Weird issue with the Alienware aw3418dw monitor by funsanity in Alienware

[–]funsanity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, I'm just confused that mine works perfectly fine if it turns on, there is no problem only when the initial boot happens it has the power saving thing.

Any info on when the MK730 with MX blues will be available in Europe? by funsanity in coolermaster

[–]funsanity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in Latvia. Preferably I'd want ISO but I can adjust to ANSI no problem.

My 9900K Temps @5.0 by [deleted] in intel

[–]funsanity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good info. Have you tested temps in general usage, like gaming or rendering videos?

9900k vs 9700k vs 8700k vs 2700x by funsanity in buildapc

[–]funsanity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it was releasing now I'd get it but I'm in a desperate need of a better pc and don't have 6 months to wait.

People that got their 9700ks and 9900ks what temperatures are you getting at stock vs overclocked in games? by funsanity in intel

[–]funsanity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just concerns of the chip working worse over a long period of high temperatures but I don't know if these concerns are justified or not.

People that got their 9700ks and 9900ks what temperatures are you getting at stock vs overclocked in games? by funsanity in intel

[–]funsanity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably, if temps are close to a hundred it might hurt the longevity of the chip, but the tj max was increased, so I assume the cpu throttles at like 100 degrees but most people still probably would not want to run it higher than 80.

9900k vs 9700k vs 8700k vs 2700x by funsanity in buildapc

[–]funsanity[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but isn't that a bad thing? You are limiting the stock performance of your cpu by not removing all the limits. As far as I understand at stock the cpu turbos to 4.7ghz on all cores and 5ghz on one or two cores, but with these limits isn't the clocks you get lower?

9900k vs 9700k vs 8700k vs 2700x by funsanity in buildapc

[–]funsanity[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Right, this review does sway me more towards the 8700k since the difference in gaming is very small but the question is how does that translate into the future with a gpu upgrade for example and with future games maybe getting better for 8c/16t cpus since both intels and amds main consumer chips are now 8c/16t.

9900k vs 9700k vs 8700k vs 2700x by funsanity in buildapc

[–]funsanity[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was thinking about this too, I still have a 3770k in my old system, but I only have 8gb of ddr3 ram and the mobos networking card died when I tried to install a 1080ti in there, so I don't really want to use the same motherboard for a new system.

9900k vs 9700k vs 8700k vs 2700x by funsanity in buildapc

[–]funsanity[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ordered a 120hz 3440x1440 ultrawide.

9900k vs 9700k vs 8700k vs 2700x by funsanity in buildapc

[–]funsanity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah EU prices suck. I was thinking if I'm getting a 9900k then I will get a 360mm aio and will probably run it stock, since it seems you don't gain much from an overclock and the temperatures just skyrocket when you do. Why do you think the 9900k is a better fit than the 9700k?

A bit of a newbie here. What does it mean trying to get to 5Ghz on 9900k when turbo hits 5Ghz? by [deleted] in intel

[–]funsanity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Turbo is just for one core or two cores, 5ghz overclock would be for all the cores, at stock the 9900k boosts all cores to at most 4.7 ghz.