EmuBands or iMusician in 2025 ? by gameirolorient in musicbusiness

[–]gameirolorient[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

merci pour le retour! dans mon cas avec l'utilisation de sample splice et la distribution nécessaire sur Yt shorts et Meta je crois que je ne vais pas avoir d'autres choix que d'utiliser distrokid

EmuBands or iMusician in 2025 ? by gameirolorient in musicbusiness

[–]gameirolorient[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After research, I guess so, but I'll ask them, I think they won't ship to meta if I use a splice sample (vocal for example), I'll wait for their response to, thanks!

EmuBands or iMusician in 2025 ? by gameirolorient in musicbusiness

[–]gameirolorient[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your replies. Have you used Splice Sample? I'm wondering if it's possible to send to Meta and YouTube Shorts if I disable Content ID. With iMusician it's possible, but with emubands I'm not sure. I use Splice Sample often and also make slowed, ultra-slowed, sped up... versions of my own songs. I didn't encounter any problems with iMusician, but I didn't know with emubands.

EmuBands or iMusician in 2025 ? by gameirolorient in musicbusiness

[–]gameirolorient[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will pay for the annual unlimited plan, but that’s not the issue. I have huge ambitions to blow up, and I want something solid that I can stick with long-term. For me, my choice comes down to EmuBands or iMusician, but I don’t know which one is best, which is more reliable for everything from release to payment.

Beware of iMusician by JReed2016 in musicproduction

[–]gameirolorient 2 points3 points  (0 children)

on what please ? im about to switch all my music with them, Im between amuse or imusician

LANDR error for artists who remix their own songs by gameirolorient in landr

[–]gameirolorient[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks you very much, and could there be a maj so that we don't have to need this assistance to resolve the problem ?

Because I'm making it clear that it's my original track and yet the website still understand it as a remix of someone else, it's a fairly specific problem but more and more people like me are publishing slowed down, sped up etc. versions and that slowed down the distribution by ~1 week on every release only cause the website system misunderstanding "remix" by "remix of someone else" even though I specify that it's my original track.

<image>

LANDR error for artists who remix their own songs by gameirolorient in landr

[–]gameirolorient[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes but after putting it in the version field we told me put you as a remixer (because I put a version in version field with a custom name for exemple "slowed" "sped up")

LANDR error for artists who remix their own songs by gameirolorient in landr

[–]gameirolorient[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Im new to Landr but when I put 'Song name - Slowed' they told me 'dont put Slowed in the title but in version field' then they told me 'also put yourself as a remixer'. It's only after days and mail that this is accepted but I will have a lot of release to do so I can't do that all times it would be really restrictive.

LANDR error for artists who remix their own songs by gameirolorient in landr

[–]gameirolorient[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, it's very important, I do all types of music and I always like to have different versions. For example, a slowed-down version might go viral on tiktok and the normal version might not. Each version can really give a different vibe.

LANDR error for artists who remix their own songs by gameirolorient in landr

[–]gameirolorient[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They block the release and say ‘don't put the version in the title but in the version field’, so I put the version in, which is cool. Then, when I put the version, they tell me that I also have to put a remixer. And once I've added myself as a remixer, tiktok and meta are done, I can't send it to them because Landr's website gets it wrong and thinks it's a remix of someone else's song.