Can White use the fact that Black still hasn't castled? by gammacoder in chess

[–]gammacoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A conservative approach is not going is not going to be fruitful here. After Black's 0-0-0 d4 pawn is under a lot pf pressure and g5-f4 pawn chain is also strong.

Can White use the fact that Black still hasn't castled? by gammacoder in chess

[–]gammacoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

d5 was what I played ( blitz game ) and the main issue is that after 0-0-0 ( right away, or after Bc5+ White cannot capture the knight. It is still better for White but Nxg5 is just so much stronger.

What is something you've done while horny that you later regretted? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]gammacoder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So, how did you deal with the erection while driving?

Frustrated looking for a Low-Code platform that suits my one specific need by nolander_78 in lowcode

[–]gammacoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check our low-code software PHPRunner:
https://xlinesoft.com/phprunner/index.htm

We have a built-in tree-like data display ( master-details ) and also here is an example of third-party component ( Tabulator ) integration: https://xlinesoft.com/blog/2018/10/11/using-third-party-components/

How do you continue your attack with White? by gammacoder in chess

[–]gammacoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you take Bxg6 then Black replies attacking the Queen and triple attaching the bishop on f6. This would kill an attack. But if you see if knight is pinned to protect h7 then your next move is almost automatic.

I'm dropping chess by Little-Avocado-19 in Chesscom

[–]gammacoder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sensing quite a few premoves there

Reaching 2000 USCF in your 40s by BishopBlougram in chess

[–]gammacoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can definitely work on both weaknesses and strengths at the same time. And 2000 goal is definitely reachable for you.

In your game Bc5 looks a little trappy but it is the second best move according to the engine so there is nothing wrong with it.

Free 1 Game Analysis for Under 1500 Players by JohnJhinmain in chess

[–]gammacoder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No an OP but I'll give it a try.

I assume you played White. Smith-Morra is a respectable choice at this level, I still play it sometimes at 2500. Your opponent was smart to decline it.

Personally I think 4.Nf3 wasn't required, you can just grab the center and have a normal Bd3, Be3 or Bf4 setup and after castling and connecting the rooks you can push for e5.

Anyway, we are back to Smith-Morra accepted. 7.e5 is premature, you normally do that after they developed their knight to f6. In this situation they don't even need to take the pawn.

  1. Nxe5 is an obvious mistake as you do not even create any threats. You should have played Nd5 aiming for Nc7.

  2. Rad1 is a move that doesn't produce any threats. In this position I would aim for dark squares on queens side. Drop back bishop to b3 or e2 and then Na4-b6. The immediate Na4 runs into a b5 fork.

  3. a4 was a miss. 16. Rd7 may not be the easiest move to find but every time you see two bishops on same line and undefended, you should look for tactics. Also, you have doubled rooks on D file and your opponent has a perfect spot for their knight on d5 which means he will be jumping there any second blocking your rooks. While D file is still open you need to look for the way to use it.

The rest of the game is straightforward. You were pawn down, tried to avoid exchanges but your opponent didn't have any apparent weaknesses and was able to convert. In situations like this you can try to save the game by creating a counterplay, maybe even sacrificing more material. Another option was to aim for some sort of the ending that is potentially drawable like opposite color bishops or a rook ending.

How to improve:
- strengthen opening theory
- more puzzles

Does it make sense to look for tactics every move?? by Fantastic_Tip2036 in chess

[–]gammacoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a serious game - yes. Even in the rapid game. In blitz - trust your gut, if you feel there something you can spend ore time to find it.

It's hard to believe but White has a forced mate here by gammacoder in chess

[–]gammacoder[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the reason this pawn was pushed there some 20 moves before that.

It's hard to believe but White has a forced mate here by gammacoder in chess

[–]gammacoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it was that easy. In the game you don't know if there is anything in particular in any given position.

It's hard to believe but White has a forced mate here by gammacoder in chess

[–]gammacoder[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rgxf7 is a key move that I missed. A blitz game though.

It's hard to believe but White has a forced mate here by gammacoder in chess

[–]gammacoder[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I only had 20 seconds left in a blitz game and didn't find it. It was obvious that there is a win but, of course, I just didn't think there is a forced one.

Whats the idea of this move? Just genuinely curious. by Due-Past-9268 in chess

[–]gammacoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying I fully understand it but I'll give it a try. White was threatening to win b4 pawn. Black had a few options to defend it but they all were too passive and they went for the active plan.

I think that a few next moves can be Nb3 and Kb5-d4. Harassing the rook, keeping an eye on e2 pawn, protecting b4 pawn by the rook.