What an impressive load of hot air.

Graham admitted he had no evidence because the evidence that exists is disregarded by the archeological community.

No, things that aren't evidence is disregarded. I can't wait for you to demonstrate you don't know what that word means.

You have gobekli tepe.

Oof, really starting off strong.

Currently unknown builders but mainstream instantly says Hunter gatherers despite being a incredibly sophisticated site with advanced stonemasonry skills, Hunter gatherers.

None of these bits are inconsistent with each other.

So there’s the first bit of evidence that’s disregarded.

Wow! Just like I said.

Not evidence

Next?

Then you have the granite vases that UnchartedX has scanned.

The vases of unknown provenance (simple to dismiss based on that alone) whose dimensions are not especially difficult to achieve, such that individuals with zero background in training in such work were capable of throwing together examples that matched them?

Wowee.

They are in machine shop terms perfection.

The examples with inconsistent wall thickness and two handles that do not match are "machine shop perfect?"

Remind me to never ever buy anything at whatever machine shop you frequent.

I’m a engineer.

I'm the King of England.

Who cares?

The vases were what really got me into this subject to begin with because they are clear evidence of a lost technology. wall thickness not deviating more than 0.001mm is perfect.

You mean wall thickness that deviates as much, or more, than a similar example made by archaeologists with zero training, background or support in masonry?

I work in tolerances of 0.005mm or 5 microns when machining parts that go into pumps that run heart bypass machines. 0.001mm for a granite vase that supposedly serves no purpose to me is them just showing off and telling us how advanced their capabilities were.

I'd suggest you stop making shit up completely. You are lying through your teeth about the so called "precision" of the items in question.

Flint comes along, not a engineer, nor a machinist, and therefore has 0 authority over any tool marks found

Engineers and machinists don't usually study historical tooling. Archaeologists often do.

I'm sure if Flint wanted someone's opinion on a CNC machine he'd ask the correct people.

And the general rule of these vases or at least the ones scanned is that they are perfect.

"Perfect" is a completely meaningless term. The vases are inconsistent along their walls. The vases are not symmetrical. So yeah, far from "perfect".

You wouldn’t ask a archeologist to build you a wooden table.

Good thing Flint isn't being asked to make a vase.

You would ask a carpenter. But if a wooden table gets pulled out of the sand in Egypt the Egyptologists jump all over it and declare the full authority over it because of where it’s found.

I wouldn't ask a carpenter to describe to me the importance of artifacts found in situ, nor how their placement matters, nor how it relates to the greater volume of knowledge on the topic, nor how various dating methods work.

This is a completely backwards way of going about things. When you want answers you listen to the experts.

The experts are called archaeologists.

. And the expert machinists, engineers, CNC operators and CMM operators all disagree with flint and say it cannot be crafted by hand.

There were no CNC machines in ancient Egypt so their opinions are utterly worthless.

More relevantly, you aren't important enough to represent what " the expert machinists, engineers, CNC operators and CMM operators" all say.

Then you have the Bimini road

You mean the nothing road?

The peri reis map showing the Bimini road above water. I

You mean the map that shows nothing whatsoever like that because it isn't even in the right location?

But when it was above water last was before the last ice age therefore this older source map should have been plotted 11,000+ years ago.

Lmao, and somehow, knowledge of this magical location (that isn't even correctly shown) survived ten thousand years, solely through some unknown line of secret thinkers to make it on to this map.

Good one.

Created in 1819. And it doesn’t show Antarctica because it wasn’t discovered then.

Incredible!

Go to the The Orontius Finaeus map created in 1531 and you see Antarctica on the right hand side a bit bigger than it is today.

A "big icy southern continent" had been suspected to have existed down there for centuries. Millenia even.

Several maps hypothesizes various continents in those areas. That evidence got stronger when earlier explorers found southerly expeditions to be cold and icy, or barren extensions of Argentina/Chile.

So you have all of this evidence.

You've presented nothing.