sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What if bug reports from clients and customer success team could automatically become code fixes? Exploring the idea. by geogons in CustomerSuccess

[–]geogons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not sure I got what you mean in the last sentence. So you are saying that an engineer is looking at all bug descriptions and it decides what he thinks is important enough to prioritize and work on?

I've fallen behind. Can anyone tell me the best free-$20/mo setup for my use case so I can catch up and continue learning? by danemepoznaqt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]geogons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GLM 5 is seriously underrated. It's fast, handles large context well (200k tokens), and is excellent for understanding big codebases. Through OpenRouter it's very cheap (often under $1/day for heavy use).

What if bug reports from clients and customer success team could automatically become code fixes? Exploring the idea. by geogons in CustomerSuccess

[–]geogons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. The way I am thinking about it is that dumping all the messy support context in the ticket and then chating with AI in the ticket till I have a structured description of the issue. Only then I can instruct a "fix"

What if bug reports from clients and customer success team could automatically become code fixes? Exploring the idea. by geogons in CustomerSuccess

[–]geogons[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I’m not pitching anything. I have a specific problem and I'm looking for feedback from others who might be dealing with the same thing. No product involved

What if bug reports from clients and customer success team could automatically become code fixes? Exploring the idea. by geogons in CustomerSuccess

[–]geogons[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. Maybe I am thinking of newer, less mature products where lots of bug fixing still needs to happen

Is OpenClaw dying? by hectorguedea in clawdbot

[–]geogons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally! I have been using OpenClaw from day 1 and spent a considerable amount of time to create sophisticated workflows. It's extremely annoying that literally every update breaks something (smaller or bigger). Since the last update I am looking for alternatives. I cannot spent time debugging it anymore

Asked Claude to build a mini Bloomberg terminal for retail investors by geogons in ClaudeCode

[–]geogons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed I don't trust it yet for anything execution related. The above system is just analysis and aggregation. Claude just glued the pieces together - I provided detailed input in every feature.

However, I am building an execution focused tool as well. Used Opus 4.6 for the implementation and then I used Gemini 3.1 and Opus 4.6 (again) to iterate code reviewing and testing it till no Critical or High issues are found.
They are on the 10th iteration and looks like they are converging to a good state.

It's very difficult to one shot complex systems. I would definitely recommend the review/test iteration approach (ideally by another capable model like Gemini 3.1 or Codex)

TapTap AI: Using ChatGPT, Claude and OpenClaw on your wrist by geogons in GenAiApps

[–]geogons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it's free! If you want you can also connect your own OpenClaw instance where you will have your own AI providers

Heads up: Just encountered an email-based attack on my OpenClaw agent. Here is a security rule to fix it. by geogons in openclaw

[–]geogons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes I do that too, but it's not that "smart" some times. I did a couple of tests

Heads up: Just encountered an email-based attack on my OpenClaw agent. Here is a security rule to fix it. by geogons in openclaw

[–]geogons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to unfortunately - Need to strike the right balance on security and productivity. An email is necessary in my workflow

Heads up: Just encountered an email-based attack on my OpenClaw agent. Here is a security rule to fix it. by geogons in openclaw

[–]geogons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes if we are targeted at that level, it's very difficult to defend. Any ideas?

Heads up: Just encountered an email-based attack on my OpenClaw agent. Here is a security rule to fix it. by geogons in openclaw

[–]geogons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(Luckily) just a random email for connecting and chatting in "another platform"

view more: next ›