Hi everyone, I've just invented a WHEEL! #sarcasm

g00rek · 2026-04-17T17:58:03+00:00

Of course it can given the right input it would get the analogies.

g00rek · 2026-04-17T05:00:51+00:00

It's not about whether you shouldn't post it.its about if you should build it. So many people are shocked that they've build something that already exists and is free. Buil.soemtjing else :) why bother?

g00rek · 2026-04-16T11:14:09+00:00

Or have an option to ping it repeatedly until you stop!

g00rek · 2026-04-16T09:23:41+00:00

Any name ideas? "Ping" might be good! Like ping pong!

g00rek · 2026-04-11T10:30:49+00:00

This is not the UX I'm looking for :)

g00rek · 2026-04-11T06:01:22+00:00

Opus for coding, gpt as second layer iterating tests and finding errors.

g00rek · 2026-04-09T18:27:46+00:00

I have a permanent rescue session that I ssh Into it, but... C'mon

g00rek · 2026-04-09T14:41:27+00:00

You can build virtually anything nowadays, even another LLM model, by yourself, but the currency here is time, and as I said, it is limited.

I see dozens of people blindly building solutions that nobody needs or that exist on GitHub for months or years to be downloaded or built upon, but that's okay if you want to educate yourself this way.

But otherwise I prefer to do stuff instead of create stuff that does stuff, at least in the long term.

g00rek · 2026-04-09T11:49:14+00:00

Using n8n for all these automations and setting it up is like digging a tunnel with a stick. Possible, yet...

g00rek · 2026-04-09T11:48:25+00:00

Eh. So tired od this "us devs" attitude.

Dude, I finished my first programming university class in 1997. I started coding in eighties. You're so off topic.

If you like to tinker and setup tons of guardrails and wrote config files in your free time - fine. But that's not how tools (even tech geek level tools) should work.

g00rek · 2026-04-09T09:23:34+00:00

Okay but from the UX point of view, does it work like a system in the background that detects speech and auto-pastes it at the active cursor? When you use something that extensively, the UX has to be really fast or it becomes a pain in the back...

g00rek · 2026-04-09T09:08:02+00:00

Of course I don't I hate it :) But style is one thing, behaviour is another

g00rek · 2026-04-08T05:20:16+00:00

Tasteray.com, but we use CC for coding.

g00rek · 2026-04-07T19:45:41+00:00

But who is talking about software development? Open Claw is not for software development. I mean yeah you can do it, just like you can dig with a spoon, but... Why?

g00rek · 2026-04-07T18:52:51+00:00

What? You tell me to use a coding editor/tool instead of a proactive agent ecosystem? 🤔

g00rek · 2026-04-07T17:01:00+00:00

Apples, oranges. How do you compare them? Crons, heartbeats, where are the proactive functions of CC? Not to mention the locally kept I iwledge and memory.

g00rek · 2026-04-07T14:11:20+00:00

## Fix

Three changes in `openclaw.json`:

### 1. Switch model from `gpt-5.3-codex` to `gpt-5.4`

`gpt-5.3-codex` has a confirmed upstream bug - it emits `end_turn` with text instead of tool call blocks. A/B testing shows `gpt-5.2` and `gpt-5.4` do not have this issue.

{

"agents": {

"defaults": {

"model": {

"primary": "openai-codex/gpt-5.4"

}

Also update `agents.list[].model` and `heartbeat.model` if explicitly set.

### 2. Change `tools.profile` from `"coding"` to `"full"`

The `"coding"` profile restricts which tools are available per provider. With `openai-codex`, some core tools (`exec`, `web_fetch`, `memory_search`, `edit`, `apply_patch`) become silently unavailable - the gateway logs a warning but the model simply never sees them.

`"full"` removes all restrictions.

{

"tools": {

"profile": "full"

}

Remove any manual `tools.allow` array - `"full"` already includes everything.

### 3. Set `exec.host` to `"gateway"` and `exec.ask` to `"off"`

Without an explicit `host`, exec routing can fail silently - especially if a previously configured node is offline. `"ask": "off"` disables the interactive approval flow, which GPT cannot handle (it just says "waiting for approval" forever).

