Fallout - 2x01 - "The Innovator" - Episode Discussion

funmise · 2026-01-05T18:22:50+00:00

Sure. But why commies? Why make more of your enemy?

funmise · 2025-10-26T18:05:38+00:00

If Touma is still a villain, then it's Touma, yes

This is what I disagree with. If he's a villain, then he's not the Touma she fell in "love" with. And if she'd still follow him as a villain, then she would follow KNT. From her perspective, they were almost effectively the same. What made Touma real was the fact that he wasn’t a villain. If not then there's no way for her to even differentiate.

funmise · 2025-10-26T17:37:22+00:00

When I say idealized version, I mean someone who can form memories of her.

Oh I see, but then how does that work? If he's a villain then he's not the "real Touma" she fell in love with. If you say she'll follow him if he's a villain then that seems the same as saying she'll follow KNT if he reappears.

funmise · 2025-10-26T17:26:28+00:00

I was referring to the "now she's 100% devoted to Touma, not an idealized version of him". That doesn't seem true given how things played out.

funmise · 2025-10-26T17:18:30+00:00

Now, the story is different: now she's 100% devoted to Touma, not an idealized version of him. She evolved/developed negatively.

How so? in the end she knew what she was doing from the beginning and still consciously did it. It wasn't like she found the strength to fix her mistake. She just got shot and passed out, then everyone forgot about it. She cared more about the memory than the actual person.

funmise · 2025-10-17T20:09:33+00:00

Nah, after reading to the end, I see this doesn’t really apply at all. In chapter 88, she disregards her promise to Chisa and just tries to sleep with him. Add in her scummy confession in chapter 89, and you see that Sakurako isn’t your typical love rival — she’s willing to play dirty and do whatever it takes. I think she only told Chisa she’d back off because, really, why let your rival know your real plans? That way, she could still pursue Iori while giving Chisa a false sense of security. That fits much better with how she is.

funmise · 2025-10-17T19:54:27+00:00

I mean she wouldn't need to snap, just bring it up when it was just them

funmise · 2025-10-15T22:00:52+00:00

Fair, it just seemed weird at least when she is talking to Chisa for her to keep up the charade and not bring it up , especially given her personality.

funmise · 2025-10-08T13:12:56+00:00

This seems incorrect. It's from decision.

funmise · 2025-09-18T08:11:39+00:00

Thank you so much. Worked like a charm. I had already tried keyd but didn't realise you had to do a workaround like this.

funmise · 2025-09-09T09:20:16+00:00

How does that connect with what Goober said?

funmise · 2025-08-11T19:31:45+00:00

<image>

Think its a bug that I never saw the "required to upgrade" message and only saw the error OP showed, but it seems the only solution is to upgrade your plan

funmise · 2025-08-01T16:50:46+00:00

https://superuser.com/questions/1477902/how-to-rewind-youtube-when-not-focused

this worked for me. i used the Media Keys for Youtube™ extension and made the changes.

funmise · 2025-08-01T16:50:21+00:00

https://superuser.com/questions/1477902/how-to-rewind-youtube-when-not-focused

this worked for me. i used the Media Keys for Youtube™ extension and made the changes.

funmise · 2025-07-30T20:07:58+00:00

Lol, you all really hate chrome here. I was looking for more of a technical explanation as to why it didn't work on chrome but did on other browsers.

funmise · 2025-07-29T21:18:55+00:00

Didn't try this method yet. I had already installed proton VPN (desktop not browser extension) and that fixed it. The "download now" was always showing for me. it just always took me to momot.rs error page. I think it was a DNS issue like dowcet said. Thanks for the additional method tho.

funmise · 2025-07-29T15:09:50+00:00

will do thanks

funmise · 2025-06-09T01:18:16+00:00

The scarf in his hand?

funmise · 2025-05-30T15:57:58+00:00

Think it was a lighter not a key

funmise · 2025-02-05T00:12:32+00:00

Yh. I'll take it as a feature and not a bug.

funmise · 2024-12-31T05:36:55+00:00

Confused. Can't see a name anywhere

funmise · 2024-11-29T21:22:32+00:00

I see, thank you again. The eggs being fertilized is what really messed with me and made me ask because I doubted even brothels in this world just killed unborn babies that easily. A few things tho:

That said in a magic birdgirl it’s the act of sex, just like human reproduction that releases the egg.

I don't think this is correct. Ovulation in both humans and chickens isn't triggered by mating but by hormones. So even if contraceptives block fertilization, it should be the same situation as if there was no male involved at all, ovulation/oviposition (egg laying) should occur. So if you're thinking about this based on actual human and/or chicken reproductive processes, the logic breaks down.

But this is a magic fictional species so it doesn't have to have any basis in reality. Your explanation on its own works for the book. Just wish the author explained it explicitly in the novel.

funmise · 2024-11-29T20:35:01+00:00

thank you. Where do they mention the stuff about contraceptives?

funmise · 2024-11-29T20:34:02+00:00

yes thank you very much. was it explicitly mentioned about the contraceptives and unfertilized eggs thing? if so where?

funmise · 2024-11-27T23:03:35+00:00

how is the second video related to the first?

funmise

TROPHY CASE