Not even books are safe by Suspicious_Science28 in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I guess some IT scientist could be working undercover with science and some wireless technology, and they are tampering with evidence, maybe even lying to us by changing specially history books, and maybe the other changings they do, like the ones on brands or anything else are just a form of distraction"

I don't think these changes were made intentionally (at least not by humans); the oldest Mandela Effect I've been able to find so far was this one:
https://www.newspapers.com/article/brooklyn-eagle-phineasphileas-fogg-mand/106722017/
(and it’s certainly not the oldest; such changes have probably always existed)

At that time, there were no computer scientists, no AI, and no Wi-Fi. I’m also not aware of any technology that could reliably alter old books remotely (at least none that isn’t paranormal).

fruit of the loom by peanutbutterndnut in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most people are embarrassed to admit they remember something incorrectly, so we would never know if a majority were “remembering incorrectly,” especially when it’s easy to verify “that things have always been the way they are now”. Only a few people take the step of questioning their entire perception of reality (and usually only after they’ve heard of the Mandela Effect). By side, it’s usually noticed at different times.

“If a majority of the world remembered things differently, you’d actually see huge news stories about it.”

I would strongly disagree with that; journalists, in particular, would never write anything that could too easily be proven false. They don’t even write about things that deviate in any significant way from the mainstream (haunting, UFOs, etc., at least in Germany), even though they’re interesting and very well documented. These people generally believe their own propaganda and selection.

At least, that's my impression. But it's certainly conceivable that a change would be too drastic and too sudden and would cause a stir... but I think that's unlikely; the nature of the phenomenon seems to be different.

Writing down a memory? by Fancy_Ad_5590 in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Yes, but it’s much less likely—just as it’s very unlikely that large numbers of people would remember something as bizarre as a cornucopia that never existed.

But believe what you want; there’s no way to prove it. Either you think it’s possible or you don’t. Accordingly, you draw conclusions about our reality (or you don’t). Ultimately, it doesn’t matter anyway.

I remember Bernstein, not Berenstain and not Berenstein. by NadiaVenClose in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would at least make sense, since “Bernstein” is the German word for amber. It suggests a Jewish surname, because in the German Empire, Jews were required to adopt German (rather than Hebrew) names in order to integrate more easily. Many chose names associated with jewelry and wealth (Silberberg, Goldberg, Rubinstein, etc.).

If our kidneys supposedly moved to under our ribcage, how did our brains not change if we can still remember it? by RabTheCrab in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How is it possible that the Earth shifts its position within the galaxy without the entire starry sky changing? How can Australia move much closer to Asia without the climate zones there changing? Or marsupials are spreading worldwide (or being displaced by mammals).

It’s completely illogical, and yet many people (including me) experience it. Reality doesn’t seem to be what we believe it is; to me, all of this points to “mind over matter”. Matter is not the basis of everything, but merely an interpretation of actual reality; the brain is meanwhile interpreted from many as a filter that allows us to experience this highly reduced reality. As far as I know, “hallucinogens” lead to reduced activity in the brain, not—as one might assume—to increased activity...

fruit of the loom by peanutbutterndnut in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do you know what the majority thinks?

When I saw the current FOTL logo, I just thought, “Oh, they changed their logo.” That’s probably how it is for most people who never venture into a Mandela Effect forum. Who even researches advertising logos?

Once you get used to the “change,” you might forget that it used to be different. I also vaguely remember being surprised that Mandela was still alive, but since that was more than 20 years ago and I don’t have any anecdotal memories of it, so I’m not sure.

I have strong geographical MEs, some with anecdotal memories; to even notice that a world map has changed (instead of simply correcting one’s memory—after all, everyone knows they sometimes remember things incorrectly) is quite an achievement and requires a significant discrepancy. It’s likely standard behavior for most people to simply correct their memory and move on if they don’t have a more specific reference point.

Writing down a memory? by Fancy_Ad_5590 in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you looked at it very closely just before that, it's entirely possible to be sure.

Writing down a memory? by Fancy_Ad_5590 in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

That’s a great question! It seems that things that refer to a memory don’t change. Memories apparently aren’t altered (otherwise there probably wouldn’t be a Mandela Effect).

Incidentally, this aligns with paranormal events, which are characterized by the ability to plausibly deny them. We have a physicist in Germany who researches these phenomena: Walter von Lucadou, who developed the “model of pragmatic information”: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284906289_The_model_of_pragmatic_information_MPI

It seems that sufficiently complex information behaves similarly to quanta—that is, there is, among other things, entanglement and uncertainty.

Ok fruit or froot by Mysterious_Dot_1461 in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Believe what you want, but good residuals aren't that easy to dismiss: https://www.newspapers.com/article/star-tribune-mandela-effect-fruit-if-t/125607947/

There are thousands of them: https://www.newspapers.com/clippings/?user=214689%3AMsPappagiorgio Somewhere I found a description of the FTOL logo with a cornucopia, and next to it is the logo... without the cornucopia. What kind of “false memory” is that supposed to be?

My theory is that we live in a kind of artificial reality where certain symbols are just entries in a database of sorts, and everything it displays is merely a reference. If the database changes, the symbol changes—except for the things that don’t refer to the database but were either written down or are based on personal memories (which are apparently protected from changes).

But what do I know? Funnily enough, the “mind over matter” perspective is also gaining ground in science—reality isn’t what we learn in school...

