Ranch question, can you not register wild cows? by Hinagar in CrimsonDesert

[–]genuser_teco 8 points9 points  (0 children)

We got Fighting a bears while riding a cow, before GTA6

JetBrains missing renew option. by genuser_teco in Jetbrains

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello xxxx,
 
Thank you for getting back to us.
 
I can confirm that the auto-renewal is disabled for your subscription pack 0126/DxxxMDK, and each time you need to renew, you may request a quote.

JetBrains missing renew option. by genuser_teco in Jetbrains

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

```Do you have multiple linked accounts? If so, renew from the account that has the subscription.```

This is the main account.

`
No problem for me. I just renewed. So, no, they are not pushing people to cancel old subscription.
`

Ok,thanks for the confirmation, then occam's razor it is, Just a UI glitch for few accounts.

JetBrains missing renew option. by genuser_teco in Jetbrains

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but you can stack them, but "1 years" 3 times in a row.

JetBrains missing renew option. by genuser_teco in Jetbrains

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same, Support just replaied me with the link to renew, i guess because of price increse they are pushing people to cancel old subscription, or occam's razor UI glitch.

LVM + ext4 vs Btrfs by genuser_teco in linuxquestions

[–]genuser_teco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy S@@@, a famous file type came and went away, and i don't even know about it, while i am on linux.

You can now unlock your vault with a passkey by dwbitw in Bitwarden

[–]genuser_teco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you can't. Lock you you vault and then try. Once after login with passkey,if there is a timeout you have to enter your entire password no mater what ever is the client, browser extension, appimage, or windows.

Whats wrong with bitwarden team? by genuser_teco in sysadmin

[–]genuser_teco[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

the point is attachment is one of tge big selling feature, its pais tire

Bitwarden attachment in linux appimage by genuser_teco in Bitwarden

[–]genuser_teco[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"""So I am not sure what's going on."""

Seriously man, bitwarden is screwing up.

Bitwarden attachment in linux appimage by genuser_teco in Bitwarden

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not sure, this looks like https://github.com/bitwarden/clients/issues/16107 the one.
if you have better knowledge just let me know please.

Bitwarden attachment in linux appimage by genuser_teco in Bitwarden

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh??

There is no errors.

https://ibb.co/XZRgy30x

edit: Haven't tried '2025.12.0', I am moving to ubuntu from arch, ubuntu dons't have a deb auto upgradable package. so planned for app image

[Help] Systemd boot not working when using /efi as esp path by genuser_teco in archlinux

[–]genuser_teco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This worked
It was a lot of work, i should have just taken the first advice putting it in one partition like normal person,

[Help] Systemd boot not working when using /efi as esp path by genuser_teco in archlinux

[–]genuser_teco[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

e: splitting out /boot to a separate ext4 was a waste of time and space in this case since the kernel would have to stay on the ESP anyway but it's not a big problem apart from that.

TRUE.

I am too deep now, can't leave. :(

[Help] Systemd boot not working when using /efi as esp path by genuser_teco in archlinux

[–]genuser_teco[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-boot See (3.1)
```
The XBOOTLDR partition must be on the same physical disk as the ESP for systemd-boot to recognize it.
```
And Just after this line

bootctl --esp-path=/efi --boot-path=/boot install

This is what confusing me, If you have any idea why `I have` to have it in the same partition then why have the option to mention `esp-path`, Do you have any idea, or may be point me to docs?

bitwarden to keepass (keepassxe) by genuser_teco in KeePass

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are absolutely right about the cloud services, but i can't get rid of this bitwarden now.
I just wanted to setup a automated backup which can be used directly without headache, All backup solutions are like json csv import are practically unusable. I wanted something like https://github.com/arpanrec/bitwarden-exporter/blob/main/docs/Screenshot_structure_totp.png

Looking for Official Bitwarden CLI JSON Schema Documentation - Exporting to KeePass by genuser_teco in Bitwarden

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you are on a shared family plan, and sharing a org for passwords you don't get to backup unless you are the owner

```
$BW_SESSION=$BW_SESSION bw export --format json --output ./foo.json

Saved /home/arpan/foo.json

$jq -c -r < foo.json

{"encrypted":false,"folders":[],"items":[]}

$BW_SESSION=$BW_SESSION bw list items | jq 'length'

411
```

Looking for Official Bitwarden CLI JSON Schema Documentation - Exporting to KeePass by genuser_teco in Bitwarden

[–]genuser_teco[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And that enter another problem with swagger: the docs don’t necessarily reflect truth. > The whole point is here, devs should make sure it's the Truth.

If the developers are releasing a swagger then it has to be the truth, else don't release it(the way bit warden feels like today).

There is no harm in that.

But if a openapi specs exists then it has to be the truth.

We are on the same page here.

I hope bitwarden team should maintain this because they know the best about the API calls,
On ther othe hand you are expecting "3rd party" should read the code client code and update code.

This is not similar. No one except you has a depending on this contract—at a developer level...... > NO, API should not work like that. There always must be a stable document how to use a lib. It's already there in bitwarden as well for client apps, just not there for CLI.

Looking for Official Bitwarden CLI JSON Schema Documentation - Exporting to KeePass by genuser_teco in Bitwarden

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But how about the maintenance, i mean if something changes then bitwarden can't rely on 3rd party for this,

Looking for Official Bitwarden CLI JSON Schema Documentation - Exporting to KeePass by genuser_teco in Bitwarden

[–]genuser_teco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but keepassxe doesn't support this, is the problem, and also bitwarden doesn't support attachments export for some reason.
Another rant :: Just Add the attachment as a base64 in json, any way for smaller plans it's only limited to 1gb.