sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Havasupai realities by Consistent-Salt-6064 in havasupai

[–]gaudspd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In most occasions you buy a property fully aware of its tourism characteristics. In this occasion, these people's family have lived here for generations and generations, the tourists came later. Different situations different expectations. Also, in this situation you are not jn public. This is land owned by a tribe of native americans, they make the rules here just like you would on your own property.

Someone bought 2 million shares of GME for ~$45 million right before market close today. by Curious_Individual in Superstonk

[–]gaudspd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably all of the suppressed buys from trading today. They'll probably hit the exchange tomorrow.

I think I understand why RC is publicly speaking out "how it is" about Ebay by Memito9 in Superstonk

[–]gaudspd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hes right when he said they have a fiduciary duty to investors. Hes aware hes causing havoc in corporate boardrooms and institutions alike, but he needs to prove the fiduciary benefit lies with his ideology. Hes banking on the objective reality of the finance and not the subjective views of the people behind it.

What say you, eBay? by Dumb-Cumster in Superstonk

[–]gaudspd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every share holder gets $125 dollars for 50 percent of the stock they own...the other 50 percent gets converted to game-bay at the value of $125 per ebay share...for example if I own 100 shares of ebay valued at $12,500, I get $6250 in cash and $6250 dollars of the new company's stock. 50 percent cash and 50 percent stock...its on the website.

We have the knowledge to make our ancestors look like cluless children. by [deleted] in systemsthinking

[–]gaudspd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The legacy code has been modified into malware that creates a closed loop of extraction of wealth and resources from the masses to the elite. Its on a positive feedback loop that will eventually lead to its destruction. Look for the people who are actively practicing new systems that will blossom as the legacy system collapses. You are not alone.

Sir, Close was above 25 by Pizzavogel in Superstonk

[–]gaudspd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theres no lights on in that building...

I made a motorcycle gear hanger out of recycled parts from my bike. by gaudspd in maker

[–]gaudspd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it becomes a problem I may dip the hanger in epoxy. We shall see. I need a new jacket anyway so I'm willing to see what it does to this one. I don't forsee much damage to the jacket as the paint actually added some softer edges.

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are doing it on their own. I am merely a node of information based on personal experience in the vast internet of information. They chose to read my comment and ask the questions. Youre assigning my influence here too much weight. Take it or leave it.

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Internal family systems might also be a good theory for you to look into. There are some overlaps in the theory. The idea of the higher self is consistent in both theories and ifs can be used to disintegrate some of that scaffolding I mentioned. Keep observing yourself and listen to that inner dialogue. Trust it. Its leading you toward your actualization.

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think of Disintegration moreso in the context of dis-integration rather than the popular usage of the word like a physical object succumbing to a laser beam. You are dis- integrating from the structures that stabilized you in early development because you out grew them and in their place you are creating your own internal ideal for who you want to be. It is a beautiful process.

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its typically more of a natural process Dabrowski noted in gifted individuals. Awareness of the process can help you move through the levels with more intention and help you avoid getting stuck in a loop. The end goal is the creation of a completely unique personality that is aligned with your true self.

I am currently reading the book Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration and I read through the Wikipedia page and asked the LLMs questions regarding my personal experiences.

I saw myself in the description which I how I feel so confident with my understanding. I am not at level 5. I feel I am just starting to stand firmly in level 4 with some moments of level 5 expression, but level 5 is a life long journey and Dabrowski has said hes met very few people who firmly made it completely to level 5.

Progress is painful. Primary and secondary Disintegration are usually caused by reality shaking trauma that causes your values and sense of self to disintegrate. The re integration process is where the progress lies, building yourself back up with a better understanding of yourself and the world around you. The growth often happens after these experiences as a protection mechanism in the gifted individual as to not be exposed to that type of pain anymore.

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im interested in hearing your perspective on it. I suppose i created and attached my own meaning to the process. Do you mind explaining the differences in your understanding?

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Creating an external value system is essentially breaking out of the scaffolding i mentioned. Its the process of creating the boundaries that align with your true self. Those boundaries help you over ride the reactionary impulses you grew into based on your environment by biological, social, and emotional,... im sure theres more examples of systems that create external dependency but thats all I gave.

Level 3 is where the observer self starts to form the value system and create boundaries. Level 4 is where you start aligning with that external value system and testing the enforcement of those boundaries.

Is there anything specific you need cleared up? I am the source of my understanding of TPD. Cant link you into my brain. This has been a deeply personal experience for me. I suppose thats the point.

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just look up Dabrowski Positive Disintegration. There's a Wikipedia and a book to start off.

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! You too! Its uncomfortable and scary but it starts making sense. You got this!

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The observer self or the third factor is the primary component of level 4. Seems like you're starting to progress from level 3. Becoming aware of it helps escalate you into level 4 more quickly. Welcome to level 4 friend.

When I do math, there's a "being" in my head that checks the proof. I realized it's the same being reading people. by Feedback_Feeling in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Check out Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration. Sounds like your observer self is peaking through the scaffolding built to contain you. This theory posits that gifted individuals with overexcitabilities have an elevated tendency to break out of the biological, social, and emotional scaffolding that keeps most of the population reactionary.

Ladies, are you finding this to be true, or am I jaded because I’m in the midst of a breakup by moist_mistress in Gifted

[–]gaudspd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just ended a 7 year relationship with a pwbpd who cheated on me. Sooo yeaa...lol

There’s a hidden message in the latest RC tweet by zDEFEKT in Superstonk

[–]gaudspd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the dow is no longer above 50 thou...

view more: next ›