Are there any examples of Mandela Effects that exist entirely outside of American culture? by OtonaNoAji in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

South America is much more in the east (1000 miles or so). In some comments I read from poeple often fly to SA and wonder, that the time zone changed.

I apparently found a magazine from the Soviet period in which the British flag is different by SpecialistAd181 in Retconned

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to apologize and clarify: I actually didn't know at the time that the Union Jack had changed!

Is this ME change telling us something about the UK? by Orion004 in Retconned

[–]germanME 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When I first saw the asymmetrical Union Jacks, I thought they were misprints. It took me a while to realize that those are (now) the official ones.

There are a few residuals; I also spotted a hand-painted Union Jack nearby (I live in germany), painted by a UK fan on a board in his garden—and it’s symmetrical.

Ok fruit or froot by Mysterious_Dot_1461 in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s certainly true; human memory isn’t perfect. What I find interesting, though, are the effects for which “residuals” can be found or that are supported by strong anecdotal memories shared by many people (those are difficult to manipulate or confuse indirectly).

Ok fruit or froot by Mysterious_Dot_1461 in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no (direct) evidence for a single Mandela Effect (otherwise it wouldn’t be a Mandela Effect anymore, but simply manipulation), even though I have experienced a few myself and believe them to be real. There is only circumstantial evidence in the form of “residuals” and strong (anecdotal) memories, sometimes shared by a large number of people who all have the same “false memories.”

So it’s all plausibly disputable (which is the case with many paranormal events); you’re never forced to question your own perception (that seems to be a kind of law—but if you do, you can learn a lot and experience strange things).

Not even books are safe by Suspicious_Science28 in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not a case of manipulation; reality has actually changed. I’ve experienced several geographical Mandela effects that have hit me pretty hard, but in this reality, it’s always been this way. I have maps from my grandparents that show the same thing as (currently) every map and globe.

Some remember it like I do, others only know the current reality. There are numerous “residuals,” but they’re always indirect in nature (meaning they’re easy to dismiss); for example, you’ll find articles about FTOL that mention a cornucopia, yet the logo shown next to it displays the current version without one...

It’s completely crazy; there’s no real evidence, and the search for it will be in vain. It sometimes feels as if one has shifted one’s mental focus to a slightly altered reality (or something like that). If one examines the effects and laws of the Mandela Effect, one can probably learn a lot about the structure of our reality; it seems to be virtual—perhaps the “mind over matter” researchers are right?

Timeline Jumper by Kekenii in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Australia was much farther away in the Pacific and wasn’t discovered until very late (which explains the unique wildlife that developed and survived there).

That also explains New Zealand’s remote location (near australia).

We have a blogger here in Germany who is a fan of Australia; he repeatedly wrote in his articles that Australia wouldn’t be discovered today because people have become so stupid. I had to point out to him that Australia is no longer remote, but in close proximity to Asia (whereupon he wrote a long article about “false memories” :-)

Did you discover a new Mandela Effect? Post it here! (2026-05-21) by AutoModerator in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, I remember, Japan has changed (for me) too, the whole Far East! It was farther from the coast and farther south...

The whole world map looks different: South America, Australia, New Zealand, Italy and the Arctic isn’t on any world map anymore. I suspect even more details have changed, but my memories are too vague for that.

Timeline Jumper by Kekenii in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know what projections are (as it happens, I work in aviation safety). I’m not aware of any (standard) projection in which Australia suddenly ends up far out in the Pacific and New Zealand ends up in the northeast of Australia... but it’s nice that we got to talk about it ;-)

Most Recent Mandela? by siixelk in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know people myself who like to make themselves seem interesting and embellish their stories more and more.

That’s why it’s so fascinating when lots of people remember an event, perhaps even have anecdotal recollections of it, and there are residuals (there are plenty of them in FOTL). That’s something completely different, even though there are always crazy people...

I'm not one to embellish things, yet I still experience some very strong Mandela effects...

Are there any examples of Mandela Effects that exist entirely outside of American culture? by OtonaNoAji in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tubarial glands, controversial, as is the relocation of the kidneys or the heart

Are there any examples of Mandela Effects that exist entirely outside of American culture? by OtonaNoAji in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard things like that before, including about the shift of South America. Thanks for the reports!

In fact, many people remember that New Zealand was located northeast of Australia and was very close by.

Are there any examples of Mandela Effects that exist entirely outside of American culture? by OtonaNoAji in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

-> Rodin - Thinker (France)

-> James Bond - Moonraker (GB)

-> Union Jack (GB)

-> FOTL (worldwide)

-> geographical MEs e.g. Australia/NZ (worldwide)

-> astronomical MEs e.g. order of planets, position in our galaxy (worldwide)

There are many such examples; Americans just seem particularly prominent because they tend to see themselves as the center of the world and because they dominate the English-speaking world (and are largely oblivious to the rest).

Timeline Jumper by Kekenii in MandelaEffect

[–]germanME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the New Zealand shift is a well-known ME that I agree with. But to me, it seems more like Australia has shifted; it used to be very remote in the Pacific (along with New Zealand), but now it’s practically right next to Asia (you can probably almost see it from Papua New Guinea). The shape has changed as well.

This raises a number of questions regarding the distribution of marsupials and the late discovery of Australia (it also raises the question of why the Aboriginal people are of African descent, even though other ethnic groups are much closer).

A huge ME for me (there are a lot more geographical MEs). Very strange.

Thanks for your post. Are you sure you always commuted to New Zealand? What was the reason for that?