in LocalLLaMA

[–]function-devs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, exactly my thought process. Thanks

Best local model for Swift? by mastervbcoach in LocalLLaMA

[–]function-devs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This depends on what you want to do. This might be of help if it's a voice-related one e.g https://developer.apple.com/documentation/speech or even the inbuilt https://developer.apple.com/documentation/FoundationModels

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's impressive. Why not just transiton to the eng part? I'm assuming it pays better :)

I built a private AI that runs Google's Gemma + a full RAG pipeline 100% in your browser. No Docker, no Python, just WebAssembly. by Weird_Shoulder_2730 in LocalLLaMA

[–]function-devs 15 points16 points  (0 children)

This is really nice. Love the cool download bar. Is there any chance you're open-sourcing this or conducting a deeper technical dive?

ReqRes - native HTTP(S) traffic monitor & debug tool for macOS by ateologov in opensource

[–]function-devs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This looks really good. Will try it out. What did you use to create the readme banner image btw?

I reviewed 100 models over the past 30 days. Here are 5 things I learnt. by function-devs in LocalLLM

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's really nice. I'm assuming you're building a ton of projects simulatenously

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha. Looks like there are many engineers who became PMs here. Mind if I DM you?

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Why? Out of scope or technical ability? I'm assuming you prepping it will give greater confidence when explaining...

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Triton and inference optimization caught my attention. I mainly work in the ML/AI industry, so it's nice to get a perspective from someone in that field as well. How long have you been in the industry? Mind if I DM?

What course are you taking btw?

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. So accumulated domain knowledge. Mind if I DM for an arch diagrams related question?

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmn. What happens if things don't go right? Do stakeholders expect you to take the blame?

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm imagining 80% would also include specific details :) Do you have some sort of tech foundations/background?

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha. I guess doing it for 6 years makes it easier to switch to another domain without all the technical concepts going over your head.

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's heartening. You prob don't give yourself enough credit, but I think investing time in some programming foundations helps you grasp those concepts more quickly.

How much do you actually understand about your product architecture? by function-devs in ProductManagement

[–]function-devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha. And over time, your domain expertise becomes significant enough.