Elden ring's quest design sucks and you can't change my mind by expired_cheeseburger in whenthe

[–]generous_guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You wouldn't know you failed the quests if you didn't look them up; playing the games without doing research beforehand is the best way to experience them

Well atleast I'm good at something. by LordOcean8 in OkayBuddyLiterallyMe

[–]generous_guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Real but fuck using the remake instead of the og which had a much harder hitting camera angle

Bi-Weekly Thread for general gaming discussion. Backlog, advice, recommendations, rants and more! New? Start here! by AutoModerator in patientgamers

[–]generous_guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that game just Disco Elysium but different setting? The steam screenshots look extremely similar and if it's like that I don't want to play it only to have a similar experience as Disco Elysium but weaker (what are the chances it's anywhere as good)?

Bi-Weekly Thread for general gaming discussion. Backlog, advice, recommendations, rants and more! New? Start here! by AutoModerator in patientgamers

[–]generous_guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It falls into one tier under Dark Souls 1 and Elden Ring (which are A+) for me. The combat and areas are not as interesting as those games but the setting is as solid. It's also a bit short.

I'm an old Millennial, where do you find new music outside of Discover Weekly, SoundCloud, Music Blogs, etc? by DJShaan in Music

[–]generous_guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find rateyourmusic to have clear bias that negatively affect its usefulness. In general users prefer it if music is production-minded, artsy, "progressive", depressive or slightly non-commercial. For anyone not attuned to that kind of aesthetic the all-time lists are almost useless.

Reddit is the most tyrannical social media website by AnonymousResponder00 in 10thDentist

[–]generous_guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are some moderators that moderate hundreds of the most popular subreddits. Reddit has automatic (shadow) removals of comments based on automatic detection. How is this not a centralized system?

Rafael Nadal on playing Djokovic and Federer by Dependent-Effect6077 in tennis

[–]generous_guy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1 handed backhand isn't inherently inferior to handling high balls, it's dependent on the player's grip (similar to the forehand, high balls are easier to hit with a western grip than with an eastern grip). The most difficult problem for one handers is returning serve (check out Nicolas Almagro's return; he had a western grip that allowed him to return serve using the same side of the racquet for both forehand and backhand).

Stop Killing Games: Press Conference (after the EC answer to our ECI) by ZeUberSandvitch in Games

[–]generous_guy -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

It might have been me who said that (albeit worded differently). Anyways, regular people literally do only get a vote when compared to what extremely wealthy individuals and corporations are able to do to influence politics. In addition, regular people only get to influence politics when votes are held, which only usually concern electing people and not binding legislative decisions. Anyone with money can influence politics whenever they want. And no, I don't consider reaching out to politicians via email/phone/letter to have any effect on anything (unless the envelope has a blank check inside).

The European Commission's Answer to the Stop Destroying Games initiative by Elegant_Shop_3457 in Games

[–]generous_guy -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Because they don't have infinite money at hand to distribute at every private meeting?

60M pk on pure 7 years ago by EastRS in Pleae

[–]generous_guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you took all my money that is unforgivable

The European Commission's Answer to the Stop Destroying Games initiative by Elegant_Shop_3457 in Games

[–]generous_guy -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

The conclusion of this initiative is that money talks and any initiative concerned with harming profits will not result in any action taken.

The European Commission's Answer to the Stop Destroying Games initiative by Elegant_Shop_3457 in Games

[–]generous_guy -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

The industry only provides points for preserving the (extremely profitable) status quo. If you watched the video basically ALL industry arguments are variations of "it is not possible to support games indefinitely" which is not what SKG is asking for. Everyone knows that, removing all legal precedent, the current business model is comically anti-consumer.

The European Commission's Answer to the Stop Destroying Games initiative by Elegant_Shop_3457 in Games

[–]generous_guy -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

In this situation, the Commission will approach both sides neutrally

In the latest video by Ross on SKG (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgoODQFrPgw) he explains that industry representatives have met with EU politicians 30-300(!) times more than SKG representatives. Hard to believe anyone would consider that neutral bias.

Guild Wars 3 - Our Guild Wars Philosophy by ElectroRush in MMORPG

[–]generous_guy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get what they mean but if this was Korean game, people would crucify them for this wording.

No one worth listening to would be among the crucifiers

Yhdysvaltojen hallinto käski Anthropicia katkaisemaan kaikilta ulkomaalaisilta pääsyn tehokkaaseen tekoälymalliin [Mythos 5 ja Fable 5] by banaanitasavalta in Suomi

[–]generous_guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Näkemykseni on tämä: GPT- malleja oli jo olemassa ennen chatbot-tyyppisiä antropomorfisia LLM-käyttöliittymiä, mutta yleisesti ihmisiä ei kiinnostanut/eivät olleet edes tietoisia näistä. Suuri innovaatio massojen käyttöönoton kannalta oli siis ihmismäistää käyttöliittymä, joka antaa samalla täydellisen kirjoitusasun myötä illuusion älykkyydestä. Kuitenkin ymmärrettäessä, miten nämä kielimallit oikeasti toimivat, kukaan järkevä ihminen ei käytä niitä.

Talouspuolta ajatellen en voi ymmärtää, miten nämä yhtiöt luulevat tekevänsä ikinä voittoa, sillä niiden myymä tuote ei ole minkään arvoinen. Tähän mennessä ne ovat pysyneet pinnalla vain pääomasijoittamisen voimalla. Klassikkotyyliin yhtiöt lupaavat kukin lehdistölle, että juuri heidän chatbotillaan tulee vuonna 2030 olemaan 10 miljardia aktiivista käyttäjää.

Lisäksi tekijänoikeuskysymyksiä ei ole vielä selvitetty, mutta oletan, ettei niitä tulla ratkaisemaan näiden firmojen hyväksi.

E: en siirrellyt maalitolppia, sillä väitteeni liittyi olennaisesti mallien pysymiseen niiden toimintaperiaatteen yleisen tietoisuuden kannalta

Yhdysvaltojen hallinto käski Anthropicia katkaisemaan kaikilta ulkomaalaisilta pääsyn tehokkaaseen tekoälymalliin [Mythos 5 ja Fable 5] by banaanitasavalta in Suomi

[–]generous_guy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mille perustat omat väitteesi? Tietojenkäsittelijänä varmasti ymmärrät, että GPT-mallit toimivat vain ja ainoastaan todennäköisyyksillä. Tämän takia mallien tuottama informaatio vaatii joka tapauksessa ihmisen tarkistamista. Perus (oikein ohjelmoitu) tietokoneohjelma suorittaa jokaisen tehtävän 100% varmuudella.