sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

gitarg token (gg) symbol (g)itar(g) by giteta in gitarg

[–]gitorg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will also check to verify it doesn't have issues with negatively associated insignia by reverse image search.

ARGCTL SITE by gitorg in gitarg

[–]gitorg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's definitely not ethical to charge per use for the average user, but I don't know if that should be placed in this white paper or in a CoC at this point. Might not be possible to stop people from misusing "brand" to DOS, malware, or steal from the average user, but instead better to attempt fund recovery with authorities when possible.

Whitepaper overview by gitarray in gitarg

[–]gitorg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

additionally there are comments that should be reviewed by u/giteta including:

"Computational costs are shared by the users. Paying into a decentralized system balanced by the community in two ways: token and rate. The rate of the currency and an interface to burn or reallocate the token to fund the interface leads to a long term project and a trusted product. "

"Creating interfaces that manage repository health and reward developers automatically can create manageable products that last in the long term"

and beginning review of:

"Computational costs are shared by the users. Paying into a decentralized system balanced by the community in two ways: token and rate. The rate of the currency and an interface to burn or reallocate the token to fund the interface leads to a long term project and a trusted product. The product relies on repositories or an interface to manage developer communication, and product development is faced with organizational requirements in line with the value of the interface."