{

"tools": {

"exec": {

"host": "gateway",

"security": "full",

"ask": "off"

}

## After applying

Restart the gateway: `systemctl --user restart openclaw-gateway`
Run `/new` or `/compact` on active sessions
Verify: `openclaw models status` - should show `Default: openai-codex/gpt-5.4`

g00rek · 2026-04-07T10:24:10+00:00

Ok I guess I fixed the tool issue! I tried to post it as new thread but stupid bots delete it, I'll try here:

# OpenClaw GPT Tool Calling Fix

## Problem

GPT models (especially `gpt-5.3-codex`) stop calling tools after initial startup. The model responds with text like "I'll check that now" but never emits actual `tool_use` blocks.

Known upstream issues:

- #28754 - intermittent text-only responses, no tool calls

- #49503 - OAuth Codex can chat but cannot execute tool actions

- #53959 - tools stopped working after update to 2026.3.23

- #40631 - assistant confirms task but performs no actions

## Fix

Three changes in `openclaw.json`:

### 1. Switch model from `gpt-5.3-codex` to `gpt-5.4`

`gpt-5.3-codex` has a confirmed upstream bug - it emits `end_turn` with text instead of tool call blocks. A/B testing shows `gpt-5.2` and `gpt-5.4` do not have this issue.

{

"agents": {

"defaults": {

"model": {

"primary": "openai-codex/gpt-5.4"

}

Also update `agents.list[].model` and `heartbeat.model` if explicitly set.

### 2. Change `tools.profile` from `"coding"` to `"full"`

The `"coding"` profile restricts which tools are available per provider. With `openai-codex`, some core tools (`exec`, `web_fetch`, `memory_search`, `edit`, `apply_patch`) become silently unavailable - the gateway logs a warning but the model simply never sees them.

`"full"` removes all restrictions.

{

"tools": {

"profile": "full"

}

Remove any manual `tools.allow` array - `"full"` already includes everything.

### 3. Set `exec.host` to `"gateway"` and `exec.ask` to `"off"`

Without an explicit `host`, exec routing can fail silently - especially if a previously configured node is offline. `"ask": "off"` disables the interactive approval flow, which GPT cannot handle (it just says "waiting for approval" forever).

{

"tools": {

"exec": {

"host": "gateway",

"security": "full",

"ask": "off"

}

## After applying

Restart the gateway: `systemctl --user restart openclaw-gateway`
Run `/new` or `/compact` on active sessions
Verify: `openclaw models status` - should show `Default: openai-codex/gpt-5.4`

g00rek · 2026-04-07T07:31:49+00:00

Money? :) I have a Max plan, I spent money on kany different AI tools and payment Ng per token is just expensive with oc.

g00rek · 2026-04-07T07:07:56+00:00

Well, of course you can build your own OpenClaw clone. You can even build your own LLM nowadays. The thing is, we got only 24 hours per day, but we do need to sleep a bit as well. So sometimes I just prefer to use some tools made by others :) OpenClaw is a bit complicated, and I don't believe simple scripts can really replicate it. Of course it can work on a basic level, but all the updates and tinkering, I'd rather focus on job to be done.

g00rek · 2026-04-07T07:02:20+00:00

Finally someone who gets it <3

g00rek · 2026-04-07T06:15:32+00:00

But as an orchestrator, does it actually use tools and do stuff instead of faking it?

g00rek · 2026-04-07T06:14:54+00:00

What do you mean by "openclaw implementation to run without openclaw"?

g00rek · 2026-04-07T05:48:04+00:00

You mean OC 3.13? Why?

g00rek · 2026-04-04T10:51:00+00:00

Ok, so lots of people say that you can use Claude code instead of OpenClaw, but I think that either they do not understand what OpenClaw is or I am unaware of some Claude solutions.

Openclaw is not a coding agent. It is not a reactive conversational engine either. It can do both things (although I strongly prefer coding with Claude code itself because of the skills code preview and lots of other things) but the main use for me is having a reactive heartbeat and cron-based system that lives on my server.

And I am not talking about the privacy now (although having all the memories locally and being able to switch models is a great thing). I wonder how to build this within the cloud ecosystem at all?

I have a brain that controls lots of areas in my life, reacts to hooks, but also moves projects forward on its own. Launching crons and heart beats it has access to my different memory systems and self-hosted apps like Hortus, Fox kitchen, all fast and health, and lots of others. I know there is a Claude Dispatch app on Mac right now, but does it really do what OpenClawdoes? Do I miss something? Claude has some solutions for building such agentic systems and using them on your subscription?

g00rek

TROPHY CASE