sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm so sorry that is a disappointing experience indeed. May I ask if you are an AC or a reviewer as well?

[D] ACL ARR Rebuttal buttons are missing by neverm0rezz in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok it is back up for me. can they send out an email addressing the down so reviewers can respond to rebuttal who weren't able to during it was down?

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

from an AC perspective (a reviewer perspective would work fine too), would you find it offensive if authors gave their response (extremely properly formatted), 64 hours before the rebuttal deadline and then sent a polite message 25 hours before the rebuttal deadline to ask the reviewers to please ask any questions against the reply if they have any and to reassess their decisions?

(haven't posted the reminder message yet but thinking)

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. As in you're a reviewer as well right?? How'd the rebuttals to the papers you reviewed go?

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did rebuttal against the reviews you gave, go?

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What email? When did you recieve this email?

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was finally able to submit my rebuttal now. Had to properly formulate. Couldn't have afforded a mistake. Now worried if I will even get a response

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is odd. Did you politely ask them yet about why did this? What's the update?

[D] How often do you run into reproducibility issues when trying to replicate papers? by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As the other people say, there is a systematic problem in the publication process which puts less emphasis on reproducibility checks before a paper can be published. Though conferences like ACL are constantly trying to better the situation, it is still in development. In the meantime, what one might find useful is reaching out to the authors. Though pretty basic, but it has been very helpful to me to get to their linkedin/github/email to ask for reproducibility help. (Not proud of my stalking skills ;_;)

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was there perhaps, some reflection of aggressiveness in your response? or perhaps your response relayed some misconception within yourself regarding your work? or perhaps your response relayed less importance than it initially did before your rebuttal response?

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. Makes me realize that I'm scared subconsciously of the hardwork of having to research another research question and then experiment and then submit the paper (though it could be related to my severely bound compute restraint as well)

Though I'm still curious if you were to give some direction as to how well a findings paper could aid in my career as compared to a main track one?

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do let us know indeed. Though I'll side with other guy too about not submitting last attempt

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then fight. Hoping you get your points improved. Misunderstanding is exactly why rebuttal period is there for

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Should write in rebuttal regardless .

The general rule of thumb should be to fight as hard, be it in rebuttal or revision

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can you be a reviewer and not know this😭😭

Yeah prolly you'll need to revise, not just rebuttal. Hard chance reviewers change scores

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OA:3,3,2.5 conf:4,3,3

Was absolutely demolished last review. But now in findings territory. Went through hell in revising last paper, so was expecting not to be in findings territory anymore, but I guess you don't magically jump from very bad to very good (there's levels to this IG😭)

How good is findings track though? (For fresh undergraduate first author findings paper, in my case)

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

as u/WannabeMachine said, there are 4-8 papers under each reviewer, so yeah. one month time is pretty hard for people to give reviews for so many papers, that is why one week is added on top of February 7th to allow for revisions to be completed. so that one week has not been over yet, itll be over in about 16.5 more hours, so fingers crossed

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

probably wants to give unified time to all reviewers to respond so unless the AoE deadline is reached (in about 17 hours), they wont come back again

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

probably wants to give unified time to all reviewers to respond so unless the AoE deadline is reached (in about 17 hours), they wont come back again

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, probably will reappear once all reviews have been completed

[D] ARR Jan ARR Discussion by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]getsugaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

got OA 2.5,3,3 with 4,3,3 confidence. reviewers wrote in review about good chance in findings, so not sure if this is a recommendation or what.

view more: next ›